Vaccine and disease-model lab

Open your materials, follow the steps, then turn in your work.

Model how a vaccine triggers adaptive immunity and use disease-spread data to test a simple outbreak prediction.

Before lab work: Read the safety rules below and wait for your teacher’s approval. You may read the directions while you wait.

1. Open your materials

Use the materials named in the first step below. Open lesson resources.

2. Start the work

Diagram the adaptive immune response: antigen, antibody, and memory cell, labeling each step.

Show all 5 required steps
  1. Diagram the adaptive immune response: antigen, antibody, and memory cell, labeling each step.
  2. Open the disease-model dataset in the shell and identify the columns for infected, recovered, and vaccinated.
  3. Run the model at two vaccination rates and record new infections at each rate in a data table.
  4. Write one sentence comparing how the antibody response and the population data each slow disease spread.
  5. Save your diagram, data table, and comparison sentence as your lab evidence.

Lost your place? Reopen today's Vaccine and disease-model lab record. Find the last completed evidence ID, check it against the claim ceiling, and continue with the first unfinished step rather than restarting the whole task.

Check your work before submitting

  • You'll be able to trace how a vaccine produces antibodies and memory cells.
  • You'll be able to use model data to compare outbreak outcomes at different vaccination rates.

Before lab work: read the safety rules

  • No wet lab materials today; all work is computational and diagrammatic.
  • Dataset is anonymized class-aggregate; do not enter or share any personal health information.
  • If the simulation software requires a login, use only your school account credentials.

3. Turn in your work

DueCheck Schoology
Hand in
Adaptive immunity diagram, two-scenario disease-model data table, and one comparison sentence.
How to submit and name your file

Use the submission route shown on today's page.

In Schoology, open your course and the assignment for this lesson. Attach your file, select Submit, and check that it appears in the submission.

PDF upload help

You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

Find this lesson's Schoology assignments

These are existing assignments for your section. Follow the directions in the assignment you are working on; this list does not add new work. Check Schoology for each deadline.

Link will not open? Open Schoology, choose your course and section, and find the title shown above.

How this lesson connects

Keep using what you learned last class: The audiogram plots louder thresholds farther down the chart so that a lower line reads as worse hearing, which lets a clinician classify severity and predict which range of speech sounds is likely to be hardest to hear. Today: Innate and adaptive defenses interact, and vaccination can prepare antigen-specific immune memory that changes the probability or severity of later disease without guaranteeing protection for every person.

Optional: listen or watch a unit review
Optional unit study notebook
How the immune system defends the body and how vaccines build protection.
Open the notebook
Optional review video
Audio overviewVideo overviewMind mapStudy guideFlashcardsQuizData table
Need help? Warm-up, timing, and directions

💡 Big idea: and adaptive defenses interact, and vaccination can prepare -specific immune memory that changes the probability or severity of later disease without guaranteeing protection for every person.

  1. 0-5Hook curves and review for dataset work
  2. 5-20Draw and label adaptive : in, and memory cell out
  3. 20-40Open disease-model dataset; identify columns; run two vaccination-rate scenarios
  4. 40-55Record new-infection counts in ; calculate difference between rates
  5. 55-70Write comparison sentence; connect molecular diagram to population curve
  6. 70-80Save all three artifacts to course shell; teacher debrief
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Hook: Show two outbreak curves side by side: one unvaccinated population, one at 80% coverage.
  • Why it matters: The same immune logic that protects one person, at population scale, protects those who cannot be vaccinated.
  • Today's work: You diagram the molecular response, then run a model to see it at population scale.
  • Exit goal: Diagram, , and comparison sentence saved before the bell.
Know by the end
  • produces -specific antibodies and long-lived memory B and T cells on first exposure.
  • A delivers without disease, priming memory cells so the secondary response is faster and stronger.
  • depends on the fraction vaccinated exceeding the threshold derived from R-zero.

PLTW connection and today's work

Open Activity 1.4.1 Disease Prevention Through Vaccination in Lesson 1.4 of myPLTW. Complete the assigned adaptive immunity diagram alongside the disease-model dataset.

Today's stopping point: Audiogram work should be done (Tuesday); immunity diagram and disease-model data table due today.

PLTW activity titles identify the course connection. If your account will not open, use the posted materials for today and tell Mr. Mendoza. Do not mark an online activity complete unless you completed it.

Course connection

  • Activity 1.4.1 Disease Prevention Through Vaccination
Open Activity 1.4.1 Disease Prevention Through Vaccination in myPLTW

Use the turn-in directions at the top of this page. Do not create a second submission unless your teacher asks for one.

Show another explanation or a smaller first step

Need help? Choose a starting point

Run the lab
Complete the assigned Adaptive immunity diagram, two-scenario disease-model data table, and one comparison sentence., cite at least two evidence IDs, apply the reviewed rule, and name one limitation.
Missed class? Start here
Use the sentence frame: E1 shows ____. E2 helps explain ____. Therefore I can claim ____, but I cannot claim ____.

Finish the assigned lab safely before starting extra practice.

Lesson resources: reading, slides, and vocabulary
Socratic teaching slide deck

The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.

Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.

Carry forward

The plots louder thresholds farther down the chart so that a lower line reads as worse hearing, which lets a clinician classify severity and predict which range of speech sounds is likely to be hardest to hear.

Daily take-home

and adaptive defenses interact, and vaccination can prepare -specific immune memory that changes the probability or severity of later disease without guaranteeing protection for every person.

Inspect the analogy

An airport checkpoint uses an ID check, a metal detector, and an X-ray scanner.

  1. What can the ID check detect?
  2. What might set off the metal detector by mistake?
  3. Why do we need the X-ray if we already checked their ID?
Rule

A decision is stronger when the test fits the question and its limits are known.

Where it breaks

Medical decisions also depend on biology, patient context, ethics, and professional judgment.

Map the analogy to biology
  • The ID check maps to confirming patient identity.
  • The metal detector maps to a rapid, non-specific screening test.
  • The X-ray scanner maps to a detailed, specific diagnostic test.
Read this first

Driving question: If a disease has an R-zero of 12, like measles, what fraction of a Cleveland school has to be vaccinated to keep one infected student from starting an outbreak?

What you already know: The plots louder thresholds farther down the chart so that a lower line reads as worse hearing, which lets a clinician classify severity and predict which range of speech sounds is likely to be hardest to hear.

New idea: and adaptive defenses interact, and vaccination can prepare -specific immune memory that changes the probability or severity of later disease without guaranteeing protection for every person.

Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Vaccine and disease-model lab. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Trace the labeled testing, treatment, or biological process and identify where evidence limits the decision.

  1. Observe or measure the relevant feature in today's lesson.
  2. Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
  3. Apply this rule: A decision is stronger when the test fits the question and its limits are known.
  4. Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.

Real biomedical example: Today the medical interventions team uses and disease-model lab to make a bounded evidence decision. A teaching model simplifies interacting cells, signals, timing, vaccine types, and population differences.

What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.

What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.

Vocabulary:
  • : The spiral, snail-shaped part of the inner ear that turns sound vibrations into nerve signals the brain reads as hearing.
  • : A sensory cell in the inner ear with tiny hair-like bundles that convert sound vibrations or movement into nerve signals the brain can read.
  • : A graph from a hearing test that plots the softest sounds a person can hear at different pitches, showing the type and degree of any hearing loss.
  • : A preparation that delivers an (or the instructions to make one) so the immune system learns to recognize the real later.
  • : Protection that arises when enough people in a community are immune to a disease that its spread slows and shields those who are not immune.
  • : The part of the immune system that learns a specific , builds targeted antibodies and memory cells, and responds faster the next time it appears.

Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.

Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.

Evidence set and decision
E1 · Source fact

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the source this lesson's claim is checked against: Principles of Vaccination

Limit: A teaching model simplifies interacting cells, signals, timing, types, and population differences.

E2 · Teaching model

A decision is stronger when the test fits the question and its limits are known.

Limit: Medical decisions also depend on biology, patient context, ethics, and professional judgment.

E3 · Task criterion

You can trace how a produces antibodies and memory cells.

Limit: E3 defines the classroom product or success criterion. It is not independent scientific evidence and cannot justify a clinical or causal claim.

PLTW-GEND-2026-10-12 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario

Your role: medical interventions team member

Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from today's lesson supports before submitting the lab report named on today's page.

  • Explain protection as memory cells built from before exposure, so enough covered students break the chain of spread.
  • Describe the as a small dose of the real disease, so being vaccinated means getting slightly sick first.
  • Wait to apply the model here until someone measures how many students are actually vaccinated and how they mix.

Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the lab report.

Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about today's lesson. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Composite case file · PLTW-GEND-2026-10-12

Reason for review: Your team must decide what the evidence from today's lesson supports before submitting the lab report named on today's page.

Context: Today the medical interventions team uses and disease-model lab to make a bounded evidence decision. A teaching model simplifies interacting cells, signals, timing, vaccine types, and population differences.

Timeline:
  • T1: Diagram the adaptive : , , and memory cell, labeling each step.
  • T2: Open the disease-model dataset in the shell and identify the columns for infected, recovered, and vaccinated.
  • T3: Run the model at two vaccination rates and record new infections at each rate in a .
  • T4: Write one sentence comparing how the response and the population data each slow disease spread.
  • T5: Save your diagram, , and comparison sentence as your lab evidence.
Evidence records:
  • E1: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is the source this lesson's claim is checked against: Principles of Vaccination
  • E2: A decision is stronger when the test fits the question and its limits are known.
  • E3: You can trace how a produces antibodies and memory cells.

Measurements: Use only the measurements, units, graph, or counts supplied in today's task. No additional patient measurement is implied.

Figure finding: Teaching diagram for and disease-model lab. Trace the labeled testing, treatment, or biological process and identify where evidence limits the decision. This is a teaching model, not patient or experimental data.

Uncertainty: This is a composite classroom scenario. Missing history, measurements, or confirmation tests remain unknown and limit the conclusion.

Math moment
Formula or setup

Rate or percent = part / comparison total x 100%. Percent change = (new - comparison) / comparison x 100%.

Worked parallel example

If 18 of 60 records meet a condition, the frequency is 18 / 60 x 100% = 30%.

Units and reasonableness

Name the comparison total. A percent describes the supplied group and does not automatically predict an individual's outcome.

Try it with today's data

Use today's supplied counts to calculate one rate, risk, frequency, or percent change. Show the denominator and interpretation.

Watch the trap

Students often think A polished answer about and disease-model lab is trustworthy even when its evidence source, comparison, or limitation is missing.. The trap: Presentation quality cannot raise the evidence level. A teaching model simplifies interacting cells, signals, timing, types, and population differences.

Worked example · a parallel case (guides, does not reveal)
Immunity diagram and disease-model data
Completes: Completes the vaccine modeling lab: an adaptive immunity diagram, a two-scenario disease-model data table, and one sentence comparing the antibody response with the population data.

Adaptive immunity diagram (in words): A pathogen displays an antigen. A B cell that fits that antigen activates and makes antibodies that tag the pathogen for destruction. Some of those cells become long-lived memory cells, so the next exposure triggers a faster, stronger response. A vaccine delivers the antigen without the disease, so memory cells form safely.

Disease-model results: I ran the model at two vaccination rates and recorded new infections.

Comparison sentence: The antibody response stops the disease inside one person by clearing the pathogen, while the population data shows that vaccinating enough people stops the disease between people by leaving the virus too few hosts to spread to.

Vaccination rateNew infections (model run)
40%180
80%22
Disease-model table: at 40% vaccination there were 180 new infections; at 80% vaccination only 22.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the vaccine modeling lab: an adaptive immunity diagram, a two-scenario disease-model data table, and one sentence comparing the antibody response with the population data.

Build yours step by step
  1. State the question and method.
  2. Present the observations and data with units.
  3. Explain the result, limitations, and next investigation.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Save the diagram, data table, and comparison sentence to Schoology.

See the full worked example
Portal terms
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
This unit's vocabulary
/AW-dee-oh-gram/

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Add two of these to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Build your vocabulary · optional, for extra credit

Pick just 2 or 3 words from today and make them yours: write what each one means in your own words, name the context clue or evidence that helped, then give one example from what you actually did in Vaccine and disease-model lab. Try your own words first; the glossary is there if you get stuck. This is voluntary and counts as extra credit, so keep it short.

cochlea
hair cell
audiogram
vaccine
herd immunity
adaptive immunity

Saved on this device. Show Mr. Mendoza or add these to your notebook glossary to claim the extra credit.

Connected learning centerMeasles: More Than a RashMI: Choose a proportionate intervention. Use this case to apply today's lesson to verified outbreak evidence.
Teacher-posted resources

Classroom documents for this lesson are posted in Schoology. Open Clever, then Schoology, and find each one by the name shown on its card.

Use during lessonFor: Everyone
MI COVID Activity 3: Onward Toward a Vaccine
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this with the vaccination lesson to connect development to a real example.

Placement rationale

Relocated to the vaccination lesson (Unit 1.4), where the COVID activity supports the day. Visibility: student-schoology.

Catch-up / reteachFor: Need extra support
Lesson 1.3 Hearing Loss Key Terms
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched Hearing loss, cochlear implants, vaccines by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-1_How-to-Fight-Infection/1.3_Hearing-Loss; keywords:hearing, , cochlear. Score 142. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Catch-up / reteachFor: Need extra support
MI Activity 1.4.2 Making Vaccines NOVA Notes
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched Hearing loss, cochlear implants, vaccines by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-1_How-to-Fight-Infection/1.4_Vaccination; keywords:, vaccination. Score 142. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Use during lessonFor: Everyone
PLTW MI Activity 1.4.2 Vaccine Development Student Activity
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Open this when the class reaches this activity and use it to complete the required lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched Hearing loss, cochlear implants, vaccines by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-1_How-to-Fight-Infection/1.4_Vaccination; keywords:, vaccination. Score 142. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Sign in to Clever with your district Microsoft account to open Schoology or myPLTW. Follow today's posted steps. If myPLTW will not open, use the posted alternative and tell Mr. Mendoza. Turn in your completed work through the Schoology assignment.

Practice: try a question, then check your answer

Claim ceiling for this check: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about today's lesson. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Quick self-check · commit, then reveal

A student makes a certain conclusion about Vaccine and disease-model lab from one classroom result. What must the student add before the conclusion is defensible?

How sure are you?

Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.

Cumulative WebXam review · flash practice

Fast retrieval with instant answers, not the commit-then-reveal check above. Try each from memory first: write what you remember about the earlier units, then check yourself here.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Getting ready to test: serial dilutions and the ELISA setup] A technician makes a serial dilution starting with 100 ng/mL of antigen, transferring equal parts antigen and water at each step. What is the concentration after the first two dilutions?
[Review: Reading the color: running an ELISA and trusting your controls] An ELISA result is read simply as a color change with no number attached. This kind of observed, non-measurable result is called what?
[Review: Growing the evidence: aseptic culturing and superbug data] A single random mutation gives one bacterium a stronger cell wall that resists an antibiotic. How does this lead to a resistant infection?
Sound entering the ear causes the tympanic membrane to vibrate. Which structures vibrate next, in order, to carry the wave inward?
Missed class or ready for more?
🔬 Pre-lab simulation

Run this before you touch the bench. It is built from the real lab procedure, so the decisions you make here are the ones you will make with the equipment in your hands.

Who Does the Threshold Protect?
Open the simulation →
Lab · prepare, conduct, complete
1Prepare
Pre-lab pass · clear all six to go to the bench
0/6

I can name the procedure's purpose and the evidence I will record. I can state today's specific hazards and the control for each. If this deck does not name them, I ask Mr. Mendoza before I touch anything. My data table is ready before materials are handled.

Finish the checklist before you handle any material.

Bring / set up
Printed or projected blank immune-response diagram templateColored pencils or markers (at least two colors for antibody vs. memory cell)Access to disease-model dataset in course shell (computer or tablet per student)Printed or digital data-table template for recording infection counts
Safety · specific to today's hazards
  • No wet lab materials today; all work is computational and diagrammatic.
  • Dataset is anonymized class-aggregate; do not enter or share any personal health information.
  • If the simulation software requires a login, use only your school account credentials.
Review Lab Safety (rules, PPE, SDS, emergencies) and check your contract + test
2Conduct (Argument-Driven Inquiry)
  1. 1Before materials are handled, identify the purpose, variables or comparison, controls, measurement units, and stop-work condition.
  2. 2Diagram the adaptive immune response: antigen, antibody, and memory cell, labeling each step.
  3. 3Open the disease-model dataset in the shell and identify the columns for infected, recovered, and vaccinated.
  4. 4Run the model at two vaccination rates and record new infections at each rate in a data table.
  5. 5Write one sentence comparing how the antibody response and the population data each slow disease spread.
  6. 6Save your diagram, data table, and comparison sentence as your lab evidence.
  7. 7Record each result in the prepared table before interpreting it. Mark missing, repeated, or invalid results truthfully.
  8. 8Complete the named cleanup and waste route, remove PPE safely, wash hands when required, and confirm the station is ready for the next group.
Prepare this data table before materials are handled
Trial or sample IDIndependent conditionMeasured result with unitsObservation before interpretationQuality-control note
     
     
     
NIH MedlinePlus
3Complete
Argue from your evidence, then compare what you predicted to what happened. Error analysis names a specific method limit, never "human error".
You predicted

Before the procedure, predict the result and cite the rule behind the prediction.

What actually happened

After the procedure, compare the result with the prediction and name one limitation or source of uncertainty.

Your lab report is graded on the rubric below, with extra weight on error analysis and method.
Where this leads: careers

What today's skills lead to. These are real health-science careers this course builds toward. Tap one to see, on the US Department of Labor's O*NET site, what the job actually involves, what it pays, and how fast it is growing.

What to do if you were absent
Today was a lab: do this instead

Run the assigned virtual immunology lab from home, then complete the same case and data analysis: build the diagram and compare new infections at two vaccination rates from the provided dataset.

HHMI BioInteractive Immunology Virtual Lab (preview; use class dataset if blocked)

Use the submission route shown on today's page.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

NIH MedlinePlus
How this is graded
For: Lab report: Adaptive immunity diagram, two-scenario disease-model data table, and one comparison sentence.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Go to Schoology to turn this in. Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf. If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
  • Error analysis and method · counts double
    Name a specific limit of the method and how it moved your result, and compare what you predicted to what happened. "Human error" does not count; say what about the procedure or instrument caused it.