Wed, Dec 2, 2026Fall (Semester 1) · Week 15Day 51 of 6080-min blockTight fit

Surge and usability notes

Essential question: Why can accurate public-health information still fail to reach the people who need it during a surge?Enduring understanding: Good information delivered through a hard-to-use interface does not reach people, so usability is part of whether a public-health message works, not an extra.

Do now

Students take notes on medical surge, mobile response facilities, and usability principles for public-health apps, then complete the PLTW online task.

DueTonight, 11:29 PM
Hand in
Annotated notes listing three usability principles with health-app examples, a sketch connecting user needs to a feature list, and one trust-building communication strategy.
Where
Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not.

You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

Where you are · this course
Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. Surge and usability notes ▸ Day 2
Day 51 of 60 this semester9 left before WebXam
🧬 Where you are · PLTW
Principles of Biomedical ScienceUnit 3: Outbreaks and Emergencies ▸ Lesson 3.3 Information Sharing"Activity 3.3.1 User-centered Design", "Problem 3.3.2 Public Health Emergency Apps"
Activity names previewed from public PLTW district curriculum maps for the updated PBS. Mr. Mendoza will confirm the exact numbers in myPLTW once the course shell opens.
Today's driving question

A city pushes out a correct alert telling residents which mobile clinics are open, but half the people who open the app close it without finding the location. What about the design, not the facts, made a true message useless?

Today you'll be able to

Students take notes on , mobile response facilities, and usability principles for public-health apps, then complete the PLTW online task.

You've got it when
  • Name three usability principles relevant to a health app.
  • Submit the PLTW online task fully completed.
Due today · Notebook check RequiredAnnotated notes listing three usability principles with health-app examples, a sketch connecting user needs to a feature list, and one trust-building communication strategy.
Do-Now · start these with your notes closed
  1. Name one app you gave up on because it was confusing, and what stopped you.
  2. If a health alert took four taps to reach, would most people finish? Why or why not?
Do this · step by step
numbered so we can always find our place
  1. 1Annotate notes on medical-surge planning and mobile facility design.
  2. 2List the core usability principles for a public-facing health app.
  3. 3Connect clear public-health communication to user trust and uptake.
  4. 4Sketch how user needs drive an app feature list.
  5. 5Complete the assigned PLTW online activity on surge response and design.
Interrupted or lost? Interrupted? Your notes move through five steps: surge and mobile-facility design, the core usability principles, the link from clear communication to trust, a sketch of how user needs drive features, then the PLTW online activity. Pick up at the first one you have not finished.
The story

What did this day actually feel like?

Surge and usability notes

Medical surge planning, mobile facility design, then usability principles for public-facing health apps. The connection is that public health communication fails when the message is accurate but the delivery is unusable.

Correct information in a bad interface does not reach anyone.

That felt like a different subject for about ten minutes and then it did not. A public-health message nobody can act on has the same practical result as no message.

Kept in the notebook for the design project.

Fiction. There is no such student. The lessons, labs and dates are the real planned course; the student, the classmates and the conversations are invented.

The comic

The same day, drawn.

Drawing, panel 71: Surge and usability.

Public health communication fails when the message is accurate but the delivery is unusable.

Panel 71Surge and usability · 2026-12-02
Read week 15, 5 panels

Fiction. There is no such student. The lessons, labs and dates are the real planned course; the student, the classmates and the conversations are invented.

🛠 Get unstuck · pick your level

Need a running start
Before the notes, list two things that make any app easy or annoying to use. You will meet these same ideas as the formal usability principles, so you are naming them early.
On track
Take notes that define learnability, efficiency, error tolerance, and satisfaction, connect clear communication to user trust, and finish the PLTW online activity on surge response and design.
Stuck? Get unstuck
Absent? Read the notes on usability principles and write one sentence per principle explaining how a bad version of it would lose a scared user during a surge, then attempt the PLTW activity.
Push me further
Pick a real public-health app you have used and rate it on all four usability principles with one concrete example each, then name the single change that would raise uptake the most.

🔑 Today's words · 5

surge capacitymobile carepublic healthsurveillancecommunication
+1 more in the word bank

Tap a word in the lesson for a plain meaning and one example. Recycled into next week's Do-Now.

Today's study notebook
Public-health surge capacity and designing tools people can use under pressure.
Open the notebook
Watch first: today's 1-minute intro
Audio overviewVideo overviewMind mapStudy guideFlashcardsQuizData table
Where this fits
Tested on (Ohio WebXam)
Principles and Practice of Biomedical Technology · 072110
PLTW lesson
PBS · Lesson 3.3 Information Sharing
WebXam domain
Biotechnology Research and Experiments
Evidence to produce
Notebook check
Do the work · 80-minute blockfirst 5 min = hook

💡 Big idea: A public-health message reaches people only when the interface is usable, so accurate information in a bad interface fails because users abandon it before they act.

  1. 0-5 minWarm-up: name one app you use in an emergency and one thing that makes it fast to use.
  2. 5-28 minTeacher-led notes: medical-surge planning, mobile facility types, and deployment criteria.
  3. 28-45 minNotes: usability principles (learnability, efficiency, error tolerance, satisfaction) with health-app examples.
  4. 45-55 minConnect communication clarity to user trust; sketch how user needs produce a feature list.
  5. 55-75 minPLTW online activity on surge response and design (individual, self-paced).
  6. 75-80 minExit check: name three usability principles and one health-app example for each.
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Wednesday your team designs a surge communication app: today's notes give you the principles to justify every design choice.
  • Usability is not aesthetics: it is whether a frightened person in a crisis can figure out the app in 10 seconds.
  • WebXam 072110 connects biotechnology and data handling to public-health communication tools.
  • Finish the PLTW activity today: the platform covers the same usability framework your Wednesday wireframe will use.
Know by the end
  • Mobile surge facilities require usability planning just as apps do: the target user's needs drive every design choice.
  • Core usability principles include learnability, efficiency, error tolerance, and satisfaction.
  • User trust in a public-health app depends on clear language, reliable updates, and minimal cognitive load.
Open this PLTW section today

Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. · Surge and usability notes

Day 2 of this lesson. Open this exact section in myPLTW (find it in Clever, Microsoft sign-in), then do the work below.

Do this: Open myPLTW, navigate to Lesson 3.3 Information Sharing, and find the online activity on surge response and usability design.

Complete

Complete all questions and submit before end of period.

How far to get

You submitted the surge-resource ethics reflection Monday. Today finish the full Lesson 3.3 surge-and-usability activity so Wednesday's design project uses the same principles.

Upload as evidence

Show completion confirmation to teacher before leaving.

The official PLTW activity stays inside myPLTW. If myPLTW will not open, use F1 and E1-E3 on this page to complete today's local evidence decision, then make up the official activity when access returns. Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not.

Today's PLTW tracker · fill in and submit

Check things off as you work, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible through the submission route shown below.

Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.

Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept.Day 2 of this projectSee the full week plan
Today's PLTW target

Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. · Surge and usability notes

Open myPLTW, navigate to Lesson 3.3 Information Sharing, and find the online activity on surge response and usability design.

You submitted the surge-resource ethics reflection Monday. Today finish the full Lesson 3.3 surge-and-usability activity so Wednesday's design project uses the same principles.

This is how Mr. Mendoza sees the class keeping pace with PLTW. Be honest, it only helps if it is accurate.

1 · What you do today

🎯 Students take notes on , mobile response facilities, and usability principles for public-health apps, then complete the PLTW online task.

  • Annotate notes on medical-surge planning and mobile facility design.
  • List the core usability principles for a public-facing health app.
  • Connect clear public-health communication to user trust and uptake.
  • Sketch how user needs drive an app feature list.
  • Complete the assigned PLTW online activity on surge response and design.
2 · What you turn in

Notebook check: Annotated notes listing three usability principles with health-app examples, a sketch connecting user needs to a feature list, and one trust-building communication strategy.

Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not. Use the checklist just below and upload by 11:29 PM for full credit. Absent with an excused absence? You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

3 · Who's doing what (team)
TaskWho
Annotate notes on medical-surge planning and mobile facility design._______
List the core usability principles for a public-facing health app._______
Connect clear public-health communication to user trust and uptake._______
Sketch how user needs drive an app feature list._______
Complete the assigned PLTW online activity on surge response and design._______

Working solo? Put your own name in "Who" for every row.

4 · Words I can use correctly
5 · I'm successful today when I can…
  • Name three usability principles relevant to a health app.
  • Submit the PLTW online task fully completed.
6 · Reflection & next steps
Where are you today?0/7 checked
Pick your period and code first.
Your 4 steps today
  1. 1
    Do this
    Students take notes on medical surge, mobile response facilities, and usability principles for public-health apps, then complete the PLTW online task.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Submit this
    Notebook check: Annotated notes listing three usability principles with health-app examples, a sketch connecting user needs to a feature list, and one trust-building communication strategy.
  4. 4
    Submit it here
    1. 1Open the drop folder.
    2. 2Sign in with your district Microsoft account, not a personal one.
    3. 3Upload the file, named Lastname_Firstname__Assignment Title.
    4. 4Your own upload panel says Uploaded with a green check: that is your receipt.
    Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not. Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science) › Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. › Notebook check
    Open the drop folder
Were you absent? Jump to the make-up plan
Learn it · deck, reading, and vocabulary
Socratic teaching slide deck

The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.

Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.

Carry forward

Where a community sends limited surge resources determines who gets care, so deployment location is an equity decision and not just a logistics one.

Daily take-home

A public-health message reaches people only when the interface is usable, so accurate information in a bad interface fails because users abandon it before they act.

Inspect the analogy

A detective board holds observations, possible explanations, and one next question.

  1. Which notes are direct observations?
  2. Which notes are explanations?
  3. What new evidence would separate the explanations?
Rule

Keep observations separate from explanations, then collect the evidence that can distinguish the options.

Where it breaks

Biomedical investigations use controlled procedures and validated measurements, not intuition alone.

Map the analogy to biology
  • Board notes map to E1-E3.
  • Possible explanations map to the decision options.
  • The next question maps to the evidence-based action.
Read this first

Driving question: A city pushes out a correct alert telling residents which mobile clinics are open, but half the people who open the app close it without finding the location. What about the design, not the facts, made a true message useless?

What you already know: Where a community sends limited surge resources determines who gets care, so deployment location is an equity decision and not just a logistics one.

New idea: A public-health message reaches people only when the interface is usable, so accurate information in a bad interface fails because users abandon it before they act.

Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Surge and usability notes. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Trace the labeled observation or evidence sequence before choosing an explanation.

  1. Observe or measure the relevant feature in Surge and usability notes.
  2. Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
  3. Apply this rule: Keep observations separate from explanations, then collect the evidence that can distinguish the options.
  4. Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.

Real biomedical example: A city pushes out a correct alert telling residents which mobile clinics are open, but half the people who open the app close it without finding the location. What about the design, not the facts, made a true message useless?

What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.

What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.

Vocabulary:
  • : A health system's ability to rapidly expand staff, beds, and supplies to handle a sudden jump in patients during an emergency or outbreak.
  • : Healthcare delivered to people where they are, using vehicles or portable units to reach communities far from a fixed clinic or hospital.
  • : The science of protecting and improving the health of whole communities through prevention, education, and policies rather than treating one patient at a time.
  • surveillance: The ongoing, systematic collection and analysis of health data to detect disease early, track its trends, and trigger a timely response.
  • communication: Sharing information clearly and accurately between people, which in healthcare keeps patients safe and helps teams coordinate care.
  • usability: How easy, efficient, and satisfying a product is for its intended users to learn and use to reach their goals.

Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.

Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.

Evidence set and decision
E1 · Observation

Mobile surge facilities require usability planning just as apps do: the target user's needs drive every design choice.

Limit: E1 supplies context or an observation; it does not by itself establish the explanation.

E2 · Mechanism

A public-health message reaches people only when the interface is usable, so accurate information in a bad interface fails because users abandon it before they act.

Limit: E2 is a teaching statement or comparison and must be checked against the task evidence.

E3 · Result

Name three usability principles relevant to a health app.

Limit: E3 supports only the result or product criterion named here; it cannot justify a broader clinical or causal claim.

PLTW-PBT-2026-12-02 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario

Your role: biomedical investigator

Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from Surge and usability notes supports before submitting the notebook record named on the lesson page.

  • Select the option best supported by E1-E3.
  • Select a reasonable alternative and name the evidence it would require.
  • Delay the claim because the evidence does not distinguish the options.

Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the notebook record.

Claim ceiling: The supplied lesson evidence can support an observation, pattern, classroom mechanism, or next-step decision about Surge and usability notes. It cannot by itself prove causation, establish a real clinical diagnosis, or justify action outside this classroom task.

Math moment
Formula or setup

Mean = sum of values / number of values. Median = middle ordered value. Range = maximum - minimum.

Worked parallel example

For 2, 4, 4, and 10: mean = 20 / 4 = 5, median = 4, and range = 10 - 2 = 8.

Units and reasonableness

Mean, median, and range keep the measurement unit. Order the values before finding the median.

Try it with today's data

Calculate the requested summary for today's supplied values, then write what it reveals and what it hides.

Design record
Criteria
  • The solution must address the stated need in Surge and usability notes.
  • The decision must be supported by E1-E3.
  • The final product must make the success criteria visible.
Constraints
  • Complete the work inside the 80-minute block.
  • Use only supplied or teacher-approved materials and evidence.
  • Do not trade , accessibility, or privacy for speed.
Tradeoff weights
  • and evidence quality: must pass before scoring other criteria.
  • User need and effectiveness: highest scored criterion.
  • Time, cost, and ease of use: compare only after and effectiveness pass.

Test evidence: For each option, record the E1-E3 result that supports or fails each criterion. Do not assign a score without a named observation.

Iteration log
  1. Version or option tested
  2. Criterion met or missed
  3. Evidence ID and result
  4. Revision made
  5. Reason for the revision
Decision record
  1. Need and user
  2. Criteria and constraints
  3. Chosen option and evidence
  4. Test result
  5. Revision and reason
Watch the trap

Students often think Students believe that if the health information is accurate and complete, the communication has done its job and design is just decoration.. The trap: That is a trap, because a message only counts if a stressed person can actually find and act on it. In a surge people are scared and rushed, so a confusing interface loses them before the accurate content ever helps, which means usability is part of the message, not a coat of paint.

Worked example · a parallel case (guides, does not reveal)
Annotated surge and usability notes
Completes: Completes the surge and design note-taking task: three usability principles with examples, a user-needs-to-feature sketch, and one trust-building strategy.

Three usability principles (with health-app examples):

  • Learnability: a first-time user can figure it out fast. Example: a clear 'Find a clinic near me' button on the home screen.
  • Efficiency: frequent tasks take few steps. Example: check wait times in one tap, not five.
  • Error tolerance: mistakes are easy to recover from. Example: a confirmation step before submitting symptoms, with an 'edit' option.

(A fourth, satisfaction, means the experience feels trustworthy and not stressful.)

User needs drive features (sketch in words):

  • User need: 'I do not know if it is safe to go to the ER.' -> Feature: live ER wait-time and capacity indicator.
  • User need: 'I do not speak English well.' -> Feature: language toggle.
  • User need: 'I have no data plan.' -> Feature: low-bandwidth text-only mode.

Trust-building strategy:

  • Show the source and time of every update ('Updated 10 min ago by County Health'). People act on information they believe is current and official, which is critical during a surge.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the surge and design note-taking task: three usability principles with examples, a user-needs-to-feature sketch, and one trust-building strategy.

Build yours step by step
  1. Date and label the entry.
  2. Record the procedure, observation, or design decision clearly.
  3. End with what the evidence means and the next step.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Complete the assigned PLTW online activity on surge response and design, then keep your notes for the design project.

See the full worked example
Portal terms
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
This unit's vocabulary

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Add two of these to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Build your vocabulary · optional, for extra credit

Pick just 2 or 3 words from today and make them yours: write what each one means in your own words, name the context clue or evidence that helped, then give one example from what you actually did in Surge and usability notes. Try your own words first; the glossary is there if you get stuck. This is voluntary and counts as extra credit, so keep it short.

surge capacity
mobile care
public health
surveillance
communication
usability

Saved on this device. Show Mr. Mendoza or add these to your notebook glossary to claim the extra credit.

Resources & readings

Hand-picked readings and interactives for this lesson, from authoritative open organizations and PLTW's own public course outline.

Check yourself · commit, then reveal

Claim ceiling for this check: The supplied lesson evidence can support an observation, pattern, classroom mechanism, or next-step decision about Surge and usability notes. It cannot by itself prove causation, establish a real clinical diagnosis, or justify action outside this classroom task.

Quick self-check · commit, then reveal

A surge app is completely accurate but requires a login, three taps, and a scroll to reach the open-clinic list. Which usability principle is it failing most, and what would that cost in a surge?

How sure are you?

Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.

Cumulative WebXam review · flash practice

Fast retrieval with instant answers, not the commit-then-reveal check above. Try each from memory first: write what you remember about the earlier units, then check yourself here.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Nosocomial Nightmare: the chain of infection and how to break it] During plating, why is a face shield considered user PPE rather than sample PPE?
[Review: Outbreak Evidence: line lists, epidemic curves, and identifying the agent] To confirm the causative agent of a foodborne outbreak, what evidence is most definitive?
[Review: Emergency Response: assessment, triage, and stabilization] A solution at pH 2 must be made safe for disposal. What target pH should you aim for?
When presenting surveillance data to decision-makers, what makes a data display most usable?
Go further and get help
Where this leads: careers
What to do if you were absent
If YOU are absent

Today is individual work you can do from home: complete the same target above, then submit your Notebook check.

Open the drop folder

Turn this in at the drop folder with your district Microsoft sign-in, or hand it to Mr. Mendoza in class. Both count as submitted. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

Ready.gov: pandemic and large-scale health emergencies
Optional extra credit (async)

You've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home, including virtual labs, for extra credit. Each item shows its correct submission route.

Open the extra-credit track
How this is graded
For: Notebook check: Annotated notes listing three usability principles with health-app examples, a sketch connecting user needs to a feature list, and one trust-building communication strategy.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Turned in the right way, on the class site or handed to Mr. Mendoza in class, and confirmed. Not in Schoology: that is where the report-card grade appears later.