Wed, Oct 28, 2026Fall (Semester 1) · Week 10Day 46 of 7580-min block

Diagnostic disclosure debate

Today's target

Students debate how much diagnostic uncertainty a clinician should share with a new patient.

Due today · Exit ticket Required

One-sentence written summary of the most persuasive counterpoint from the disclosure debate.

Your 4 steps today
  1. 1
    Do this
    Students debate how much diagnostic uncertainty a clinician should share with a new patient.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Submit this
    Exit ticket: One-sentence written summary of the most persuasive counterpoint from the disclosure debate.
  4. 4
    Submit it here
    1. 1CMSD website. Go to clevelandmetroschools.org and click the Clever button.
    2. 2Clever. Clever opens. Sign in if it asks.
    3. 3Microsoft (district) login. Use your district Microsoft account (the one for school).
    4. 4Schoology. Open Schoology, then your class, then Assignments, and find the file named below.
    The file to submit is named: Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science) › Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. › Exit ticket
    Open Schoology
Were you absent? Jump to the make-up plan
Where this fits
Tested on (Ohio WebXam)
Principles and Practice of Biomedical Technology · 072110
PLTW lesson
PBS · Diagnostic disclosure debate
WebXam domain
Biotechnology Research and Experiments
Evidence to produce
Exit ticket
Explore

Read to prepare for today

Quick glossary
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning — make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure — the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities — you open it through Schoology.
Learn first

Minute-by-minute · 80-minute block

💡 Big idea: Informed consent is not just a signature: it requires deciding how much uncertainty a patient can and should know.

  1. 0-8 minRead the ambiguous-results case; annotate what you would want to know if you were the patient.
  2. 8-18 minDefine differential diagnosis, informed consent, shared decision-making.
  3. 18-35 minBuild two-point argument for your assigned disclosure position.
  4. 35-60 minStructured debate: full-disclosure vs. staged-disclosure teams, teacher facilitates.
  5. 60-72 minWrite one-sentence summary of the most persuasive counterpoint.
  6. 72-80 minWhole-class debrief; preview Wednesday team project.
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Doctors make hundreds of disclosure decisions every day, and there is no universal rulebook.
  • Today you practice reasoning through those decisions using real vocabulary from clinical medicine.
  • Biotechnology strand of WebXam 072110 expects you to connect lab results to patient communication.
  • The counterpoint you identify at the end is often where the most important clinical thinking lives.
Do this, step by step
  1. 1Read a case where a new patient has ambiguous early test results.
  2. 2Choose a stance on full disclosure versus staged disclosure of uncertainty.
  3. 3List two patient-centered and two clinical reasons supporting your stance.
  4. 4Debate using terms like differential diagnosis, informed consent, and shared decision-making.
  5. 5Summarize the most persuasive counterpoint in one sentence.
You'll be able to
  • Defend a position with patient-centered and clinical evidence.
  • Use diagnostic vocabulary correctly during the debate.
Know by the end
  • Differential diagnosis is an ordered list of possible conditions ranked by likelihood.
  • Shared decision-making balances clinical expertise with the patient's right to understand their own data.
  • Full versus staged disclosure each carry distinct patient-centered and clinical tradeoffs.
📺 Tutor me: MedlinePlus: Talking With Your Doctor
Do the work

Your PLTW work today

Open this PLTW section today

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. · Diagnostic disclosure debate

Day 1 of this lesson. Open this exact section in myPLTW (reached through Schoology), then do the work below.

Do this: Log in to myPLTW and open Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice. Locate the patient communication or bioethics activity for this lesson and complete the opening prompt before the debate.

Complete

Complete all prompts and submit your written response in myPLTW.

How far to get

You finished Lesson 2.2 last week. Today starts Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice, which focuses on the full diagnostic workup of a new patient. Reach and submit the reflection question by end of period.

Upload as evidence

Platform submission confirmation is your evidence for today.

All PLTW activities are completed inside the PLTW course environment — this page only gives direction. Submit producibles on Schoology.

The plan

Today's PLTW tracker

Check things off as you work, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible on Schoology.

Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis.Day 1 of this projectSee the full week plan
Today's PLTW target

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. · Diagnostic disclosure debate

Log in to myPLTW and open Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice. Locate the patient communication or bioethics activity for this lesson and complete the opening prompt before the debate.

You finished Lesson 2.2 last week. Today starts Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice, which focuses on the full diagnostic workup of a new patient. Reach and submit the reflection question by end of period.

This is how Mr. Mendoza sees the class keeping pace with PLTW. Be honest, it only helps if it is accurate.

1 · What you do today

🎯 Students debate how much diagnostic uncertainty a clinician should share with a new patient.

  • Read a case where a new patient has ambiguous early test results.
  • Choose a stance on full disclosure versus staged disclosure of uncertainty.
  • List two patient-centered and two clinical reasons supporting your stance.
  • Debate using terms like differential diagnosis, informed consent, and shared decision-making.
  • Summarize the most persuasive counterpoint in one sentence.
2 · Turn in today

Exit ticket: One-sentence written summary of the most persuasive counterpoint from the disclosure debate.

Submit on Schoology

Upload by 11:29 PM for full credit.

3 · Who's doing what (team)
TaskWho
Read a case where a new patient has ambiguous early test results._______
Choose a stance on full disclosure versus staged disclosure of uncertainty._______
List two patient-centered and two clinical reasons supporting your stance._______
Debate using terms like differential diagnosis, informed consent, and shared decision-making._______
Summarize the most persuasive counterpoint in one sentence._______

Working solo? Put your own name in "Who" for every row.

4 · Words I can use correctly
5 · I'm successful today when I can…
  • Defend a position with patient-centered and clinical evidence.
  • Use diagnostic vocabulary correctly during the debate.
6 · Reflection & next steps
Where are you today?0/7 checked
Pick your period and code first.
Explore

Resources & readings

Hand-picked materials for this lesson. Class file items open the document directly; the rest are vetted readings and interactives from other biomedical programs.

Words

This unit's vocabulary

differential diagnosisevidence synthesislaboratory testpatient chartrecommendation

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Weekly vocabulary task: add two of these terms to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Check yourself

WebXam practice

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
A patient with suspected bacterial infection has a complete blood count. Which result most supports infection?
A single lab value falls outside the normal range while a patient feels well and prior results were normal. What is the most reliable next step?
When synthesizing several test results into a recommendation, what makes the recommendation most defensible?
Check yourself

Cumulative WebXam review

A quick mixed-review pulling questions from earlier units plus today, so the WebXam material stays fresh.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Clinical Data: reading bloodwork and monitoring chronic disease] A monitoring table shows one glucose value far outside the others in a steady dataset. What is the best first action?
[Review: Decoding a Diagnosis: from DNA to protein] A bacterial transformation produces zero colonies even though the protocol was followed. Which is the most likely cause?
[Review: Genetic Risk: karyotypes, pedigrees, and diagnosing from mixed evidence] A genetic test reports a result without listing its false-positive rate. Why does that limit an evidence-based conclusion?
A patient with suspected bacterial infection has a complete blood count. Which result most supports infection?
Explore

Where this leads — careers

Safety net

What to do if you were absent

Today was a debate — do this instead

Team debate: When results are inconclusive, should the clinician disclose every possibility or only confirmed findings? Assign full-disclosure and staged-disclosure teams.

MedlinePlus: Talking With Your Doctor

Then submit your Exit ticket on Schoology.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

NIH MedlinePlus Lab Tests
Explore

Optional extra credit (async)

You've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home (virtual labs included) for extra credit, all submitted on Schoology.

Open the extra-credit track
How this is graded
For: Exit ticket — One-sentence written summary of the most persuasive counterpoint from the disclosure debate.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed.
Submission Zone

Drop your Wed, Oct 28, 2026 · Diagnostic disclosure debate here. Use a clear file name (your initials + project). Routine work still goes to Schoology (via the CMSD portal).

Upload a project