Rough draft.This research track is under review with Dr. Atit's lab. Content and sequence may still change.
Read it in pieces

What the IRF6 Protein Looks Like

Take the reading one piece at a time. For each piece: read it once, underline the sentence that says what happens, then look up any word in the list. Tap a word to see its definition.

1

Piece 1 of 2

IRF6 is a protein 467 amino acids long that folds into two main working parts, called domains, joined by a floppy linker (real positions from UniProt O14896). The DNA-binding domain (DBD), residues 7 to 115, is a winged helix-turn-helix shape that physically clamps onto DNA so IRF6 can switch target genes on; it is encoded by exons 3 to 4. The protein-binding domain (SMIR / IAD) is C-terminal and links IRF6 to partner proteins so it can act as a team; it is encoded by exons 7 to 9. A disordered linker (residues 121 to 156) connects the two. R84 lives inside the DNA-binding domain.

2

Piece 2 of 2

Now place the Lesson 8 variants as positions on the map: R84C / R84H sit in the DNA-binding domain (residue 84) and abolish DNA binding (dominant-negative), causing severe PPS. L22P sits in the DNA-binding domain (residue 22) and abolishes DNA binding, causing VWS. S424L sits in the protein-binding domain and decreases transcriptional activity, causing PPS. A truncating change (e.g. R250X) cuts the chain so the domains past the cut are lost, causing haploinsufficiency and VWS. The big reported pattern: missense changes are enriched in the DNA-binding domain but not the protein-binding domain.

Explore

Reading the Research

What to read
Read the title and the abstract only, not the whole paper. Leslie EJ, et al. 2012. IRF6 variants in VWS and PPS. Genet Med. [PMID:23154523]
Why this source matters
This is the published evidence behind today's idea: A 's shape determines its job, so where a variant lands on the protein predicts what job it breaks.
Reading moves
  1. Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
  2. Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
  3. Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
  4. Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Stop point
You do not need the methods or statistics yet. If a sentence is about lab technique or math you have not learned, mark it and skip it.
Your output
Write one claim-evidence sentence: what this source claims, and the one piece of evidence that backs it up.

Now put it together: In one or two sentences, say what this whole reading is telling you about Mateo. Then go back to the lesson and fill in the guided notes.