Mon, Oct 19, 2026Fall (Semester 1) · Week 9Day 39 of 7780-min blockCalendar fit

Gel electrophoresis lab

Essential question: How do scientists turn something invisible, like DNA fragments, into a picture they can actually measure?Enduring understanding: sorts DNA by size using charge and a sieve, so band position becomes a readable size measurement in .

Safety gate · before any work

  • Wear nitrile gloves for the whole lab whenever you touch the gel, loading dye, buffer, or stain, and wash your hands with soap after you take the gloves off.
  • The power supply and the buffer-filled chamber carry a live electrical current. Keep hands, sleeves, and liquids away from the leads, snap the lid on before you switch the power on, and turn the power off before you open the lid or remove the gel.
  • Treat the DNA stain (GelRed or SYBR Safe) and used gels as chemical waste. Use only pre-stained or stain-free gels; ethidium bromide is a mutagen and is not used in this class unless your teacher hands it to you directly.

Do now

Run or model gel electrophoresis and interpret band positions to compare DNA fragments.

DueTonight, 11:29 PM
Hand in
Gel banding data table with migration distances, largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.
Where
Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not.

You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

Where you are · this course
PCR, restriction enzymes, electrophoresis, microarrays, and the limits of each method. Gel electrophoresis lab ▸ Day 3
Day 39 of 77 this semester38 left before WebXam
🧬 Where you are · PLTW
Medical InterventionsUnit 2: How to Screen What is In Your Genes ▸ Lesson 2.1 Genetic Testing and Screening"Activity 2.1.2 Copying Our Genes"
Matched to your live myPLTW course (verified June 2026).
Today's driving question

After PCR, you have a clear tube of DNA fragments you cannot see. How does running them through a gel tell you their sizes in ?

Today you'll be able to

Run or model and interpret band positions to compare DNA fragments.

You've got it when
  • You'll be able to read band positions on a gel.
  • You'll be able to estimate fragment sizes using a ladder.
Due today · Lab report RequiredGel banding with distances, largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.
Do-Now · start these with your notes closed
  1. DNA moves toward the positive or the negative electrode in a gel. Which one, and why?
  2. In a gel, do smaller or larger DNA fragments travel farther from the wells?
Do this · step by step
numbered so we can always find our place
  1. 1Load the gel diagram or wet gel with the sample wells and a size ladder labeled.
  2. 2Record how far each band travels and rank fragments from largest to smallest.
  3. 3Use the ladder to estimate the size of two unknown bands in .
  4. 4Write one sentence explaining why smaller fragments travel farther through the gel.
  5. 5Submit your banding interpretation with estimated sizes as your lab evidence.
Interrupted or lost? Find your place by step: gel or diagram loaded with wells and ladder labeled, band distances recorded and ranked, two unknown sizes estimated from the ladder, and one sentence on why small fragments run farther. Continue at the first step not finished.
Optional project open: 072130 Molecular Lab Review - solo or group, about 1.5 to 2 hours total. Due by Fri, Jan 15, 2027. Great WebXam prep.
The story

What did this day actually feel like?

Gel electrophoresis lab

LAB Running a gel. DNA is negatively charged so it moves toward the positive end, and smaller fragments travel further through the gel.

Loading the wells is genuinely difficult. I punctured the bottom of one well and lost that sample. You get one try per well.

Turned in: lab report → Lab Reports folder

Fiction. There is no such student. The lessons, labs and dates are the real planned course; the student, the classmates and the conversations are invented.

The comic

The same day, drawn.

Drawing, panel 53: Gel electrophoresis lab.

Running a gel. DNA is negatively charged so it moves toward the positive end, and smaller fragments travel further through the gel.

ME

I punctured the bottom of the well. That sample is gone and you get one try.

Panel 53Gel electrophoresis lab · 2026-10-19
Read week 11, 5 panels

Fiction. There is no such student. The lessons, labs and dates are the real planned course; the student, the classmates and the conversations are invented.

🛠 Get unstuck · pick your level

Run the lab
Run or model the gel, record how far each band traveled, rank the fragments largest to smallest, and use the ladder to estimate two unknown band sizes in base pairs.
Absent? Async catch-up
If you were absent, use the gel image in the course shell. Line up the unknown bands against the ladder and estimate two sizes, then write one sentence on why smaller fragments travel farther.

Lab day: Tier 1 is the whole class at the bench. No extension today.

🔑 Today's words · 5

primerrestriction enzymegel electrophoresismicroarrayhybridization
+1 more in the word bank

Tap a word in the lesson for a plain meaning and one example. Recycled into next week's Do-Now.

Today's study notebook
Molecular testing toolkit: PCR, gel electrophoresis, and microarrays for analyzing DNA.
Open the notebook
Watch first: today's 1-minute intro
Audio overviewVideo overviewMind mapStudy guideFlashcardsQuizData table
Where this fits
Tested on (Ohio WebXam)
Genetics of Disease · 072130
PLTW lesson
MI · Lesson 2.1 Genetic Testing and Screening
WebXam domain
Bio-Molecular Technology
Evidence to produce
Lab report
Lab / skill
Genetic Science Learning Center: Gel Electrophoresis
Do the work · 80-minute blockfirst 5 min = hook

💡 Big idea: acts as a sieve and DNA is pulled by charge, so smaller fragments travel farther and band position becomes a readable size map.

  1. 0-8 and equipment orientation; review PCR pre-lab connection
  2. 8-25Load wells (or annotate gel diagram); identify ladder lane
  3. 25-45Record distances; rank all bands from largest to smallest
  4. 45-60Estimate sizes of two unknown bands using ladder; write values in
  5. 60-72Write explanation sentence for size-vs.- relationship
  6. 72-80Submit and interpretation; clean up workspace
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Hook: Show an image of a finished gel and ask: what information is hiding in those faint blue bands?
  • Why it matters: is the standard readout for PCR in forensics, disease diagnosis, and the genetic tests you studied this unit.
  • Today's work: You load, run (or model), and interpret; your is the lab report.
  • Exit goal: Band interpretation with two size estimates submitted before the bell.
Know by the end
  • DNA is negatively charged at neutral pH; an electric field pulls fragments toward the positive pole.
  • acts as a molecular sieve: smaller fragments thread through faster and travel farther.
  • A is a mix of fragments of known size; aligning unknown bands to ladder bands gives a size estimate in .
Open this PLTW section today

PCR, restriction enzymes, electrophoresis, microarrays, and the limits of each method. · lab

Day 3 of this lesson. Open this exact section in myPLTW (find it in Clever, Microsoft sign-in), then do the work below.

Do this: Open Activity 2.1.2 Copying Our Genes in myPLTW and complete the activity using your PCR output.

Complete

Mark the activity complete after your and interpretation are submitted.

How far to get

PCR diagram should be done (Tuesday); gel banding due today.

Upload as evidence

Gel banding with distances, size estimates, and explanation submitted.

The official PLTW activity stays inside myPLTW. If myPLTW will not open, use F1 and E1-E3 on this page to complete today's local evidence decision, then make up the official activity when access returns. Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not.

Today's PLTW tracker · fill in and submit

Check things off as you work, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible through the submission route shown below.

Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.

PCR, restriction enzymes, electrophoresis, microarrays, and the limits of each method.Day 3 of this projectSee the full week plan
Today's PLTW target

PCR, restriction enzymes, electrophoresis, microarrays, and the limits of each method. · Gel electrophoresis lab

Open Activity 2.1.2 Copying Our Genes in myPLTW and complete the activity using your PCR output.

PCR diagram should be done (Tuesday); gel banding due today.

This is how Mr. Mendoza sees the class keeping pace with PLTW. Be honest, it only helps if it is accurate.

1 · What you do today

🎯 Run or model and interpret band positions to compare DNA fragments.

  • Load the gel diagram or wet gel with the sample wells and a size ladder labeled.
  • Record how far each band travels and rank fragments from largest to smallest.
  • Use the ladder to estimate the size of two unknown bands in .
  • Write one sentence explaining why smaller fragments travel farther through the gel.
  • Submit your banding interpretation with estimated sizes as your lab evidence.
2 · What you turn in

Lab report: Gel banding with distances, largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.

Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not. Use the checklist just below and upload by 11:29 PM for full credit. Absent with an excused absence? You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

3 · Who's doing what (team)
TaskWho
Load the gel diagram or wet gel with the sample wells and a size ladder labeled._______
Record how far each band travels and rank fragments from largest to smallest._______
Use the ladder to estimate the size of two unknown bands in ._______
Write one sentence explaining why smaller fragments travel farther through the gel._______
Submit your banding interpretation with estimated sizes as your lab evidence._______

Working solo? Put your own name in "Who" for every row.

4 · Words I can use correctly
5 · I'm successful today when I can…
  • You'll be able to read band positions on a gel.
  • You'll be able to estimate fragment sizes using a ladder.
6 · Reflection & next steps
Where are you today?0/7 checked
Pick your period and code first.
Your 4 steps today
  1. 1
    Do this
    Run or model gel electrophoresis and interpret band positions to compare DNA fragments.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Submit this
    Lab report: Gel banding data table with migration distances, largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.
  4. 4
    Submit it here
    1. 1Open the drop folder.
    2. 2Sign in with your district Microsoft account, not a personal one.
    3. 3Upload the file, named Lastname_Firstname__Assignment Title.
    4. 4Your own upload panel says Uploaded with a green check: that is your receipt.
    Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not. Genetics of Disease (Medical Interventions) › PCR, restriction enzymes, electrophoresis, microarrays, and the limits of each method. › Lab report
    Open the drop folder
Were you absent? Jump to the make-up plan
Learn it · deck, reading, and vocabulary
Socratic teaching slide deck

The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.

Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.

Carry forward

Genetic results can be uncertain and easy to misread, so who controls access to them is an ethical decision that can protect or harm a patient.

Daily take-home

acts as a sieve and DNA is pulled by charge, so smaller fragments travel farther and band position becomes a readable size map.

Inspect the analogy

A library keeps a master plan protected while working copies guide production at different stations.

  1. Why protect the master copy?
  2. What information moves?
  3. Where can an error change the final product?
Rule

Stored information can be copied, read, and converted into a functional product.

Where it breaks

Genes are regulated biological sequences, not conscious instructions, and one gene rarely determines a whole trait alone.

Map the analogy to biology
  • Master plan maps to DNA.
  • Working copy maps to RNA.
  • Production output maps to or a regulated cell function.
Read this first

Driving question: After PCR, you have a clear tube of DNA fragments you cannot see. How does running them through a gel tell you their sizes in ?

What you already know: Genetic results can be uncertain and easy to misread, so who controls access to them is an ethical decision that can protect or harm a patient.

New idea: acts as a sieve and DNA is pulled by charge, so smaller fragments travel farther and band position becomes a readable size map.

Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Gel electrophoresis lab. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Trace the labeled testing, treatment, or biological process and identify where evidence limits the decision.

  1. Observe or measure the relevant feature in lab.
  2. Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
  3. Apply this rule: Stored information can be copied, read, and converted into a functional product.
  4. Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.

Real biomedical example: After PCR, you have a clear tube of DNA fragments you cannot see. How does running them through a gel tell you their sizes in ?

What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.

What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.

Vocabulary:
  • : A short single strand of DNA that binds to a target sequence and gives DNA polymerase a starting point to build a new strand, as in PCR.
  • : A that recognizes a specific and cuts the strand there, a key tool for cutting and studying genes.
  • : A lab technique that uses an electric current to pull DNA or fragments through a gel, separating them by size.
  • : A chip holding thousands of tiny DNA spots that lets scientists measure the activity of many genes at once by detecting which spots light up.
  • : The pairing of two single DNA or RNA strands with matching base sequences into a double strand, used in tests to detect a specific gene.
  • marker: A measurable feature, molecule, or gene used to identify a cell, organism, or condition, like a flag that signals something specific.

Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.

Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.

Evidence set and decision
E1 · Observation

DNA is negatively charged at neutral pH; an electric field pulls fragments toward the positive pole.

Limit: E1 supplies context or an observation; it does not by itself establish the explanation.

E2 · Mechanism

acts as a sieve and DNA is pulled by charge, so smaller fragments travel farther and band position becomes a readable size map.

Limit: E2 is a teaching statement or comparison and must be checked against the task evidence.

E3 · Result

You'll be able to read band positions on a gel.

Limit: E3 supports only the result or product criterion named here; it cannot justify a broader clinical or causal claim.

PLTW-GEND-2026-10-19 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario

Your role: medical interventions team member

Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from lab supports before submitting the lab report named on the lesson page.

  • Keep the current design.
  • Revise the feature that misses a criterion.
  • Run one more fair test before choosing.

Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the lab report.

Claim ceiling: The supplied lesson evidence can support an observation, pattern, classroom mechanism, or next-step decision about lab. It cannot by itself prove causation, establish a real clinical diagnosis, or justify action outside this classroom task.

Composite case file · PLTW-GEND-2026-10-19

Reason for review: Your team must decide what the evidence from lab supports before submitting the lab report named on the lesson page.

Context: sorts DNA by size using charge and a sieve, so band position becomes a readable size measurement in .

Timeline:
  • T1: Load the gel diagram or wet gel with the sample wells and a size ladder labeled.
  • T2: Record how far each band travels and rank fragments from largest to smallest.
  • T3: Use the ladder to estimate the size of two unknown bands in .
  • T4: Write one sentence explaining why smaller fragments travel farther through the gel.
  • T5: Submit your banding interpretation with estimated sizes as your lab evidence.
Evidence records:
  • E1: DNA is negatively charged at neutral pH; an electric field pulls fragments toward the positive pole.
  • E2: acts as a sieve and DNA is pulled by charge, so smaller fragments travel farther and band position becomes a readable size map.
  • E3: You'll be able to read band positions on a gel.

Measurements: Use only the measurements, units, graph, or counts supplied in today's task. No additional patient measurement is implied.

Figure finding: Teaching diagram for lab. Trace the labeled testing, treatment, or biological process and identify where evidence limits the decision. This is a teaching model, not patient or experimental data.

Uncertainty: This is a composite classroom scenario. Missing history, measurements, or confirmation tests remain unknown and limit the conclusion.

Math moment
Formula or setup

Mean = sum of values / number of values. Median = middle ordered value. Range = maximum - minimum.

Worked parallel example

For 2, 4, 4, and 10: mean = 20 / 4 = 5, median = 4, and range = 10 - 2 = 8.

Units and reasonableness

Mean, median, and range keep the measurement unit. Order the values before finding the median.

Try it with today's data

Calculate the requested summary for today's supplied values, then write what it reveals and what it hides.

Design record
Criteria
  • The solution must address the stated need in lab.
  • The decision must be supported by E1-E3.
  • The final product must make the success criteria visible.
Constraints
  • Complete the work inside the 80-minute block.
  • Use only supplied or teacher-approved materials and evidence.
  • Do not trade , accessibility, or privacy for speed.
Tradeoff weights
  • and evidence quality: must pass before scoring other criteria.
  • User need and effectiveness: highest scored criterion.
  • Time, cost, and ease of use: compare only after and effectiveness pass.

Test evidence: For each option, record the E1-E3 result that supports or fails each criterion. Do not assign a score without a named observation.

Iteration log
  1. Version or option tested
  2. Criterion met or missed
  3. Evidence ID and result
  4. Revision made
  5. Reason for the revision
Decision record
  1. Need and user
  2. Criteria and constraints
  3. Chosen option and evidence
  4. Test result
  5. Revision and reason
Watch the trap

Students often think Students often think larger DNA fragments travel farther because bigger things seem like they would move faster or push through harder.. The trap: It is the opposite. The is a sieve, so smaller fragments thread through the mesh faster and travel farther, while large fragments get held up near the wells. If you rank size by distance backwards, every size estimate you read off the gel will be wrong.

Worked example · a parallel case (guides, does not reveal)
Gel banding interpretation
Completes: Completes the gel lab analysis: a banding data table with migration distances, a largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.

I recorded how far each band traveled from the well and used the size ladder to estimate the unknown bands.

Ranking, largest to smallest: Band 1 traveled the least (largest), then Band 2, then Band 3 traveled the farthest (smallest).

Size estimates: Unknown Band 2 lined up between the 1000 bp and 750 bp ladder bands, so I estimate about 850 bp. Unknown Band 3 lined up near the 500 bp ladder band, so I estimate about 500 bp.

Why smaller fragments travel farther: DNA is negatively charged, so the electric field pulls all fragments toward the positive end. The agarose acts as a sieve, and smaller fragments thread through the gel's pores more easily, so they move farther in the same time.

BandMigration distanceSize estimate
Ladder 1000 bp18 mm1000 bp (known)
Unknown Band 221 mm~850 bp
Ladder 500 bp30 mm500 bp (known)
Unknown Band 330 mm~500 bp
Gel banding table: shorter migration matches larger size; Unknown Band 2 estimated at 850 bp, Unknown Band 3 at 500 bp against the ladder.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the gel lab analysis: a banding data table with migration distances, a largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.

Build yours step by step
  1. State the question and method.
  2. Present the observations and data with units.
  3. Explain the result, limitations, and next investigation.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Submit your data table and interpretation to the class site.

See the full worked example
Portal terms
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
This unit's vocabulary
/MY-kroh-uh-ray/

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Add two of these to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Build your vocabulary · optional, for extra credit

Pick just 2 or 3 words from today and make them yours: write what each one means in your own words, name the context clue or evidence that helped, then give one example from what you actually did in Gel electrophoresis lab. Try your own words first; the glossary is there if you get stuck. This is voluntary and counts as extra credit, so keep it short.

primer
restriction enzyme
gel electrophoresis
microarray
hybridization
marker

Saved on this device. Show Mr. Mendoza or add these to your notebook glossary to claim the extra credit.

Teacher-posted resources

Classroom documents for this lesson are posted in Schoology. Open Clever, then Schoology, and find each one by the name shown on its card.

Use during lessonFor: Everyone
MI 2.1.2 PCR Lab Group Assignment & Protocol Guide
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Open this when the class reaches this activity and use it to complete the required lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched PCR, , microarrays by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-2_How-to-Screen-Your-Genes/2.1_Genetic-Testing-and-Screening; keywords:pcr, gel electrophoresis. Score 142. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Catch-up / reteachFor: Need extra support
MI Unit 2 Student Review: Genetic Disorders & Gel Electrophoresis
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched PCR, , microarrays by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-2_How-to-Screen-Your-Genes/00_Unit-Overview; keywords:pcr, gel electrophoresis. Score 138. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Extension / challengeFor: Ready to go deeper
MI Activity 2.1.4 Genetic Testing (Optional)
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this after the required lesson work when you are ready for a harder application or a deeper connection.

Placement rationale

Matched PCR, , microarrays by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-2_How-to-Screen-Your-Genes/2.1_Genetic-Testing-and-Screening; keywords:gel electrophoresis. Score 134. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

How to get there: open Clever and sign in with your Microsoft (district) account. Both myPLTW and Schoology are in Clever. Do the activity in myPLTW. Turn the work in on this site or hand it to Mr. Mendoza, because that is the step that counts as submitted. Schoology only shows your report-card grade later.

Check yourself · commit, then reveal

Claim ceiling for this check: The supplied lesson evidence can support an observation, pattern, classroom mechanism, or next-step decision about lab. It cannot by itself prove causation, establish a real clinical diagnosis, or justify action outside this classroom task.

Quick self-check · commit, then reveal

An unknown band sits between the 500 bp and 1000 bp ladder bands, closer to the 500 bp band. Roughly how large is it, and how did size determine its position?

How sure are you?

Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.

Cumulative WebXam review · flash practice

Fast retrieval with instant answers, not the commit-then-reveal check above. Try each from memory first: write what you remember about the earlier units, then check yourself here.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Growing the evidence: aseptic culturing and superbug data] A single random mutation gives one bacterium a stronger cell wall that resists an antibiotic. How does this lead to a resistant infection?
[Review: Sound and shields: audiograms, the immune response, and vaccines] A vaccination works by activating the immune system so that a specialized cell can rapidly make antibodies on future exposure. What is that long-lasting cell called?
[Review: Reading the Family Tree: Genetic Testing Launch] A single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is best described as which of the following?
How many primers are required for a standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR)?
Go further and get help
Lab · prepare, conduct, complete
1Prepare
Pre-lab pass · clear all six to go to the bench
0/6

I can name the procedure's purpose and the evidence I will record. I can identify each named hazard and the control that reduces it: Wear nitrile gloves for the whole lab whenever you touch the gel, loading dye, buffer, or stain, and wash your hands with soap after you take the gloves off. My data table is ready before materials are handled.

Finish the checklist before you handle any material.

Bring / set up
Agarose gel (pre-poured, 1%) or printed gel diagram for modelingDNA size ladder (e.g., 1 kb ladder) or printed ladder referenceLoading dye mixed with PCR samples or simulated colored dye solutionsMicropipettes (2-20 uL) and tips, or transfer pipettes if using colored dye modelElectrophoresis chamber and power supply (or gel image printout for modeling)Ruler or printed scale bar for migration distance measurementLab notebook or data-table template (paper or digital)Ethidium bromide-free stain or pre-stained gel (GelRed or SYBR Safe if visualizing live)UV transilluminator or blue-light box if staining (teacher use; students observe)Gloves (nitrile) for all students handling gel or stain
Safety · specific to today's hazards
  • Wear nitrile gloves for the whole lab whenever you touch the gel, loading dye, buffer, or stain, and wash your hands with soap after you take the gloves off.
  • The power supply and the buffer-filled chamber carry a live electrical current. Keep hands, sleeves, and liquids away from the leads, snap the lid on before you switch the power on, and turn the power off before you open the lid or remove the gel.
  • Treat the DNA stain (GelRed or SYBR Safe) and used gels as chemical waste. Use only pre-stained or stain-free gels; ethidium bromide is a mutagen and is not used in this class unless your teacher hands it to you directly.
  • If your teacher uses a UV transilluminator to photograph the gel, do not look at the UV source and do not stand near it without the UV-blocking shield or UV-rated goggles down. A blue-light box needs the amber filter, not the shield.
  • Wipe up any buffer or stain spill right away with paper towels, tell your teacher before you clean a stain spill, and drop spent gels, tips, and gloves in the labeled waste container, not the regular trash. Label every sample and photo with your group code, not your name, and wash your hands before you leave.
Review Lab Safety (rules, PPE, SDS, emergencies) and check your contract + test
2Conduct (Argument-Driven Inquiry)
  1. 1Before materials are handled, identify the purpose, variables or comparison, controls, measurement units, and stop-work condition.
  2. 2Frame the question and the model: your task is to figure out how DNA fragment size (the independent variable) controls how far a band travels through the agarose gel (the dependent variable), using the DNA ladder as your known-size reference control.
  3. 3Design and run the separation: load the size ladder in its own lane and your samples in the remaining wells, close the chamber, run the current at the set voltage until the dye front nears the far end, then stain (or use the pre-stained gel) so bands become visible.
  4. 4Collect the data: measure each band's migration distance from its well with a ruler in millimeters, rank all bands largest to smallest, and use the ladder bands to estimate the size of your two unknown bands in base pairs.
  5. 5Build your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER): write a claim answering the question (smaller fragments travel farther), back it with your specific ladder-versus-unknown distances, and reason from the agarose-as-sieve idea for why size sets migration.
  6. 6Argumentation session: post your claim and estimated band sizes, then walk to another group and question theirs. Ask how they aligned an unknown band to the ladder, whether a band could be two fragments, and how they know their voltage or run time did not distort the result.
  7. 7Revise and report: use the strongest challenge you heard or gave to revise your claim, size estimates, or explanation, then submit the corrected data table, ladder-based estimates, and final argument as your lab evidence.
  8. 8Record each result in the prepared table before interpreting it. Mark missing, repeated, or invalid results truthfully.
  9. 9Complete the named cleanup and waste route, remove PPE safely, wash hands when required, and confirm the station is ready for the next group.
Prepare this data table before materials are handled
Trial or sample IDIndependent conditionMeasured result with unitsObservation before interpretationQuality-control note
     
     
     
Genetic Science Learning Center: Gel Electrophoresis
3Complete
Argue from your evidence, then compare what you predicted to what happened. Error analysis names a specific method limit, never "human error".
You predicted

Before you load or read the gel, predict the band pattern. Rank a large, a medium, and a small fragment by how FAR you expect each to travel from the wells (which reaches the far end, which stays near the top), sketch where you expect your two unknown bands to land relative to the ladder, and name the size range in base pairs you expect for each unknown. Write it down so it is fixed before you see the run.

What actually happened

After the gel runs and the bands are visible, RECORD the real result: measure each band's migration distance in millimeters from its well, rank all bands largest to smallest, and read your two unknown band sizes off the ladder in base pairs. Then compare to your prediction: Did smaller fragments actually travel farther? Did your unknowns land where you expected against the ladder, and were your predicted size ranges too high, too low, or on target? Name one thing (voltage, run time, well loading, band alignment) that could explain any gap between what you predicted and what you saw.

Your lab report is graded on the rubric below, with extra weight on error analysis and method.
Where this leads: careers

What today's skills lead to. These are real health-science careers this course builds toward. Tap one to see, on the US Department of Labor's O*NET site, what the job actually involves, what it pays, and how fast it is growing.

What to do if you were absent
Today was a lab: do this instead

From home, study the linked Khan PCR and gel resources, then interpret the provided gel image: rank the fragments by size, estimate two unknown bands against the ladder, and explain the pattern.

Khan Academy: gel electrophoresis

Then submit your Lab report. Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

Genetic Science Learning Center: Gel Electrophoresis
How this is graded
For: Lab report: Gel banding data table with migration distances, largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Turned in the right way, on the class site or handed to Mr. Mendoza in class, and confirmed. Not in Schoology: that is where the report-card grade appears later.
  • Error analysis and method · counts double
    Name a specific limit of the method and how it moved your result, and compare what you predicted to what happened. "Human error" does not count; say what about the procedure or instrument caused it.