This class runs in two periods and they do not do the same lesson on the same day. You are reading the Period 6A-7B calendar, the one with John Carroll bioethics on Mondays.
Surge resource debate
Do now
Students debate how a community should prioritize mobile medical resources during a public-health surge.
- Hand in
- One sentence recording the strongest opposing argument heard during the surge resource debate.
- Where
- Submit this on the class form named on this page. The form requires the student's district Microsoft sign-in. The thank-you page is the submission receipt. A physical handoff counts only when the day page names that route. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not count as submitted.
You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.
If the form offers you a saved draft, choose New draft. If the Assignment box comes up empty, type it exactly: Surge resource debate
A region suddenly has more sick patients than its hospitals can hold, and you control one mobile response unit. Do you park it downtown where the crowds are, or in an underserved neighborhood where people already struggle to reach a clinic?
Students debate how a community should prioritize mobile medical resources during a public-health surge.
- • Defend a clear deployment position with two evidence points.
- • Use surge-response vocabulary correctly during the debate.
- In your own words, what does it mean when a hospital is in ?
- If your family suddenly could not get into the nearest ER, where would you go instead?
- 1Read a case where a region faces a sudden beyond capacity.
- 2Choose a stance on deploying mobile facilities to dense versus underserved areas.
- 3Gather two arguments using medical-surge and access examples.
- 4Debate using terms like , mobile response, and public-health communication.
- 5Record the strongest opposing point you heard.
What did this day actually feel like?
Surge and usability notes
Medical surge planning, mobile facility design, then usability principles for public-facing health apps. The connection is that public health communication fails when the message is accurate but the delivery is unusable.
Correct information in a bad interface does not reach anyone.
That felt like a different subject for about ten minutes and then it did not. A public-health message nobody can act on has the same practical result as no message.
Kept in the notebook for the design project.
Fiction. There is no such student. The lessons, labs and dates are the real planned course; the student, the classmates and the conversations are invented.
The same day, drawn.
The equity version of the triage question, scaled from one room to a whole region. Same structure. I noticed the structure this time.
Fiction. There is no such student. The lessons, labs and dates are the real planned course; the student, the classmates and the conversations are invented.
🛠 Get unstuck · pick your level
🔑 Today's words · 5
Tap a word in the lesson for a plain meaning and one example. Recycled into next week's Do-Now.
Check you have the right sheet: the top of it prints today's portal day, Surge resource debate. The PLTW activity itself is in myPLTW and is not posted here.
Do the work · 80-minute blockfirst 5 min = hook▸
💡 Big idea: Where a community sends limited surge resources determines who gets care, so deployment location is an equity decision and not just a logistics one.
- 0-8 minRead the surge case; annotate which community group you think is most vulnerable.
- 8-18 minDefine , mobile response facility, and public-health communication.
- 18-35 minBuild two-point argument for your deployment stance.
- 35-60 minStructured debate; teacher tracks vocabulary use.
- 60-72 minRecord the strongest opposing point.
- 72-80 minWhole-class debrief; preview Wednesday design project.
- • A pandemic, a mass disaster, or a disease cluster can overwhelm hospitals within hours.
- • Today you debate where the mobile resources go: dense population center or underserved community.
- • WebXam 072110 Biotechnology strand connects public-health infrastructure decisions to disease prevention outcomes.
- • The opposing argument you record is the equity concern you will need to address in Thursday's CER.
- • occurs when patient demand exceeds the normal capacity of a healthcare system.
- • Mobile response facilities can extend capacity geographically, but deployment location determines who benefits.
- • Public-health communication during a surge affects whether people seek care or stay home.
Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. · Surge resource debate
Day 1 of this lesson. Open this exact section in myPLTW (find it in Clever, Microsoft sign-in), then do the work below.
Do this: In myPLTW, open Lesson 3.2 Emergency Response and go to Activity 3.2.5 . Start it before the debate.
Mark Activity 3.2.5 started in myPLTW before the debate begins.
You finished the response-analysis CER last week. Today is Activity 3.2.5 , which sits in Lesson 3.2 Emergency Response. Lesson 3.3 Information Sharing starts tomorrow. Start the activity within the first 18 minutes.
Your submission in Activity 3.2.5 plus a handwritten opposing-point note.
The official PLTW activity stays inside myPLTW. If myPLTW will not open, use F1 and E1-E3 on this page to complete today's local evidence decision, then make up the official activity when access returns. Submit this on the class form named on this page. The form requires the student's district Microsoft sign-in. The thank-you page is the submission receipt. A physical handoff counts only when the day page names that route. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not count as submitted.
Check things off as you work, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible through the submission route shown below.
Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.
Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. · Surge resource debate
In myPLTW, open Lesson 3.2 Emergency Response and go to Activity 3.2.5 . Start it before the debate.
You finished the response-analysis CER last week. Today is Activity 3.2.5 , which sits in Lesson 3.2 Emergency Response. Lesson 3.3 Information Sharing starts tomorrow. Start the activity within the first 18 minutes.
This is how Mr. Mendoza sees the class keeping pace with PLTW. Be honest, it only helps if it is accurate.
🎯 Students debate how a community should prioritize mobile medical resources during a public-health surge.
- Read a case where a region faces a sudden beyond capacity.
- Choose a stance on deploying mobile facilities to dense versus underserved areas.
- Gather two arguments using medical-surge and access examples.
- Debate using terms like , mobile response, and public-health communication.
- Record the strongest opposing point you heard.
Exit ticket: One sentence recording the strongest opposing argument heard during the surge resource debate.
Submit this on the class form named on this page. The form requires the student's district Microsoft sign-in. The thank-you page is the submission receipt. A physical handoff counts only when the day page names that route. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not count as submitted. Use the checklist just below and upload by 11:29 PM for full credit. Absent with an excused absence? You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.
| Task | Who |
|---|---|
| Read a case where a region faces a sudden beyond capacity. | _______ |
| Choose a stance on deploying mobile facilities to dense versus underserved areas. | _______ |
| Gather two arguments using medical-surge and access examples. | _______ |
| Debate using terms like , mobile response, and public-health communication. | _______ |
| Record the strongest opposing point you heard. | _______ |
Working solo? Put your own name in "Who" for every row.
- Defend a clear deployment position with two evidence points.
- Use surge-response vocabulary correctly during the debate.
- 1Do thisStudents debate how a community should prioritize mobile medical resources during a public-health surge.
- 2Use this resource
- 3Submit thisExit ticket: One sentence recording the strongest opposing argument heard during the surge resource debate.
- 4Submit it here
- 1Open the form. It must say For students at the top: if it says For parents and guardians, press Back and pick I am the student.
- 2If it offers you a saved draft, choose New draft: an old draft brings back the old assignment.
- 3Sign in with your district Microsoft account, not a personal one.
- 4Check the Assignment box says today's assignment from this page, then pick your period and type your student ID, all nine digits.
- 5Attach your file and press Submit. The thank-you page is your receipt.
Submit this on the class form named on this page. The form requires the student's district Microsoft sign-in. The thank-you page is the submission receipt. A physical handoff counts only when the day page names that route. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not count as submitted. Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science) › Unit 3.2 to 3.3: Medical surge, mobile response facility, public-health communication, app design concept. › Exit ticketTurn it in
Learn it · deck, reading, and vocabulary▸
The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.
Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.
You evaluate a decision against the logged evidence and the information you had, not against the final outcome, because outcomes depend partly on severity and chance, so only the evidence-based review reliably points to the next protocol improvement.
Where a community sends limited surge resources determines who gets care, so deployment location is an equity decision and not just a logistics one.
A review board sorts scientific evidence, stakeholder needs, possible benefits, possible burdens, and uncertainty before choosing a policy.
- Which statements are scientific evidence?
- Which statements express a value or priority?
- Who receives the benefit and who carries the burden?
Use science to estimate consequences, then state the value judgment and tradeoff that determine the decision.
A review-board model organizes reasoning but does not make one ethical principle automatically outweigh every other principle.
- • Evidence cards map to source-backed findings.
- • Stakeholder cards map to affected people and priorities.
- • The recommendation maps to an explicit tradeoff with a named uncertainty.
Driving question: A region suddenly has more sick patients than its hospitals can hold, and you control one mobile response unit. Do you park it downtown where the crowds are, or in an underserved neighborhood where people already struggle to reach a clinic?
What you already know: You evaluate a decision against the logged evidence and the information you had, not against the final outcome, because outcomes depend partly on severity and chance, so only the evidence-based review reliably points to the next protocol improvement.
New idea: Where a community sends limited surge resources determines who gets care, so deployment location is an equity decision and not just a logistics one.
Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Surge resource debate. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Use the labels and arrows in F1 to identify the relationship that supports Surge resource debate.
- Observe or measure the relevant feature in surge resource debate.
- Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
- Apply this rule: Use science to estimate consequences, then state the value judgment and tradeoff that determine the decision.
- Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.
Real biomedical example: A region suddenly has more sick patients than its hospitals can hold, and you control one mobile response unit. Do you park it downtown where the crowds are, or in an underserved neighborhood where people already struggle to reach a clinic?
What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.
What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.
- • : A health system's ability to rapidly expand staff, beds, and supplies to handle a sudden jump in patients during an emergency or outbreak.
- • : Healthcare delivered to people where they are, using vehicles or portable units to reach communities far from a fixed clinic or hospital.
- • : The science of protecting and improving the health of whole communities through prevention, education, and policies rather than treating one patient at a time.
- • surveillance: The ongoing, systematic collection and analysis of health data to detect disease early, track its trends, and trigger a timely response.
- • communication: Sharing information clearly and accurately between people, which in healthcare keeps patients safe and helps teams coordinate care.
- • usability: Use the lesson context and glossary entry to explain usability in your own words.
Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.
Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.
A defensible biomedical decision separates scientific evidence from value judgments, identifies who may benefit or be burdened, and states the uncertainty and tradeoffs that remain.
Limit: Scientific evidence can inform the options and likely consequences, but it cannot choose a single value-neutral answer.
Use science to estimate consequences, then state the value judgment and tradeoff that determine the decision.
Limit: A review-board model organizes reasoning but does not make one ethical principle automatically outweigh every other principle.
Defend a clear deployment position with two evidence points.
Limit: E3 defines the classroom product or success criterion. It is not independent scientific evidence and cannot justify a clinical or causal claim.
PLTW-PBT@P67-2026-12-02 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario
Your role: biomedical team member
Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from surge resource debate supports before submitting the exit response named on the lesson page.
- • Select the option best supported by E1-E3.
- • Select a reasonable alternative and name the evidence it would require.
- • Delay the claim because the evidence does not distinguish the options.
Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the exit response.
Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about surge resource debate. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.
Reason for review: Your team must decide what the evidence from surge resource debate supports before submitting the exit response named on the lesson page.
Context: During a , deploying limited resources is an equity decision as much as a logistics one, because where you place capacity determines who actually gets care.
- • T1: Read a case where a region faces a sudden beyond capacity.
- • T2: Choose a stance on deploying mobile facilities to dense versus underserved areas.
- • T3: Gather two arguments using medical-surge and access examples.
- • T4: Debate using terms like , mobile response, and public-health communication.
- • T5: Record the strongest opposing point you heard.
- • E1: A defensible biomedical decision separates scientific evidence from value judgments, identifies who may benefit or be burdened, and states the uncertainty and tradeoffs that remain.
- • E2: Use science to estimate consequences, then state the value judgment and tradeoff that determine the decision.
- • E3: Defend a clear deployment position with two evidence points.
Measurements: Use only the measurements, units, graph, or counts supplied in today's task. No additional patient measurement is implied.
Figure finding: Teaching diagram for Surge resource debate. Use the labels and arrows to identify the decision-relevant relationship. This is a teaching model, not patient or experimental data.
Uncertainty: This is a composite classroom scenario. Missing history, measurements, or confirmation tests remain unknown and limit the conclusion.
Mean = sum of values / number of values. Median = middle ordered value. Range = maximum - minimum.
For 2, 4, 4, and 10: mean = 20 / 4 = 5, median = 4, and range = 10 - 2 = 8.
Mean, median, and range keep the measurement unit. Order the values before finding the median.
Calculate the requested summary for today's supplied values, then write what it reveals and what it hides.
- • The solution must address the stated need in surge resource debate.
- • The decision must be supported by E1-E3.
- • The final product must make the success criteria visible.
- • Complete the work inside the 80-minute block.
- • Use only supplied or teacher-approved materials and evidence.
- • Do not trade , accessibility, or privacy for speed.
- • and evidence quality: must pass before scoring other criteria.
- • User need and effectiveness: highest scored criterion.
- • Time, cost, and ease of use: compare only after and effectiveness pass.
Test evidence: For each option, record the E1-E3 result that supports or fails each criterion. Do not assign a score without a named observation.
- Version or option tested
- Criterion met or missed
- Evidence ID and result
- Revision made
- Reason for the revision
- Need and user
- Criteria and constraints
- Chosen option and evidence
- Test result
- Revision and reason
Students often think Students assume the fairest move is to send the mobile unit wherever the largest number of sick people already are, because helping the most people at once sounds obviously right.. The trap: That is a trap, because the biggest crowd is usually near hospitals that already exist, so piling capacity there can leave underserved areas with zero access. Fairness during a surge means weighing existing access, not just raw headcount, so the count alone does not settle the decision.
Parallel case (not today's prompt): A clinic receives only enough seasonal flu vaccine to cover half the people who want it this week. It can send the doses to a nearby nursing home where residents face high risk of severe illness, or hold them at a walk-in site downtown where far more people pass through each day. Which group should get the limited doses first?\n\nClaim: The limited flu doses should go to the nursing home residents first.\n\nEvidence: Older adults in congregate settings have much higher rates of hospitalization and death from influenza than the general public, and a single outbreak can spread quickly through a shared-living facility. Vaccinating a smaller, high-risk group prevents more severe cases than spreading the same doses thinly across a lower-risk crowd.\n\nReasoning: When a health system cannot cover everyone at once, the fair test is not who is easiest to reach but where each dose prevents the most serious harm. Because the residents are both more likely to get dangerously sick and more likely to spread illness to one another, protecting them first uses a scarce public-health resource where it does the most good.\n\nStrongest opposing argument I would have to answer: The downtown site reaches many more people per day, so placing the doses there could slow community spread faster and shield more of the total population, which during a real surge might protect more people overall.\n\n(Tip: notice the shape to copy for today. Name your Claim in one clear sentence, back it with Evidence that is actually true, explain in the Reasoning why that evidence supports the claim, and state the strongest opposing point in one fair sentence using surge vocabulary like medical surge, mobile response, or public-health communication. Model the format here, then argue your own deployment question yourself.)
This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Models the debate exit task on a parallel resource-allocation case (limited flu vaccine doses) so students can see the Claim, Evidence, Reasoning format and depth without seeing an answer to today's mobile-unit deployment prompt.
- Name the prompt or task.
- Answer it directly with the key evidence.
- Check that the response matches the requested format.
Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.
Also due today: Hand in your exit-ticket card, or turn it in on the class site under today's exit-ticket.
- CER:
- Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
- SOP:
- Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
- Tracker:
- Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
- myPLTW:
- The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
Tap the speaker to hear a term. Add two of these to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.
Pick just 2 or 3 words from today and make them yours: write what each one means in your own words, name the context clue or evidence that helped, then give one example from what you actually did in Surge resource debate. Try your own words first; the glossary is there if you get stuck. This is voluntary and counts as extra credit, so keep it short.
Saved on this device. Show Mr. Mendoza or add these to your notebook glossary to claim the extra credit.
Hand-picked readings and interactives for this lesson, from authoritative open organizations and PLTW's own public course outline.
Check yourself · commit, then reveal▸
Claim ceiling for this check: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about surge resource debate. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.
A county has one mobile unit. Downtown has 800 sick people beside three hospitals; a far East Side district has 200 sick people and no clinic within 40 minutes. Which placement better closes the access gap, and why?
Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.
Fast retrieval with instant answers, not the commit-then-reveal check above. Try each from memory first: write what you remember about the earlier units, then check yourself here.
Go further and get help▸
What today's skills lead to. These are real health-science careers this course builds toward. Tap one to see, on the US Department of Labor's O*NET site, what the job actually involves, what it pays, and how fast it is growing.
Structured debate: During a surge, should mobile facilities deploy to high-density or underserved areas first? Assign two teams.
Ready.gov: PandemicThen submit your Exit ticket. Submit this on the class form named on this page. The form requires the student's district Microsoft sign-in. The thank-you page is the submission receipt. A physical handoff counts only when the day page names that route. Doing the activity in myPLTW does not count as submitted.
Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:
Ready.gov: pandemic and large-scale health emergenciesYou've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home, including virtual labs, for extra credit. Each item shows its correct submission route.
Open the extra-credit track- CompleteEvery required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
- AccurateThe science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
- Scientific reasoningYou explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
- Professional communicationClear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
- SubmittedTurned in through the one route named under Submit here and confirmed by the form receipt or the named physical handoff. Not in Schoology: that is where the report-card grade appears later.