Fri, Oct 30, 2026Fall (Semester 1) · Week 10Day 48 of 7580-min block

Clinical diagnosis team project

Today's target

Student teams synthesize patient data to propose and justify a working diagnosis.

Due today · Data table Required

Shared team evidence table with all four workup components, flagged out-of-range values, and a ranked differential diagnosis with the top candidate selected.

Your 4 steps today
  1. 1
    Do this
    Student teams synthesize patient data to propose and justify a working diagnosis.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Submit this
    Data table: Shared team evidence table with all four workup components, flagged out-of-range values, and a ranked differential diagnosis with the top candidate selected.
  4. 4
    Submit it here
    1. 1CMSD website. Go to clevelandmetroschools.org and click the Clever button.
    2. 2Clever. Clever opens. Sign in if it asks.
    3. 3Microsoft (district) login. Use your district Microsoft account (the one for school).
    4. 4Schoology. Open Schoology, then your class, then Assignments, and find the file named below.
    The file to submit is named: Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science) › Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. › Data table
    Open Schoology
Were you absent? Jump to the make-up plan
Where this fits
Tested on (Ohio WebXam)
Principles and Practice of Biomedical Technology · 072110
PLTW lesson
PBS · Clinical diagnosis team project
WebXam domain
Biotechnology Research and Experiments
Evidence to produce
Data table
Quick glossary
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning — make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure — the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities — you open it through Schoology.
Learn first

Minute-by-minute · 80-minute block

💡 Big idea: Clinical diagnosis is a team sport: synthesizing data from multiple sources and multiple perspectives improves accuracy.

  1. 0-8 minAssign team roles: chart reviewer, vitals analyst, lab analyst, genetics reader.
  2. 8-15 minAgree on SOP: order in which the team reviews each chart section.
  3. 15-40 minIndependent analysis by role; each member flags normal vs. out-of-range values.
  4. 40-58 minBuild shared evidence table; generate ranked differential diagnosis as a group.
  5. 58-70 minSelect most likely candidate; each member drafts their recommendation section.
  6. 70-80 minEach member records one data limitation; team shares aloud before end of period.
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Today you function as a clinical team, each role matters and each person's section feeds the final recommendation.
  • Real diagnostic teams use structured SOPs so nothing gets reviewed out of order or skipped.
  • Your evidence table is the shared document every team member writes to and reads from.
  • The limitation each person identifies is not optional: it shows the team where the diagnosis is still uncertain.
Do this, step by step
  1. 1As a team, define the SOP for reviewing a patient chart in a fixed order.
  2. 2Identify which variables in the chart are normal and which are out of range.
  3. 3Combine history, vitals, bloodwork, and genetics into a shared evidence table.
  4. 4Generate a ranked differential diagnosis and select the most likely candidate.
  5. 5Assign each member a section of the recommendation and note data limitations.
You'll be able to
  • Team produces a ranked differential grounded in the full data set.
  • Each member contributes a documented section and identifies one limitation.
Know by the end
  • A shared evidence table organizes all workup data so the team can compare findings systematically.
  • A ranked differential lists candidates from most to least likely, with data supporting each rank.
  • Each team member owning a section of the recommendation distributes accountability and reduces blind spots.
📺 Tutor me: MedlinePlus: Understanding Medical Tests
Do the work

Your PLTW work today

Open this PLTW section today

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. · Clinical diagnosis team project

Day 3 of this lesson. Open this exact section in myPLTW (reached through Schoology), then do the work below.

Do this: Open myPLTW and find the Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice clinical-diagnosis or patient-data synthesis activity. Use it alongside the patient chart.

Complete

Submit any platform prompts related to differential diagnosis or evidence synthesis.

How far to get

You took workup notes Tuesday. Today your platform work and evidence table should both be substantially complete.

Upload as evidence

Team evidence table (shared doc) plus platform submission confirmation.

All PLTW activities are completed inside the PLTW course environment — this page only gives direction. Submit producibles on Schoology.

The plan

Today's PLTW tracker

Check things off as you work, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible on Schoology.

Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis.Day 3 of this projectSee the full week plan
Today's PLTW target

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. · Clinical diagnosis team project

Open myPLTW and find the Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice clinical-diagnosis or patient-data synthesis activity. Use it alongside the patient chart.

You took workup notes Tuesday. Today your platform work and evidence table should both be substantially complete.

This is how Mr. Mendoza sees the class keeping pace with PLTW. Be honest, it only helps if it is accurate.

1 · What you do today

🎯 Student teams synthesize patient data to propose and justify a working diagnosis.

  • As a team, define the SOP for reviewing a patient chart in a fixed order.
  • Identify which variables in the chart are normal and which are out of range.
  • Combine history, vitals, bloodwork, and genetics into a shared evidence table.
  • Generate a ranked differential diagnosis and select the most likely candidate.
  • Assign each member a section of the recommendation and note data limitations.
2 · Turn in today

Data table: Shared team evidence table with all four workup components, flagged out-of-range values, and a ranked differential diagnosis with the top candidate selected.

Submit on Schoology

Upload by 11:29 PM for full credit.

3 · Who's doing what (team)
TaskWho
As a team, define the SOP for reviewing a patient chart in a fixed order._______
Identify which variables in the chart are normal and which are out of range._______
Combine history, vitals, bloodwork, and genetics into a shared evidence table._______
Generate a ranked differential diagnosis and select the most likely candidate._______
Assign each member a section of the recommendation and note data limitations._______

Working solo? Put your own name in "Who" for every row.

4 · Words I can use correctly
5 · I'm successful today when I can…
  • Team produces a ranked differential grounded in the full data set.
  • Each member contributes a documented section and identifies one limitation.
6 · Reflection & next steps
Where are you today?0/7 checked
Pick your period and code first.
Explore

Resources & readings

Hand-picked materials for this lesson. Class file items open the document directly; the rest are vetted readings and interactives from other biomedical programs.

Words

This unit's vocabulary

differential diagnosisevidence synthesislaboratory testpatient chartrecommendation

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Weekly vocabulary task: add two of these terms to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Check yourself

WebXam practice

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
A patient with suspected bacterial infection has a complete blood count. Which result most supports infection?
A single lab value falls outside the normal range while a patient feels well and prior results were normal. What is the most reliable next step?
When synthesizing several test results into a recommendation, what makes the recommendation most defensible?
Check yourself

Cumulative WebXam review

A quick mixed-review pulling questions from earlier units plus today, so the WebXam material stays fresh.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Clinical Data: reading bloodwork and monitoring chronic disease] A monitoring table shows one glucose value far outside the others in a steady dataset. What is the best first action?
[Review: Decoding a Diagnosis: from DNA to protein] A bacterial transformation produces zero colonies even though the protocol was followed. Which is the most likely cause?
[Review: Genetic Risk: karyotypes, pedigrees, and diagnosing from mixed evidence] A genetic test reports a result without listing its false-positive rate. Why does that limit an evidence-based conclusion?
A patient with suspected bacterial infection has a complete blood count. Which result most supports infection?
Explore

Where this leads — careers

Safety net

What to do if you were absent

Today was a project — do this instead

Group clinical-diagnosis project: teams assemble the new-patient evidence table, rank a differential diagnosis, and draft a shared recommendation for the next session.

MedlinePlus: Lab Tests

Then submit your Data table on Schoology.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

NIH MedlinePlus Lab Tests
Explore

Optional extra credit (async)

You've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home (virtual labs included) for extra credit, all submitted on Schoology.

Open the extra-credit track
How this is graded
For: Data table — Shared team evidence table with all four workup components, flagged out-of-range values, and a ranked differential diagnosis with the top candidate selected.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed.
Submission Zone

Drop your Fri, Oct 30, 2026 · Clinical diagnosis team project here. Use a clear file name (your initials + project). Routine work still goes to Schoology (via the CMSD portal).

Upload a project