Microscopy image baseline

Open your materials, follow the steps, then turn in your work.

Use cell and tissue images to establish a baseline for normal versus abnormal morphology and a diagnostic workflow.

Before lab work: Read the safety rules below and wait for your teacher’s approval. You may read the directions while you wait.

1. Open your materials

Use the materials named in the first step below. Open lesson resources.

2. Start the work

Open the labeled microscopy images in the shell and identify normal tissue first.

Show all 5 required steps
  1. Open the labeled microscopy images in the shell and identify normal tissue first.
  2. Compare a benign and a malignant sample, noting differences in cell size, shape, and arrangement.
  3. Mark one image showing metastasis and explain in one line how it differs from a local tumor.
  4. Sketch the diagnostic workflow from image to tumor classification in three steps.
  5. Submit your morphology comparison and workflow sketch as your daily evidence.

Lost your place? Absent or interrupted? In the course shell, open the labeled microscopy images and start by identifying the normal tissue, then work the steps in order: benign vs malignant comparison noting size/shape/arrangement, mark the metastasis image and explain it in one line, sketch the three-step diagnostic workflow, submit your comparison and sketch. Resume at the first step you have not finished.

Check your work before submitting

  • You'll be able to tell normal from abnormal tissue morphology.
  • You'll be able to outline a basic cancer diagnostic workflow.

Before lab work: read the safety rules

  • All materials are image-based; no wet lab hazards today.
  • Microscopy images are de-identified patient tissue samples; treat them as clinical data and do not photograph or share beyond the class.
  • If using a light microscope to view prepared slides, follow school lab safety protocol: carry microscope with two hands, report broken slides to the teacher immediately.

3. Turn in your work

DueCheck Schoology
Hand in
Two-column morphology comparison (benign vs. malignant), one-line metastasis explanation, and a three-step diagnostic workflow sketch.
How to submit and name your file

Use the submission route shown on today's page.

In Schoology, open your course and the assignment for this lesson. Attach your file, select Submit, and check that it appears in the submission.

PDF upload help

You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

Find this lesson's Schoology assignments

These are existing assignments for your section. Follow the directions in the assignment you are working on; this list does not add new work. Check Schoology for each deadline.

Link will not open? Open Schoology, choose your course and section, and find the title shown above.

How this lesson connects

Keep using what you learned last class: Tracing each step of a plan to ranked evidence, and naming what would overturn it, is what separates clinical reasoning from a confident guess. Today: Malignant cells lose their normal shape and break through tissue boundaries, so a pathologist can read invasion and disorganization on a slide to judge whether a cancer can metastasize and how dangerous it is.

Optional: listen or watch a unit review
Optional unit study notebook
Cancer biology basics: what cancer is, how it is classified, and how screening catches it early.
Open the notebook
Optional review video
Audio overviewVideo overviewMind mapStudy guideFlashcardsQuizData table
Need help? Warm-up, timing, and directions

💡 Big idea: cells lose their normal shape and break through boundaries, so a pathologist can read invasion and disorganization on a slide to judge whether a can metastasize and how dangerous it is.

  1. 0-8Hook micrographs; establish normal as the baseline; review lab for image analysis
  2. 8-25Open labeled images; identify normal features; record cell size, shape, arrangement
  3. 25-45Compare benign vs. samples; record differences in two-column table
  4. 45-58Mark image; write one-line explanation of how it differs from local
  5. 58-72Sketch three-step diagnostic : image acquisition, classification, clinical report
  6. 72-80Submit morphology comparison and sketch; confirm break submissions complete
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Hook: Show side-by-side micrographs of normal colon and colon adenocarcinoma; ask what differences students notice without being told which is which.
  • Why it matters: Pathologists read these images to classify tumors and guide treatment; the vocabulary you learn today is used in every diagnosis.
  • Today's work: You compare normal, benign, and images and build the three-step that connects the image to the clinical call.
  • Exit goal: Morphology comparison and sketch submitted before the bell.
Know by the end
  • Normal cells are uniform in size and shape and maintain orderly architecture; cells are pleomorphic with disorganized arrangement.
  • Benign tumors grow locally without invading surrounding ; tumors invade and can shed cells into the bloodstream or .
  • is the spread of cells from the primary site to a distant organ via blood or ; it is the leading cause of cancer mortality.

PLTW connection and today's work

Open Activity 3.1.1 Who Is Affected by Cancer? in myPLTW and use the labeled microscopy images to compare normal, benign, and malignant tissue.

Today's stopping point: Monday debate should be posted; morphology comparison and diagnostic workflow due today before Thanksgiving break.

PLTW activity titles identify the course connection. If your account will not open, use the posted materials for today and tell Mr. Mendoza. Do not mark an online activity complete unless you completed it.

Course connection

  • Activity 3.1.1 Who Is Affected by Cancer?
Open Activity 3.1.1 Who Is Affected by Cancer? in myPLTW

Use the turn-in directions at the top of this page. Do not create a second submission unless your teacher asks for one.

Show another explanation or a smaller first step

Need help? Choose a starting point

Run the lab
Run the comparison: line up a benign and a malignant sample and record specific differences in cell size, shape (pleomorphism), and arrangement. Mark the metastasis image, explain in one line how it differs from a local tumor, and sketch the image-to-classification workflow in three steps.
Missed class? Start here
Absent today? Use the labeled images to do the smaller version: for each sample write just two words, one for cell shape and one for arrangement (for example 'uniform, orderly' vs 'ragged, invading'). That gives you the core comparison to submit and build the workflow from later.

Finish the assigned lab safely before starting extra practice.

Lesson resources: reading, slides, and vocabulary
Socratic teaching slide deck

The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.

Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.

Carry forward

Tracing each step of a plan to ranked evidence, and naming what would overturn it, is what separates clinical reasoning from a confident guess.

Daily take-home

cells lose their normal shape and break through boundaries, so a pathologist can read invasion and disorganization on a slide to judge whether a can metastasize and how dangerous it is.

Inspect the analogy

A mechanic studies a tool whose shape allows one job but limits another.

  1. Which feature makes the tool work?
  2. What changes if that feature bends or breaks?
  3. Which observation shows function rather than appearance?
Rule

Structure creates possibilities and limits for function.

Where it breaks

Living tissues adapt and interact with other systems; a metal tool does not.

Map the analogy to biology
  • Tool shape maps to .
  • The job maps to physiological function.
  • Damage maps to a predicted functional change.
Read this first

Driving question: Given three unlabeled slides, one normal, one benign, and one with cells crossing the border, how do you decide which patient's is most likely to spread and kill?

What you already know: Tracing each step of a plan to ranked evidence, and naming what would overturn it, is what separates clinical reasoning from a confident guess.

New idea: cells lose their normal shape and break through boundaries, so a pathologist can read invasion and disorganization on a slide to judge whether a can metastasize and how dangerous it is.

Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Microscopy image baseline. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Trace the labeled testing, treatment, or biological process and identify where evidence limits the decision.

  1. Observe or measure the relevant feature in microscopy image baseline.
  2. Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
  3. Apply this rule: Structure creates possibilities and limits for function.
  4. Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.

Real biomedical example: Given three unlabeled slides, one normal, one benign, and one with cells crossing the border, how do you decide which patient's is most likely to spread and kill?

What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.

What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.

Vocabulary:
  • : A group of diseases in which abnormal cells grow and divide uncontrollably, ignoring normal signals and sometimes spreading to other parts of the body.
  • : An abnormal mass of formed when cells grow and divide more than they should, which may be benign or .
  • benign: Not harmful or not cancerous; a benign stays in one place and does not spread, and a benign gene variant does not cause disease.
  • : Describing a that grows aggressively, invades nearby , and can spread to distant parts of the body, making it cancerous and dangerous.
  • : The spread of cells from the original through blood or to form new tumors in distant parts of the body.
  • : A mutated or overactive gene that drives uncontrolled cell growth and can turn a normal cell into a cell.
  • : A gene whose normally slows cell division or triggers cell death, so losing it can let cells grow uncontrolled into .

Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.

Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.

Evidence set and decision
E1 · Source fact

diagnosis and treatment planning integrate or molecular findings, stage, features, overall health, benefits, and harms; no single classroom image or marker determines the complete decision.

Limit: The composite classroom case cannot support a real diagnosis, stage, prognosis, or treatment recommendation.

E2 · Teaching model

Structure creates possibilities and limits for function.

Limit: Living tissues adapt and interact with other systems; a metal tool does not.

E3 · Task criterion

You can tell normal from abnormal morphology.

Limit: E3 defines the classroom product or success criterion. It is not independent scientific evidence and cannot justify a clinical or causal claim.

PLTW-GEND-2026-11-16 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario

Your role: medical interventions team member

Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from microscopy image baseline supports before submitting the lab report named on today's page.

  • Wait on the step until stage and overall health are added, since one slide cannot set the treatment.
  • Rank the slide with cells crossing the border as most dangerous, because invasion is what lets spread.
  • Call every growing on the slides dangerous, since a lump that keeps growing can spread.

Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the lab report.

Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about microscopy image baseline. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Composite case file · PLTW-GEND-2026-11-16

Reason for review: Your team must decide what the evidence from microscopy image baseline supports before submitting the lab report named on today's page.

Context: A pathologist reads in the itself. Normal cells are uniform and orderly, and the more a sample loses that order and starts invading, the more dangerous the cancer is, which is why a slide can drive a diagnosis and a .

Timeline:
  • T1: Open the labeled microscopy images in the shell and identify normal first.
  • T2: Compare a benign and a sample, noting differences in cell size, shape, and arrangement.
  • T3: Mark one image showing and explain in one line how it differs from a local .
  • T4: Sketch the diagnostic from image to classification in three steps.
  • T5: Submit your morphology comparison and sketch as your daily evidence.
Evidence records:
  • E1: diagnosis and treatment planning integrate or molecular findings, stage, features, overall health, benefits, and harms; no single classroom image or marker determines the complete decision.
  • E2: Structure creates possibilities and limits for function.
  • E3: You can tell normal from abnormal morphology.

Measurements: No patient measurement is supplied unless it appears explicitly in E1-E3 or F1. Do not invent a value.

Figure finding: Teaching diagram for Microscopy image baseline. Trace the labeled testing, treatment, or biological process and identify where evidence limits the decision. This is a teaching model, not patient or experimental data.

Uncertainty: This is a composite classroom scenario. Missing history, measurements, or confirmation tests remain unknown and limit the conclusion.

Watch the trap

Students often think Students think a is as soon as it grows, so any lump or growth must be dangerous and able to spread.. The trap: The trap is that benign tumors grow too, but they stay inside their boundary and do not invade or spread. What makes a is invasion: cells breaking out of the and traveling through blood or . Growth alone is not the danger, crossing the border is.

Worked example · a parallel case (guides, does not reveal)
Morphology comparison and diagnostic workflow
Completes: Completes the cancer-launch baseline task: a two-column comparison of benign versus malignant tissue morphology, a one-line metastasis explanation, and a three-step diagnostic workflow sketch.

Morphology comparison (benign vs. malignant):

  • Cell size and shape: benign cells are uniform and look alike; malignant cells are pleomorphic, meaning they vary in size and shape.
  • Tissue arrangement: benign tissue keeps an orderly, organized structure; malignant tissue is disorganized and loses normal architecture.
  • Boundaries: a benign tumor stays in one place with a clear edge; a malignant tumor pushes into and invades the surrounding tissue.

Metastasis (one line): The metastasis image differs from a local tumor because cancer cells have left the original site and traveled through blood or lymph to a distant organ, instead of staying put.

Diagnostic workflow (three steps):

1. Take a tissue sample (biopsy) and prepare it on a slide.

2. Examine the cells under the microscope for size, shape, and arrangement.

3. Classify the tumor as normal, benign, or malignant, and note any sign of invasion or spread.

FeatureBenign tissueMalignant tissue
Cell size and shapeUniform, alikePleomorphic, varied
ArrangementOrderly architectureDisorganized
BoundaryStays local, clear edgeInvades surrounding tissue
Comparison table: benign tissue is uniform, orderly, and local; malignant tissue is pleomorphic, disorganized, and invasive.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the cancer-launch baseline task: a two-column comparison of benign versus malignant tissue morphology, a one-line metastasis explanation, and a three-step diagnostic workflow sketch.

Build yours step by step
  1. State the question and method.
  2. Present the observations and data with units.
  3. Explain the result, limitations, and next investigation.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Submit your morphology comparison and workflow sketch to Schoology before end of block.

See the full worked example
Portal terms
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
This unit's vocabulary

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Add two of these to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Build your vocabulary · optional, for extra credit

Pick just 2 or 3 words from today and make them yours: write what each one means in your own words, name the context clue or evidence that helped, then give one example from what you actually did in Microscopy image baseline. Try your own words first; the glossary is there if you get stuck. This is voluntary and counts as extra credit, so keep it short.

cancer
tumor
benign
malignant
metastasis
oncogene

Saved on this device. Show Mr. Mendoza or add these to your notebook glossary to claim the extra credit.

Audio Resources

Play the cold open at the start of the unit to set the scene. Each recording is AI-generated and simulated (fictional callers, no real people or student data).

MI U3 - Tumor registry intake callActivity 3.1.1 Stories of CancerBlock 1 cold open (Registry Case 26-104)
Teacher-posted resources

Classroom documents for this lesson are posted in Schoology. Open Clever, then Schoology, and find each one by the name shown on its card.

Use during lessonFor: Everyone
Activity 3.1.3 When Cells Lose Control
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Open this when the class reaches this activity and use it to complete the required lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched launch, , diagnosis by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-3_How-to-Conquer-Cancer/3.1_Detecting-Cancer; keywords:cancer, , biopsy. Score 146. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Catch-up / reteachFor: Need extra support
MI Unit 3 Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment Unit Summary
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched launch, , diagnosis by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-3_How-to-Conquer-Cancer/00_Unit-Overview; keywords:cancer, diagnosis, osteosarcoma. Score 142. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Catch-up / reteachFor: Need extra support
Activity 3.1.2 Diagnostic Imaging
worksheet/handoutPosted in Schoology
Open in Schoology

Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.

Placement rationale

Matched launch, , diagnosis by path:Medical-Interventions/Unit-3_How-to-Conquer-Cancer/3.1_Detecting-Cancer; keywords:cancer, osteosarcoma. Score 138. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).

Sign in to Clever with your district Microsoft account to open Schoology or myPLTW. Follow today's posted steps. If myPLTW will not open, use the posted alternative and tell Mr. Mendoza. Turn in your completed work through the Schoology assignment.

Practice: try a question, then check your answer

Claim ceiling for this check: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about microscopy image baseline. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Quick self-check · commit, then reveal

You examine two tumor samples. Both are growing. In sample A the cells stay neatly inside the tissue boundary. In sample B the cells are pleomorphic and some have crossed into surrounding tissue. Which sample is malignant, and what single feature told you?

How sure are you?

Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.

Cumulative WebXam review · flash practice

Fast retrieval with instant answers, not the commit-then-reveal check above. Try each from memory first: write what you remember about the earlier units, then check yourself here.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: From Sample to Bands: Comparing Testing Methods] Restriction enzymes are used in genetic testing because they
[Review: Editing the Code: Gene Therapy and Its Ethics] One major challenge that keeps gene therapy from being perfect is complete integration, which means
[Review: Molecule to Patient: Unit 2 Synthesis] A genetic counselor's main role on the health care team is to
All cancers, despite their variety, share which fundamental characteristic?
Missed class or ready for more?
🔬 Pre-lab simulations · 2 for this lesson

Run this before you touch the bench. It is built from the real lab procedure, so the decisions you make here are the ones you will make with the equipment in your hands. This lesson has more than one, and they cover different skills.

Cancer Cell Morphology Under the Microscope
Open the simulation →
Sunscreen and UV: Protecting Yeast from Damage
Open the simulation →
Lab · prepare, conduct, complete
1Prepare
Pre-lab pass · clear all six to go to the bench
0/6

I can name the procedure's purpose and the evidence I will record. I can state today's specific hazards and the control for each. If this deck does not name them, I ask Mr. Mendoza before I touch anything. My data table is ready before materials are handled.

Finish the checklist before you handle any material.

Bring / set up
Printed or projected labeled microscopy images (normal, benign, malignant, metastasis examples)Two-column comparison worksheet or blank paper for morphology tableColored pencils or highlighters (optional, for annotating image printouts)Ruler or scale bar reference if measuring cell size from prints
Safety · specific to today's hazards
  • All materials are image-based; no wet lab hazards today.
  • Microscopy images are de-identified patient tissue samples; treat them as clinical data and do not photograph or share beyond the class.
  • If using a light microscope to view prepared slides, follow school lab safety protocol: carry microscope with two hands, report broken slides to the teacher immediately.
Review Lab Safety (rules, PPE, SDS, emergencies) and check your contract + test
2Conduct (Argument-Driven Inquiry)
  1. 1Before materials are handled, identify the purpose, variables or comparison, controls, measurement units, and stop-work condition.
  2. 2Open the labeled microscopy images in the shell and identify normal tissue first.
  3. 3Compare a benign and a malignant sample, noting differences in cell size, shape, and arrangement.
  4. 4Mark one image showing metastasis and explain in one line how it differs from a local tumor.
  5. 5Sketch the diagnostic workflow from image to tumor classification in three steps.
  6. 6Submit your morphology comparison and workflow sketch as your daily evidence.
  7. 7Record each result in the prepared table before interpreting it. Mark missing, repeated, or invalid results truthfully.
  8. 8Complete the named cleanup and waste route, remove PPE safely, wash hands when required, and confirm the station is ready for the next group.
Prepare this data table before materials are handled
Trial or sample IDIndependent conditionMeasured result with unitsObservation before interpretationQuality-control note
     
     
     
National Cancer Institute: What Is Cancer?
3Complete
Argue from your evidence, then compare what you predicted to what happened. Error analysis names a specific method limit, never "human error".
You predicted

Before the procedure, predict the result and cite the rule behind the prediction.

What actually happened

After the procedure, compare the result with the prediction and name one limitation or source of uncertainty.

Your lab report is graded on the rubric below, with extra weight on error analysis and method.
Where this leads: careers

What today's skills lead to. These are real health-science careers this course builds toward. Tap one to see, on the US Department of Labor's O*NET site, what the job actually involves, what it pays, and how fast it is growing.

What to do if you were absent
Today was a lab: do this instead

From home, work through the labeled morphology packet: compare normal, benign, and images, mark the example, and sketch the three-step diagnostic .

Labeled cancer morphology packet (PLTW course shell)

Use the submission route shown on today's page.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

National Cancer Institute: What Is Cancer?
Optional extra credit (async)

You've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home, including virtual labs, for extra credit. Each item shows its correct submission route.

Open the extra-credit track
How this is graded
For: Lab report: Two-column morphology comparison (benign vs. malignant), one-line metastasis explanation, and a three-step diagnostic workflow sketch.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Go to Schoology to turn this in. Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf. If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
  • Error analysis and method · counts double
    Name a specific limit of the method and how it moved your result, and compare what you predicted to what happened. "Human error" does not count; say what about the procedure or instrument caused it.