Wed, Nov 4, 2026Fall (Semester 1) · Week 11Day 49 of 7580-min block

Recommendation CER

Today's target

Students write a CER that recommends a diagnosis and next steps from synthesized evidence.

Due today · CER Required

CER with a specific diagnostic claim, multi-source evidence from the workup, reasoning linking each evidence point to the claim, a next-steps recommendation, and one stated limitation.

Your 4 steps today
  1. 1
    Do this
    Students write a CER that recommends a diagnosis and next steps from synthesized evidence.
  2. 2
  3. 3
    Submit this
    CER: CER with a specific diagnostic claim, multi-source evidence from the workup, reasoning linking each evidence point to the claim, a next-steps recommendation, and one stated limitation.
  4. 4
    Submit it here
    1. 1CMSD website. Go to clevelandmetroschools.org and click the Clever button.
    2. 2Clever. Clever opens. Sign in if it asks.
    3. 3Microsoft (district) login. Use your district Microsoft account (the one for school).
    4. 4Schoology. Open Schoology, then your class, then Assignments, and find the file named below.
    The file to submit is named: Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science) › Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. › CER
    Open Schoology
Were you absent? Jump to the make-up plan
Where this fits
Tested on (Ohio WebXam)
Principles and Practice of Biomedical Technology · 072110
PLTW lesson
PBS · Recommendation CER
WebXam domain
Biotechnology Research and Experiments
Evidence to produce
CER
Explore

Read to prepare for today

Quick glossary
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning — make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure — the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities — you open it through Schoology.
Learn first

Minute-by-minute · 80-minute block

💡 Big idea: A diagnostic recommendation is only as strong as the evidence behind it: multi-source support and stated limitations are non-negotiable.

  1. 0-8 minReview Wednesday evidence table; identify the three strongest data points supporting the top diagnosis.
  2. 8-20 minWrite the claim: one sentence naming the most likely diagnosis.
  3. 20-45 minWrite evidence section: cite history, vitals, lab, and genetic data with specific values.
  4. 45-62 minWrite reasoning: connect each evidence point to the diagnostic claim.
  5. 62-72 minAdd next-steps recommendation (confirmatory test or referral) and one limitation.
  6. 72-80 minPeer review: check that claim is specific, evidence is multi-source, limitation is stated.
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Your team built the evidence table yesterday; today you write the individual CER that turns that evidence into a recommendation.
  • Each CER must have a specific diagnosis in the claim, not a general description.
  • Cite at least three data types from the workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, or genetics.
  • The next-steps recommendation is what separates a diagnosis from a plan of care.
Do this, step by step
  1. 1State a claim naming the most likely diagnosis for the patient.
  2. 2Cite specific history, vital, lab, and genetic evidence that support the claim.
  3. 3Explain reasoning that connects each evidence point to the diagnosis.
  4. 4Recommend confirmatory tests or referrals to reduce remaining uncertainty.
  5. 5Name assumptions and limitations that could change the recommendation.
You'll be able to
  • Write a CER with a clear diagnostic claim and multi-source evidence.
  • Recommend appropriate next steps and state at least one limitation.
Know by the end
  • A diagnostic CER claim must name a specific condition, not just a symptom cluster.
  • Multi-source evidence means citing at least history, one lab value, and one other data type.
  • Recommending confirmatory tests is how clinicians reduce uncertainty without guessing.
📺 Tutor me: Khan Academy: Health and Medicine
Do the work

Your PLTW work today

Open this PLTW section today

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. · Recommendation CER

Day 4 of this lesson. Open this exact section in myPLTW (reached through Schoology), then do the work below.

Do this: Open myPLTW and locate any Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice recommendation or CER-writing activity to use as a writing guide.

Complete

Submit any platform prompts for this lesson before starting the independent CER.

How far to get

Platform prompts should be done in the first 15 minutes; the CER is today's main product.

Upload as evidence

Completed CER submitted in Schoology is the primary evidence.

All PLTW activities are completed inside the PLTW course environment — this page only gives direction. Submit producibles on Schoology.

The plan

Today's PLTW tracker

Check things off as you work, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible on Schoology.

Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis.Day 4 of this projectSee the full week plan
Today's PLTW target

Unit 2.3 New to the Practice: New patient diagnostic workup: history, vitals, bloodwork, genetics, evidence synthesis. · Recommendation CER

Open myPLTW and locate any Lesson 2.3 New to the Practice recommendation or CER-writing activity to use as a writing guide.

Platform prompts should be done in the first 15 minutes; the CER is today's main product.

This is how Mr. Mendoza sees the class keeping pace with PLTW. Be honest, it only helps if it is accurate.

1 · What you do today

🎯 Students write a CER that recommends a diagnosis and next steps from synthesized evidence.

  • State a claim naming the most likely diagnosis for the patient.
  • Cite specific history, vital, lab, and genetic evidence that support the claim.
  • Explain reasoning that connects each evidence point to the diagnosis.
  • Recommend confirmatory tests or referrals to reduce remaining uncertainty.
  • Name assumptions and limitations that could change the recommendation.
2 · Turn in today

CER: CER with a specific diagnostic claim, multi-source evidence from the workup, reasoning linking each evidence point to the claim, a next-steps recommendation, and one stated limitation.

Submit on Schoology

Upload by 11:29 PM for full credit.

3 · Who's doing what (team)
TaskWho
State a claim naming the most likely diagnosis for the patient._______
Cite specific history, vital, lab, and genetic evidence that support the claim._______
Explain reasoning that connects each evidence point to the diagnosis._______
Recommend confirmatory tests or referrals to reduce remaining uncertainty._______
Name assumptions and limitations that could change the recommendation._______

Working solo? Put your own name in "Who" for every row.

4 · Words I can use correctly
5 · I'm successful today when I can…
  • Write a CER with a clear diagnostic claim and multi-source evidence.
  • Recommend appropriate next steps and state at least one limitation.
6 · Reflection & next steps
Where are you today?0/7 checked
Pick your period and code first.
Explore

Resources & readings

Hand-picked materials for this lesson. Class file items open the document directly; the rest are vetted readings and interactives from other biomedical programs.

Words

This unit's vocabulary

differential diagnosisevidence synthesislaboratory testpatient chartrecommendation

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Weekly vocabulary task: add two of these terms to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Check yourself

WebXam practice

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
A patient with suspected bacterial infection has a complete blood count. Which result most supports infection?
A single lab value falls outside the normal range while a patient feels well and prior results were normal. What is the most reliable next step?
When synthesizing several test results into a recommendation, what makes the recommendation most defensible?
Check yourself

Cumulative WebXam review

A quick mixed-review pulling questions from earlier units plus today, so the WebXam material stays fresh.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Clinical Data: reading bloodwork and monitoring chronic disease] A monitoring table shows one glucose value far outside the others in a steady dataset. What is the best first action?
[Review: Decoding a Diagnosis: from DNA to protein] A bacterial transformation produces zero colonies even though the protocol was followed. Which is the most likely cause?
[Review: Genetic Risk: karyotypes, pedigrees, and diagnosing from mixed evidence] A genetic test reports a result without listing its false-positive rate. Why does that limit an evidence-based conclusion?
A patient with suspected bacterial infection has a complete blood count. Which result most supports infection?
Explore

Where this leads — careers

Safety net

What to do if you were absent

If YOU are absent

Today is individual PLTW work, so do exactly what we did in class, from home: complete the same PLTW target above, then submit your CER.

Open Schoology (CMSD) and keep going

How to get there: open the CMSD website, click Clever, sign in with your Microsoft (district) account, then open Schoology from Clever.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

NIH MedlinePlus Lab Tests
Explore

Optional extra credit (async)

You've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home (virtual labs included) for extra credit, all submitted on Schoology.

Open the extra-credit track
How this is graded
For: CER — CER with a specific diagnostic claim, multi-source evidence from the workup, reasoning linking each evidence point to the claim, a next-steps recommendation, and one stated limitation.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed.
Submission Zone

Drop your Wed, Nov 4, 2026 · Recommendation CER here. Use a clear file name (your initials + project). Routine work still goes to Schoology (via the CMSD portal).

Upload a project