What the IRF6 Protein Looks Like
What does the IRF6 actually look like?
💡 A 's shape determines its job, so where a variant lands on the protein predicts what job it breaks.
Prerequisite check
- A changes the sequence; a changes a control region and alters how much protein is made, without changing the sequence.
- IRF6 has an called MCS-9.7 about 10 kb where the AP-2alpha (TFAP2A) normally docks to switch IRF6 on.
What you will learn
Goal: Students will describe the IRF6 's two-domain architecture (a and a protein-binding SMIR/IAD domain) and explain why a variant's domain location predicts its effect.
- A is a part of a that folds on its own and does a specific job.
- IRF6 (467 amino acids) has a (residues 7 to 115, a winged-helix fold) and a C-terminal -binding (SMIR/IAD) domain, joined by a disordered linker (residues 121 to 156).
- changes are statistically enriched in the but not the .
- means a 's shape determines its job, so a variant's domain location predicts what job it breaks; a truncating change deletes whichever domains come after the cut.
Model: The IRF6 domain map, and the same variant data placed on it
IRF6 is a 467 amino acids long that folds into two main working parts, called domains, joined by a floppy linker (real positions from UniProt O14896). The (DBD), residues 7 to 115, is a winged helix-turn-helix shape that physically clamps onto DNA so IRF6 can switch target genes on; it is encoded by exons 3 to 4. The (SMIR / IAD) is C-terminal and links IRF6 to partner proteins so it can act as a team; it is encoded by exons 7 to 9. A disordered linker (residues 121 to 156) connects the two. R84 lives inside the DNA-binding domain.
Now place the Lesson 8 variants as positions on the map: R84C / R84H sit in the (residue 84) and abolish DNA binding (), causing severe PPS. L22P sits in the DNA-binding domain (residue 22) and abolishes DNA binding, causing VWS. S424L sits in the and decreases transcriptional activity, causing PPS. A truncating change (e.g. R250X) cuts the chain so the domains past the cut are lost, causing and VWS. The big reported pattern: changes are enriched in the DNA-binding domain but not the protein-binding domain.
Explore (work the model before reading on)
- How long is the IRF6 , and what are its two main domains?
- Which domain does residue 84 (the R84C hotspot) fall inside?
- What is the reported effect of variants in the (R84C, L22P)?
- changes pile up in the , and that domain's job is to grab DNA. Why would a change there be especially likely to break IRF6's function?
- A truncating change at residue 250 removes everything after position 250. Which domain is lost when the chain is cut at 250, and what job goes with it?
- Imagine a new IRF6 in the floppy linker (around residue 140), far from both domains. Predict whether it is more or less likely to be damaging than R84C, and explain using .
- In one sentence, what pattern links a variant's DOMAIN location to its likely effect on the ?
Guided notes
What a domain is
- A is a part of a that folds on its own and does a specific ____.
- IRF6 has two domains joined by a floppy linker.
IRF6's two domains
- The (residues 7 to ____): a winged helix that clamps onto ____ so IRF6 can switch target genes on; most damaging , including R84, land here.
- The (SMIR / IAD, near the C-end): links IRF6 to ____ proteins so it can work as part of a team.
Structure-function
- A 's shape determines its job, so WHERE a variant lands predicts WHAT job it breaks.
- A change in the wrecks DNA gripping; a truncating change deletes whichever domains come ____ the cut.
Reading the Research
- Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
- Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
- Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
- Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Using the database (what to capture)
Part of today's expected outcome is to actually open the tool below and write down the value it gives you. That captured value is the evidence you will use in your Claim, Evidence, Reasoning. Follow the steps, use the labeled screenshot so you do not get lost, and record each field.
The reference record for a : its length, its domains, and what each part does.
- 1Open uniprot.org and search IRF6 human, then open entry O14896.
- 2Scroll to the Family and Domains section.
- 3Read the length and which domains exist (for example the ).
- Accession (the protein's ID): O14896
- Length (amino acids): 467 aa
- Domains / regions: A DNA-binding domain and a protein-partner (SMIR) domain
Track your progress today
Check these off as you work through the lesson, then submit. This tells Mr. Mendoza how you're doing so he can help the class. It does not replace turning in your producible.
Use the code Mr. Mendoza gave you, not your name. Saved on this device.
- Read the Model and answered the Explore questions.
- Filled in the guided notes in my own words.
- Defined the new vocabulary with an example.
- Opened UniProt and recorded the value it gave me.
- Built the producible: Place three relatives' variants on the IRF6 domain map (a missense at residue 60, a missense at residue 424, and a nonsense at residue 100) and predict the consequence in one sentence each, naming the domain hit or lost and the job affected.
- Wrote my Claim, Evidence, and Reasoning exit ticket.
Exit ticket (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning)
- Claim: A variant's domain location helps predict ____.
- Evidence: In IRF6, changes are enriched in the ____ domain, where the 's job is to ____.
- Reasoning: Therefore knowing the domain map matters because ____.
| Criterion | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Every required part of the artifact is present and filled in. | Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank. | Several parts are missing. |
| Accurate | The science and data are correct and match the evidence. | Mostly correct, with a small factual slip. | Key science or data is wrong. |
| Scientific reasoning (CER) | States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning. | Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing. | Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning. |
| Professional communication | Clear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it. | Readable but disorganized or missing labels. | Hard to follow. |
| Submitted | Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed. | Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed. | Not turned in. |
- CompleteProficient: Nothing is left blank: the model fills every part of "Place three relatives' variants on the IRF6 domain map (a missense at residue 60, a missense at residue 424, and a nonsense at residue 100) and predict the consequence in one sentence each, naming the domain hit or lost and the job affected.".
- AccurateProficient: Every number and claim matches the case evidence.
- Scientific reasoning (CER)Proficient: It names a claim, cites the specific evidence, and explains the reasoning, not just the answer.
- Professional communicationProficient: It is organized and labeled like a real chart note.
- SubmittedProficient: It would be turned in on Schoology and confirmed.
Where this leads: careers
What's next: Our has critical domains. How can we tell which parts are so important that evolution never lets them change?
