Variables and controls

Open your materials, follow the steps, then turn in your work.

Define independent, dependent, and controlled variables using teacher notes and the PLTW online task.

1. Open your materials

Use the materials named in the first step below. Open lesson resources.

2. Start the work

Take notes on variable types and experimental controls.

Show all 5 required steps
  1. Take notes on variable types and experimental controls.
  2. Define sample size and explain why it matters.
  3. Complete the PLTW online variables-identification activity.
  4. Label variables in a sample experiment description.
  5. Write one example of a confounding variable.

Lost your place? Lost your place? Check your notes for the three variable definitions, confirm you wrote why sample size matters, then finish the PLTW online activity and label the variables in the sample experiment.

Check your work before submitting

  • All three variable types are correctly identified in the sample.
  • PLTW online task is submitted complete.

3. Turn in your work

DueCheck Schoology
Hand in
Labeled sample experiment with independent, dependent, and controlled variables identified, plus a written confounding-variable example.
How to submit and name your file

Use the submission route shown on today's today's page.

In Schoology, open your course and the assignment for this lesson. Attach your file, select Submit, and check that it appears in the submission.

PDF upload help

You get two school days for every day you were absent, so this deadline moves with you.

Choose your Schoology section. Open only one assignment.

Check the section number beside Human Anatomy and Physiology in Schoology.

Assignment: Wk12 Lab notebook: Variables and controls

Link will not open? Open Schoology, choose your section, and find the assignment title above.

How this lesson connects

Keep using what you learned last class: Scientists use model organisms because they share conserved biology with humans, so their use always carries an ethical cost that must be weighed against the knowledge gained. Today: A controlled experiment changes one variable and holds the rest constant, so that any change in the result can be attributed to that single cause.

Unit 2 guide: what to keep and use next
Optional: listen or watch a unit review
Optional unit study notebook
Variables, controls, and the research model behind a sound scientific investigation.
Open the notebook
Optional review video
Audio overviewVideo overviewMind mapStudy guideFlashcardsQuizData table
Need help? Warm-up, timing, and directions

💡 Big idea: A controlled experiment changes one variable and holds the rest constant, so that any change in the result can be attributed to that single cause.

  1. 0-10Warm-up: identify what is wrong with a poorly designed experiment (projected example)
  2. 10-28Guided notes: independent, dependent, controlled variables, , confounding variables
  3. 28-45PLTW online variables-identification activity
  4. 45-60Label variables in a provided sample experiment description
  5. 60-72Write one confounding variable scenario and share with a partner
  6. 72-80Submit labeled experiment and PLTW activity confirmation
Mr. Mendoza's 5-minute intro
  • Every valid scientific experiment is built on the same logical structure: change one thing, measure one thing, control everything else.
  • Today you will master that structure using real and sample experiment descriptions.
  • Understanding variables is foundational for designing your own C. elegans investigation later this week.
  • The PLTW online activity will let you practice identifying variables in multiple scenarios.
Know by the end
  • The is deliberately changed; the is measured; controlled variables are held constant.
  • affects the reliability and generalizability of experimental results.
  • Confounding variables introduce alternative explanations and weaken causal conclusions.

PLTW connection and today's work

Complete the variables-identification online activity in Problem 2.3.1 Toxic Relationships in myPLTW; work through all independent, dependent, and controlled variable scenarios during the 28-45 minute window.

Today's stopping point: Monday's task is done; today the variables task should show complete in your progress bar.

PLTW activity titles identify the course connection. If your account will not open, use the posted materials for today and tell Mr. Mendoza. Do not mark an online activity complete unless you completed it.

Course connection

  • Problem 2.3.1 Toxic Relationships

Use the turn-in directions at the top of this page. Do not create a second submission unless your teacher asks for one.

Show another explanation or a smaller first step

Need help? Choose a starting point

Need a running start
Anchor it in one sentence: "I changed the sugar, I measured the lifespan, I kept the temperature the same." Match each part to its label (independent, dependent, controlled) and the rest follows.
On track
Take the sample experiment and name all three variable types, then invent one confounding variable that would give a false result, because spotting the confounder is the real skill here.
Stuck? Get unstuck
Rewatch or reread the variables notes, then do the PLTW online activity slowly, checking each answer against the definition before moving on.
Push me further
Explain how a large sample size protects against a confounding variable you did not even know was present, using the idea of averaging out random noise.
Lesson resources: reading, slides, and vocabulary
Socratic teaching slide deck

The deck carries the prior idea forward, lets you inspect an analogy, maps the rule to biology, and ends with the same evidence decision and exit ticket used on this page.

Generated from this lesson's canonical data with a red-team citation check.

Carry forward

Scientists use model organisms because they share conserved biology with humans, so their use always carries an ethical cost that must be weighed against the knowledge gained.

Daily take-home

A controlled experiment changes one variable and holds the rest constant, so that any change in the result can be attributed to that single cause.

Inspect the analogy

A research team lays out its question, variables, controls, sampling plan, measurement record, and analysis before deciding what the data support.

  1. Which variable is changed or compared?
  2. Which conditions and measurements must stay consistent?
  3. Which conclusion is inside the study's evidence boundary?
Rule

Define variables, controls, sampling, units, and the analysis plan before interpreting a result; analysis cannot repair biased or inconsistent measurement.

Where it breaks

A well-organized classroom study can still be limited by , measurement quality, confounding, and the population represented.

Map the analogy to biology
  • Question and variable cards map to the study design.
  • Control and measurement cards map to fair, reproducible data collection.
  • The conclusion card maps to a bounded claim supported by the analysis.
Read this first

Driving question: If worms fed a high-sugar diet live shorter lives, how do we know it was the sugar and not the temperature, the crowding, or the batch of worms?

What you already know: Scientists use model organisms because they share conserved biology with humans, so their use always carries an ethical cost that must be weighed against the knowledge gained.

New idea: A controlled experiment changes one variable and holds the rest constant, so that any change in the result can be attributed to that single cause.

Visual or model: F1. F1. A lesson illustration or teaching diagram for Variables and controls. Use it with E1-E3; it is a model or context image, not experimental or patient data. What to notice: Trace the labeled structure, movement, or system relationship that connects form to function.

  1. Observe or measure the relevant feature in today's lesson.
  2. Organize the observation with a stable evidence ID.
  3. Apply this rule: Define variables, controls, sampling, units, and the analysis plan before interpreting a result; analysis cannot repair biased or inconsistent measurement.
  4. Choose the option the evidence supports and state the limit of the conclusion.

Real biomedical example: If worms fed a high-sugar diet live shorter lives, how do we know it was the sugar and not the temperature, the crowding, or the batch of worms?

What the evidence supports: E1-E3 and F1 support the daily take-home when the response meets the stated success criteria.

What it cannot prove: The package does not support claims beyond this lesson's or any real patient diagnosis.

Vocabulary:
  • : A species, such as zebrafish or mouse, studied because its biology is similar enough to ours to teach us about human development and disease.
  • C. elegans: Use the lesson context and glossary entry to explain C. elegans in your own words.
  • : A that measures the presence, amount, or activity of a target substance such as a , , or chemical in a sample.
  • literature: The body of published research articles and reports on a topic that scientists read to learn what is already known before doing new work.
  • variable: Any factor in an experiment that can change or be changed, including what you test, what you measure, and what you hold steady.
  • control: The comparison condition that isolates the effect of the variable being tested by keeping everything else the same.
  • : The number of subjects or observations in a study; larger samples give more reliable results and reduce the role of chance.

Use it now: Choose one decision option. Cite E1 and E3, then explain how the rule connects the evidence to your choice.

Go further, optional: The source links below are optional enrichment. Every fact required for today's local evidence decision appears in this lesson package.

Evidence set and decision
E1 · Source fact

A planned study connects its question to defined variables, controls, sampling, measurement, and analysis so the resulting data can support a bounded and reproducible conclusion.

Limit: A statistical difference or trend does not automatically establish practical importance, causation, generalizability, or freedom from bias.

E2 · Teaching model

Define variables, controls, sampling, units, and the analysis plan before interpreting a result; analysis cannot repair biased or inconsistent measurement.

Limit: A well-organized classroom study can still be limited by , measurement quality, confounding, and the population represented.

E3 · Task criterion

All three variable types are correctly identified in the sample.

Limit: E3 defines the classroom product or success criterion. It is not independent scientific evidence and cannot justify a clinical or causal claim.

PLTW-HAP-2027-04-07 · Simulated classroom evidence scenario

Your role: anatomy and physiology consultant

Decision: Your team must decide what the evidence from today's lesson supports before submitting the notebook record named on today's page.

  • Label diet as the and lifespan as the dependent one, holding temperature and crowding steady.
  • Call the sugar diet the , since it is the condition you control in the setup.
  • Ask how lifespan was counted and how many worms each group had, since those numbers are never stated.

Response: State one choice, cite at least two evidence IDs, explain the rule that connects them, and add one limitation. Submit it as the notebook record.

Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about today's lesson. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Design record
Criteria
  • The solution must address the stated need in today's lesson.
  • The decision must be supported by E1-E3.
  • The final product must make the success criteria visible.
Constraints
  • Complete the work inside the 80-minute block.
  • Use only supplied or teacher-approved materials and evidence.
  • Do not trade , accessibility, or privacy for speed.
Tradeoff weights
  • and evidence quality: must pass before scoring other criteria.
  • User need and effectiveness: highest scored criterion.
  • Time, cost, and ease of use: compare only after and effectiveness pass.

Test evidence: For each option, record the E1-E3 result that supports or fails each criterion. Do not assign a score without a named observation.

Iteration log
  1. Version or option tested
  2. Criterion met or missed
  3. Evidence ID and result
  4. Revision made
  5. Reason for the revision
Decision record
  1. Need and user
  2. Criteria and constraints
  3. Chosen option and evidence
  4. Test result
  5. Revision and reason
Watch the trap

Students often think Students often think the is "the thing you control" and mix it up with the .. The trap: Flip it and your whole experiment reads backward. The is what you change on purpose; the is what you measure in response. A quick fix: the dependent variable depends on what you did to the independent one.

Worked example · a parallel case (guides, does not reveal)
Labeled experiment with variables
Completes: A sample experiment with the independent, dependent, and controlled variables correctly identified, plus a written example of a confounding variable.

Sample experiment: Testing whether a low dose of copper in the water changes how fast C. elegans worms move.

  • Independent variable (what I change): the amount of copper added to the water (0, low, medium).
  • Dependent variable (what I measure): the worms' movement speed (body bends per minute).
  • Controlled variables (held constant): temperature, food amount, age of the worms, dish size, observation time.

Confounding variable example: if the copper dishes were also kept warmer than the control dishes, then temperature would be confounded with copper, and I could not tell whether slower movement came from the copper or the heat.

Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: A sample experiment with the independent, dependent, and controlled variables correctly identified, plus a written example of a confounding variable.

Build yours step by step
  1. Date and label the entry.
  2. Record the procedure, observation, or design decision clearly.
  3. End with what the evidence means and the next step.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Submit your labeled experiment on Schoology.

See the full worked example
Portal terms
CER:
Claim, Evidence, Reasoning: make a claim, back it with evidence, explain your reasoning.
SOP:
Standard Operating Procedure, the exact steps to follow (especially in a lab).
Tracker:
Your PLTW progress log where you record completed evidence.
myPLTW:
The PLTW course site where you do the online activities. Find it in Clever with your Microsoft sign-in, right next to Schoology.
This unit's vocabulary
C. elegans

Tap the speaker to hear a term. Add two of these to your notebook glossary with a definition and an example in your own words.

Build your vocabulary · optional, for extra credit

Pick just 2 or 3 words from today and make them yours: write what each one means in your own words, name the context clue or evidence that helped, then give one example from what you actually did in Variables and controls. Try your own words first; the glossary is there if you get stuck. This is voluntary and counts as extra credit, so keep it short.

model organism
C. elegans
assay
literature
variable
control

Saved on this device. Show Mr. Mendoza or add these to your notebook glossary to claim the extra credit.

Resources & readings

Hand-picked readings, videos, and interactives for this lesson, all free and from authoritative open organizations (NIH, CDC, OpenStax, Khan Academy, PhET, HHMI, and more).

Unit notebook (fillable)

A fillable, Cornell-style notebook for Unit 2: Research Ready. Type your notes, cues, and summaries right in the PDF, or print it and write by hand. Each lesson page has a cue column, a notes column, and a summary box, plus dated lab-record pages you can turn in.

HBS Unit 2 notebook: Research Ready Fillable PDFCornell notes + lab recordsOpen
Resources & readings

Vetted readings and references for this unit. Use them to prepare, to catch up if you were absent, or to go deeper on today's target.

Practice: try a question, then check your answer

Claim ceiling for this check: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about today's lesson. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Quick self-check · commit, then reveal

A student tests whether louder music makes worms move faster. They change the volume, measure worm speed, and run the test on 4 worms in a warm room and 4 in a cold room. Name the independent variable, the dependent variable, and the confounding variable.

How sure are you?

Write an answer and pick a confidence to unlock the key.

Cumulative WebXam review · flash practice

Fast retrieval with instant answers, not the commit-then-reveal check above. Try each from memory first: write what you remember about the earlier units, then check yourself here.

Tap an answer to check it · nothing is recorded or graded
[Review: Reflexes: reaction time, signaling, and a patient diagnosis challenge] Why might a depressant drug increase a person's reaction time in a reflex test?
[Review: Everything Endocrine: hormones, feedback loops, and the blood-sugar model] Which gland releases glucagon when blood sugar falls too low?
[Review: Everything Endocrine: hormones, feedback loops, and the blood-sugar model] Which gland releases glucagon when blood sugar falls too low?
Why is the roundworm C. elegans frequently used as a model organism in biological research?
Missed class or ready for more?
Where this leads: careers
What to do if you were absent
If YOU are absent

Today is individual work you can do from home: complete the same target above, then submit your Notebook check.

FOR A GRADE
Open Schoology

Go to Schoology to turn this in. Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf. If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.

If MR. MENDOZA is absent

Class still runs. Complete the online activity above (it's self-guided). Need the concept taught without a teacher? Use this authoritative explainer:

Khan Academy: The science of biology (experimental design)
Optional extra credit (async)

You've passed Unit 2, so the optional extra-credit track is open. Complete reserved-unit work from home, including virtual labs, for extra credit. Each item shows its correct submission route.

Open the extra-credit track
How this is graded
For: Notebook check: Labeled sample experiment with independent, dependent, and controlled variables identified, plus a written confounding-variable example.
  • Complete
    Every required part of the artifact is present, nothing left blank.
  • Accurate
    The science and the data are correct and match the evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning
    You explain your claim with evidence and reasoning (CER), not just an answer.
  • Professional communication
    Clear, organized, labeled, and written the way a clinician or scientist would.
  • Submitted
    Go to Schoology to turn this in. Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf. If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.