What are the main parts, stages, or choices in this model?
Use the labels and the picture's left-to-right, near-to-far, or before-and-after order. Name only what you can point to.
Why it matters: Protein-shape models help researchers choose which region to test, mutate, or target. Treating a prediction as proof can waste experiments or misstate what a variant does.
You can connect a protein region's shape to its job without claiming more than the model shows.
Turn the amount up and down; the result tells you if the signal decides or just allows.
A multi-tool has separate parts shaped for cutting, gripping, and turning. Shape can suggest a part's job, but a picture cannot prove the tool completed a task.
Do not jump to the biology yet. Treat the picture as a small system. Track its parts, follow one change at a time, and keep more than one explanation open until the picture supplies a way to separate them.
What are the main parts, stages, or choices in this model?
Use the labels and the picture's left-to-right, near-to-far, or before-and-after order. Name only what you can point to.
What changes while the other parts stay the same?
Follow one object, stage, or path. Point to the first place where the situation changes instead of jumping to the ending.
What check would separate two explanations that still fit the picture?
List more than one explanation that still fits. Name the extra observation that would help you separate those possibilities.

Work from the visible evidence. A useful answer names the part of the picture that supports it and leaves unknown causes open.
Use the multi-tool to connect one part's shape to a possible job without claiming more than the picture shows.
Answer in plain words. You can finish this required check without opening either optional section below.
How can a tool's shape show which job each part is built to do?
Boss or doorman? A working shape may allow a job without deciding the whole outcome. Shape shows what is possible, not what happened in one child.

Goal: Inspect a three-dimensional model, identify one working region, and explain how its shape supports a specific job without overclaiming.
alphafold
Shows a predicted 3D shape of a , colored by how confident the prediction is.
The reference record for a : its length, its domains, and what each part does.
The full reference record for a gene: its official symbol, ID, location, and what it does.
Use the sentence starters, a word bank from the vocabulary, a labeled diagram, and the exact source link.
Complete a partly blank model or table and explain it.
Make a claim from a new example or an unfamiliar entry in .
By the end of this session, submit ONE of: a labeled diagram with a 2-sentence explanation; a claim, evidence, reasoning paragraph; a completed data table from a real database; or a one-question exit ticket using today's vocabulary.
Recommended here: An annotated note: a one-sentence description of IRF6's overall shape, the name and amino acid range of the DNA-binding domain (from UniProt), a note on its AlphaFold confidence color, and one sentence linking the domain's shape to IRF6's job as a transcription factor.
| Criterion | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Every required part of the artifact is present and filled in. | Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank. | Several parts are missing. |
| Accurate | The science and data are correct and match the evidence. | Mostly correct, with a small factual slip. | Key science or data is wrong. |
| Scientific reasoning (CER) | States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning. | Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing. | Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning. |
| Professional communication | Clear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it. | Readable but disorganized or missing labels. | Hard to follow. |
| Submitted | Turned in through the route named under Submit here and confirmed. | Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed. | Not turned in. |
Everything required is above. Open this section only if you want the research reading and source trail.
How can a tool's shape show which job each part is built to do?
A multi-tool has separate parts shaped for cutting, gripping, and turning. Shape can suggest a part's job, but a picture cannot prove the tool completed a task.
Boss or doorman? A working shape may allow a job without deciding the whole outcome. Shape shows what is possible, not what happened in one child.
This lesson reading is written from the vetted sources in the advanced citation trail below.
Everything you need for today is on this page. These links are optional.
These records and papers document the science. They are not assigned student reading. Use the plain-language lesson reading above unless your teacher asks you to inspect an original source.