Claim graph submit
Open your materials, follow the steps, then turn in your work.
Finalize and submit your environmental claim graph with supporting CER analysis.
1. Open your materials
Use the materials named in the first step below. Open lesson resources.
2. Start the work
Combine your data table, graph, and CER paragraph.
Show all 5 required steps
- Combine your data table, graph, and CER paragraph.
- Verify axis labels, units, and outlier notes are correct.
- Add citations for the data source.
- Check that the claim is fully supported by the graph.
- Submit the claim graph and confirm it in your tracker.
Lost your place? Picking back up? Check whether your table, graph, and CER are combined into one piece (step 1). If yes, verify labels and citations (steps 2 to 3). The final move is always: submit and confirm in your tracker (step 5).
Check your work before submitting
- Your submission pairs an accurate graph with a valid CER.
- The claim graph is cited and submitted.
Before lab work: read the safety rules
- Wear the required PPE, keep the bench clear, handle equipment only as directed, and know where the eyewash, sink, and spill kit are before you start.
- Human samples and data stay private: label with a code, never a name, and dispose of materials in the correct waste container, then wash your hands.
3. Turn in your work
DueCheck Schoology- Hand in
- Finalized claim graph package: labeled data table, graph with titled scaled axes, CER paragraph, data-source citations, and outlier notes.
How to submit and name your file
Use the submission route shown on today's today's page.
In Schoology, open your course and the assignment for this lesson. Attach your file, select Submit, and check that it appears in the submission.
PDF upload helpYou get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.
How this lesson connects
Keep using what you learned last class: A CER paragraph converts a graph into an argument because it forces you to name the exact number and the exact reasoning, so a reader can check your logic instead of trusting your impression. Today: A submission counts only when every point is traceable and the claim stays inside the graph, so that a stranger can verify your argument and the tracker confirmation makes it officially exist.
Optional: listen or watch a unit review▸
Need help? Warm-up, timing, and directions▸
💡 Big idea: A submission counts only when every point is traceable and the claim stays inside the graph, so that a stranger can verify your argument and the tracker confirmation makes it officially exist.
- 0-5 minWarm-up: what is the one thing still wrong or missing in your graph?
- 5-20 minCombine , graph, and CER into one document
- 20-40 minVerify axis labels, units, and outlier notes; add data-source citations
- 40-55 minConfirm the claim is fully supported by graph values
- 55-68 minFinal partner check: can they identify the claim and its evidence?
- 68-80 minSubmit claim graph and confirm in tracker
- • Today we close out the graphing unit with a polished, submission-ready package.
- • We're combining the , the graph, and the CER paragraph into one complete artifact.
- • Every number needs a citation. Every axis needs a label. Every claim needs the graph to back it.
- • When you submit today, Problem 4 graphing is done.
- • Every data point in a submission needs a traceable source citation.
- • The claim and the graph must align: a claim that goes beyond the data is unsupported.
- • Tracker confirmation is the last step that makes the submission count.
PLTW connection and today's work
Open Problem 4 in your myPLTW course shell and confirm Problem 4 graphing activities are complete, then finalize and submit your environmental claim graph.
Today's stopping point: Graphing should be fully wrapped up today; no Problem 4 graphing items should remain open after this submission.
PLTW activity titles identify the course connection. If your account will not open, use the posted materials for today and tell Mr. Mendoza. Do not mark an online activity complete unless you completed it.
Course connection
- Project 4.1.4 Dose Response
Use the turn-in directions at the top of this page. Do not create a second submission unless your teacher asks for one.
Show another explanation or a smaller first step
Need help? Choose a starting point
Finish the assigned lab safely before starting extra practice.
Lesson resources: reading, slides, and vocabulary▸
The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.
Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.
A CER paragraph converts a graph into an argument because it forces you to name the exact number and the exact reasoning, so a reader can check your logic instead of trusting your impression.
A submission counts only when every point is traceable and the claim stays inside the graph, so that a stranger can verify your argument and the tracker confirmation makes it officially exist.
An engineering team tests one prototype feature at a time against a written criterion and records each failure before revising.
- Which criterion is being tested?
- What stays controlled between trials?
- Which result justifies a specific revision?
A useful prototype test links a controlled trial to a measurable criterion and turns the result into a documented revision decision.
A classroom test can reveal a design weakness without establishing clinical , effectiveness, durability, or regulatory readiness.
- • The written criterion maps to the pass condition.
- • Repeated controlled trials map to test evidence.
- • The revision log maps to the next design change and its rationale.
Driving question: You are about to submit your claim graph. Does every number trace back to a source, and does your written claim stay inside what the graph can actually prove?
What you already know: A CER paragraph converts a graph into an argument because it forces you to name the exact number and the exact reasoning, so a reader can check your logic instead of trusting your impression.
New idea: A submission counts only when every point is traceable and the claim stays inside the graph, so that a stranger can verify your argument and the tracker confirmation makes it officially exist.
Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Claim graph submit. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Trace the labeled system, test, or design relationship and identify which evidence should trigger revision.
- Observe or measure the relevant feature in claim graph submit.
- Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
- Apply this rule: A useful prototype test links a controlled trial to a measurable criterion and turns the result into a documented revision decision.
- Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.
Real biomedical example: You are about to submit your claim graph. Does every number trace back to a source, and does your written claim stay inside what the graph can actually prove?
What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.
What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.
Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.
Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.
A planned study connects its question to defined variables, controls, sampling, measurement, and analysis so the resulting data can support a bounded and reproducible conclusion.
Limit: A statistical difference or trend does not automatically establish practical importance, causation, generalizability, or freedom from bias.
A useful prototype test links a controlled trial to a measurable criterion and turns the result into a documented revision decision.
Limit: A classroom test can reveal a design weakness without establishing clinical , effectiveness, durability, or regulatory readiness.
Your submission pairs an accurate graph with a valid CER.
Limit: E3 defines the classroom product or success criterion. It is not independent scientific evidence and cannot justify a clinical or causal claim.
PLTW-BFH-2027-04-16 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario
Your role: biomedical design team member
Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from claim graph submit supports before submitting the lab report named on today's page.
- • Send it in now, since the graph looks polished and the CER is written; citations are just extra paperwork.
- • Wait for an outside reader to follow one citation, since nobody has checked whether it lands on the number you plotted.
- • Submit once every data point traces to a source and the written claim says nothing the graph cannot show.
Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the lab report.
Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about claim graph submit. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.
Reason for review: Your team must decide what the evidence from claim graph submit supports before submitting the lab report named on today's page.
Context: A claim is only as strong as it is traceable: every data point needs a source, and the claim can never say more than the graph actually shows, or the whole argument collapses under one question.
- • T1: Combine your , graph, and CER paragraph.
- • T2: Verify axis labels, units, and outlier notes are correct.
- • T3: Add citations for the data source.
- • T4: Check that the claim is fully supported by the graph.
- • T5: Submit the claim graph and confirm it in your tracker.
- • E1: A planned study connects its question to defined variables, controls, sampling, measurement, and analysis so the resulting data can support a bounded and reproducible conclusion.
- • E2: A useful prototype test links a controlled trial to a measurable criterion and turns the result into a documented revision decision.
- • E3: Your submission pairs an accurate graph with a valid CER.
Measurements: Use only the measurements, units, graph, or counts supplied in today's task. No additional patient measurement is implied.
Figure finding: Teaching diagram for Claim graph submit. Trace the labeled system, test, or design relationship and identify which evidence should trigger revision. This is a teaching model, not patient or experimental data.
Uncertainty: This is a composite classroom scenario. Missing history, measurements, or confirmation tests remain unknown and limit the conclusion.
Mean = sum of values / number of values. Median = middle ordered value. Range = maximum - minimum.
For 2, 4, 4, and 10: mean = 20 / 4 = 5, median = 4, and range = 10 - 2 = 8.
Mean, median, and range keep the measurement unit. Order the values before finding the median.
Calculate the requested summary for today's supplied values, then write what it reveals and what it hides.
Students often think Once the graph looks polished and the CER is written, the work is done and I can submit; citations and the tracker are just extra paperwork.. The trap: Polish is not proof. An uncited data point is unverifiable, so a reader cannot trust it, and an unconfirmed tracker entry means the submission does not exist in the system. Both are load-bearing, not paperwork.
Final package contents:
1. Data table: monthly PM2.5 with units (micrograms/m3), June flagged as an outlier.
2. Graph: line graph titled 'Monthly Roadway PM2.5', y-axis scaled 0 to 40 with units, x-axis months.
3. CER paragraph: claims summer PM2.5 is highest, cites the 35 vs 9 to 14 values, classifies the link as correlation, and names the wildfire alternative explanation.
4. Citation: city air-quality monitoring data (agency report), accessed this term.
Alignment check: My claim says 'highest in summer in this dataset,' which the graph fully supports. I did not claim summer causes the spike, because the data only shows correlation, so the claim stays within the evidence.
Tracker: marked the claim graph as submitted.
This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the Problem 4 claim-graph deliverable: a labeled data table, a graph with titled scaled axes, a CER paragraph, data-source citations, and outlier notes.
- State the question and method.
- Present the observations and data with units.
- Explain the result, limitations, and next investigation.
Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.
Also due today: Submit the finalized claim graph on Schoology and confirm in your tracker.
- CER:
- Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
- SOP:
- Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
- Tracker:
- Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
- myPLTW:
- The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
Classroom documents for this lesson are posted in Schoology. Open Clever, then Schoology, and find each one by the name shown on its card.
Open this when the class reaches this activity and use it to complete the required lesson artifact.
Placement rationale
Matched Environmental data graphing and analysis by path:Biomedical-Innovations/Problem-4_Environmental-Health/4.1_Environmental-Health; keywords:environmental. Score 134. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).
Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.
Placement rationale
Matched Environmental data graphing and analysis by path:Biomedical-Innovations/Problem-4_Environmental-Health/4.1_Environmental-Health; keywords:environmental. Score 130. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).
Use this if you were absent, got stuck, or need another pass before you submit the lesson artifact.
Placement rationale
Matched Environmental data graphing and analysis by path:Biomedical-Innovations/Problem-4_Environmental-Health/4.1_Environmental-Health; keywords:environmental. Score 130. Visibility: student-schoology (student-facing resource; link through Schoology rather than local path).
Sign in to Clever with your district Microsoft account to open Schoology or myPLTW. Follow today's posted steps. If myPLTW will not open, use the posted alternative and tell Mr. Mendoza. Turn in your completed work through the Schoology assignment.
Practice: try a question, then check your answer▸
Claim ceiling for this check: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about claim graph submit. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.
Your graph shows nitrate levels at 3 sample sites. Your claim reads: 'Nitrate pollution is rising across all of Cleveland's water.' Is this ready to submit? Fix it.
Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.
Missed class or ready for more?▸
Run this before you touch the bench. It is built from the real lab procedure, so the decisions you make here are the ones you will make with the equipment in your hands. This lesson has more than one, and they cover different skills.
I can name the procedure's purpose and the evidence I will record. I can state today's specific hazards and the control for each. If this deck does not name them, I ask Mr. Mendoza before I touch anything. My data table is ready before materials are handled.
Finish the checklist before you handle any material.
- • Wear the required PPE, keep the bench clear, handle equipment only as directed, and know where the eyewash, sink, and spill kit are before you start.
- • Human samples and data stay private: label with a code, never a name, and dispose of materials in the correct waste container, then wash your hands.
- 1Before materials are handled, identify the purpose, variables or comparison, controls, measurement units, and stop-work condition.
- 2Combine your data table, graph, and CER paragraph.
- 3Verify axis labels, units, and outlier notes are correct.
- 4Add citations for the data source.
- 5Check that the claim is fully supported by the graph.
- 6Submit the claim graph and confirm it in your tracker.
- 7Record each result in the prepared table before interpreting it. Mark missing, repeated, or invalid results truthfully.
- 8Complete the named cleanup and waste route, remove PPE safely, wash hands when required, and confirm the station is ready for the next group.
| Trial or sample ID | Independent condition | Measured result with units | Observation before interpretation | Quality-control note |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Before the procedure, predict the result and cite the rule behind the prediction.
After the procedure, compare the result with the prediction and name one limitation or source of uncertainty.
What today's skills lead to. These are real health-science careers this course builds toward. Tap one to see, on the US Department of Labor's O*NET site, what the job actually involves, what it pays, and how fast it is growing.
Today is individual work you can do from home: complete the same target above, then submit your Lab report.
Go to Schoology to turn this in. Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf. If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:
Khan Academy StatisticsYou've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home, including virtual labs, for extra credit. Each item shows its correct submission route.
Open the extra-credit track- CompleteEvery required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
- AccurateThe science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
- Scientific reasoningYou explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
- Professional communicationClear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
- SubmittedGo to Schoology to turn this in. Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf. If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
- Error analysis and method · counts doubleName a specific limit of the method and how it moved your result, and compare what you predicted to what happened. "Human error" does not count; say what about the procedure or instrument caused it.
This week
My Progress dashboard