CRISPR-Cas9: programmable molecular scissors
We know the gene change behind Mateo's . If we could rewrite one short stretch of DNA, what tool would let us find that exact spot and change it?
is programmable: a short guide RNA is written to match a chosen DNA site, the Cas9 cuts there, and the cell's repair can be steered to change the sequence back toward the healthy version.
Prerequisite check
- ClinVar is a public archive of reported genetic variants and what they mean for health.
- A is classified as disease-causing; a has an unknown effect.
What to learn
Goal: Explain how a guide RNA targets a DNA site, how Cas9 cuts, and how a cut can lead to gene correction.
- A guide RNA is a short RNA written to match a chosen target by base pairing.
- Cas9 is the that does the cutting; the guide RNA steers it to the right spot.
- Cas9 makes a cut in the DNA, and the cell then repairs that cut.
- If a healthy template is supplied during repair, the cell can copy it and the sequence is changed back toward the healthy version (gene correction).
- is programmable: change the guide RNA and you change the target, without changing the Cas9 .
Guided notes
The three parts
- Label a simple diagram with the three parts: the target DNA, the guide RNA, and the Cas9 .
- In one sentence each, write the job of the guide RNA and the job of Cas9.
Find, cut, repair
- Put these steps in order: Cas9 cuts the DNA, the guide RNA binds the matching site, the cell repairs the cut.
- Explain why we say is programmable, using the words guide RNA and target.
From a cut to a correction
- A cut by itself is not a fix. Explain what has to be supplied so the cell repairs toward the healthy sequence.
- Connect this to Mateo: which gene change from Phase 3 would a correction aim to repair?
Reading the Research
- Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
- Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
- Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
- Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Using the database (what to capture)
Plain-language explanations of a gene or condition, written for patients and families.
- 1Open medlineplus.gov/genetics and search the gene or condition (IRF6).
- 2Read the summary written in everyday words.
- 3Note the conditions the gene is linked to at the bottom of the page.
- Topic: IRF6 gene
- Plain-language summary: IRF6 helps the tissues of the face join correctly before birth.
- Linked conditions: Van der Woude syndrome; nonsyndromic cleft
Pick your level
Use the sentence starters, a word bank from the vocabulary, a labeled diagram, and the exact source link.
Complete a partly blank model or table and explain it.
Make a claim from a new example or an unfamiliar entry in the same database.
Work as a research team
- Manager: keeps the group moving
- Recorder: writes the shared model or table
- Evidence checker: verifies each claim against the source
- Reporter: explains the group's reasoning
- What evidence changed your thinking today?
- What did your group disagree about, and how did you resolve it?
- What question is still unresolved?
Demonstration of learning
By the end of this session, submit ONE of: a labeled diagram with a 2-sentence explanation; a claim, evidence, reasoning paragraph; a completed data table from a real database; or a one-question exit ticket using today's vocabulary.
| Criterion | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Every required part of the artifact is present and filled in. | Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank. | Several parts are missing. |
| Accurate | The science and data are correct and match the evidence. | Mostly correct, with a small factual slip. | Key science or data is wrong. |
| Scientific reasoning (CER) | States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning. | Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing. | Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning. |
| Professional communication | Clear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it. | Readable but disorganized or missing labels. | Hard to follow. |
| Submitted | Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed. | Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed. | Not turned in. |
- CompleteProficient: Nothing is left blank: the model fills every part of "Explain how a guide RNA targets a DNA site, how Cas9 cuts, and how a cut can lead to gene correction.".
- AccurateProficient: Every number and claim matches the case evidence.
- Scientific reasoning (CER)Proficient: It names a claim, cites the specific evidence, and explains the reasoning, not just the answer.
- Professional communicationProficient: It is organized and labeled like a real chart note.
- SubmittedProficient: It would be turned in on Schoology and confirmed.
