ClinVar: which IRF6 changes cause disease?
Lots of people carry small differences in IRF6 and are fine. How do scientists decide which IRF6 changes actually cause a , like Mateo's, and which do not matter?
Not every matters. ClinVar collects reported variants and labels each one, pathogenic, benign, or uncertain, so doctors and families can tell signal from noise.
Prerequisite check
- predicts a 's 3D structure and colors each part by confidence (pLDDT), dark blue is very high, orange is low.
- A domain is a distinct functional part of a ; IRF6 has a near its front (N-terminal) end.
What to learn
Goal: Search IRF6 in ClinVar, filter for pathogenic versus uncertain variants, read one variant record, and build a small table of three variants with their clinical significance.
- ClinVar is a public archive of reported genetic variants and what they mean for health.
- A is classified as disease-causing; a has an unknown effect.
- Each ClinVar record lists the variant, the gene, the condition, and the clinical significance.
- Filtering by clinical significance separates the IRF6 changes that cause clefting from the ones that probably do not.
Guided notes
Search and filter
- Search IRF6 in ClinVar and write how many variants are reported (a rough count is fine).
- Use the Clinical significance filter to show only Pathogenic, then only Uncertain significance.
Read one record
- Open one pathogenic IRF6 variant and write the variant name, the condition it is linked to, and its clinical significance.
- Note whether the record lists a review status (how many sources support it).
Build the table
- Make a small table with three IRF6 variants: variant name, condition, and clinical significance.
- Include at least one pathogenic and one uncertain (VUS) so the contrast is clear.
Reading the Research
- Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
- Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
- Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
- Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Use the real database
clinvar
- Open ClinVar at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/?term=IRF6%5Bgene%5D (this searches the gene IRF6). If you start from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ instead, type IRF6[gene] into the search box and press Search.
- Look at the result count at the top and note roughly how many IRF6 variants are reported.
- In the Filters panel on the left, open classification (clinical significance) and check Pathogenic to show only disease-causing variants.
- Pick one from the list and click its name to open the full record.
- On the record page, write down the variant name, the Gene (IRF6), the Condition(s) it is linked to (for example ), and the classification (Pathogenic).
- Note the Review status (the star rating, showing how many sources agree), then click your browser Back button to return to the list.
- Go back to the Filters and switch the classification to Uncertain significance to find a VUS, and record one of those variants for your table.
Using the database (what to capture)
Lists DNA variants that have been reported, the condition each is linked to, and a clinical-significance call.
- 1Open ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar and search IRF6[gene].
- 2Open one variant from the list (for example R84C).
- 3Read its clinical significance and the review status (how many labs agree).
- Variant name: R84C (or c.250C>T)
- Condition: Popliteal pterygium syndrome
- Clinical significance: Pathogenic
- VUS vs pathogenic call: Pathogenic, not a VUS, because it recurs in many affected families
The full reference record for a gene: its official symbol, ID, location, and what it does.
- 1Go to ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene and type the gene symbol IRF6 in the search box, then press Search.
- 2Open the top result whose organism is Homo sapiens (human).
- 3At the top of the record, read three things and write them down: the official symbol, the Gene ID number, and the location ( band).
- Symbol (official gene name): IRF6
- Gene ID (the stable number): 3664
- Location (chromosome band): 1q32.2
- Summary (one line on its job): A transcription factor needed for the skin-surface cells that let the lip and palate fuse.
Pick your level
Use the sentence starters, a word bank from the vocabulary, a labeled diagram, and the exact source link.
Complete a partly blank model or table and explain it.
Make a claim from a new example or an unfamiliar entry in ClinVar.
Work as a research team
- Manager: keeps the group moving
- Recorder: writes the shared model or table
- Evidence checker: verifies each claim against the source
- Reporter: explains the group's reasoning
- What evidence changed your thinking today?
- What did your group disagree about, and how did you resolve it?
- What question is still unresolved?
Demonstration of learning
By the end of this session, submit ONE of: a labeled diagram with a 2-sentence explanation; a claim, evidence, reasoning paragraph; a completed data table from a real database; or a one-question exit ticket using today's vocabulary.
Recommended here: A small table of three IRF6 variants, each row giving the variant name, the linked condition, and the clinical significance, with at least one Pathogenic and one Uncertain significance (VUS) so the contrast is clear.
| Criterion | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Every required part of the artifact is present and filled in. | Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank. | Several parts are missing. |
| Accurate | The science and data are correct and match the evidence. | Mostly correct, with a small factual slip. | Key science or data is wrong. |
| Scientific reasoning (CER) | States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning. | Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing. | Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning. |
| Professional communication | Clear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it. | Readable but disorganized or missing labels. | Hard to follow. |
| Submitted | Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed. | Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed. | Not turned in. |
- CompleteProficient: Nothing is left blank: the model fills every part of "A small table of three IRF6 variants, each row giving the variant name, the linked condition, and the clinical significance, with at least one Pathogenic and one Uncertain significance (VUS) so the contrast is clear.".
- AccurateProficient: Every number and claim matches the case evidence.
- Scientific reasoning (CER)Proficient: It names a claim, cites the specific evidence, and explains the reasoning, not just the answer.
- Professional communicationProficient: It is organized and labeled like a real chart note.
- SubmittedProficient: It would be turned in on Schoology and confirmed.
