Here's an example of what's due today

Disk diffusion and MIC lab

Wed, Sep 30, 2026 · Week 6 · Genetics of Disease (Medical Interventions)

Today's goal: Run a disk-diffusion test and connect zone of inhibition to minimum inhibitory concentration.

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.

Disk-diffusion data table
Completes: A data table listing each antibiotic, its measured zone of inhibition in millimeters, and a zone-size rank that is not a drug ranking, with a sentence on what zone size means for the same drug and its MIC.

Connection to MIC: a larger zone of inhibition means the antibiotic stopped bacterial growth even where it had spread thin and dilute, which points to a lower minimum inhibitory concentration (less drug needed to work).

Comparison, with its limit: C produced the widest zone (22 mm), then A (18 mm), then B (9 mm). Zone width cannot rank different antibiotics against each other, because each drug diffuses through agar at its own rate and each has its own clinical breakpoint, so this ranks the zones, not the drugs.

AntibioticZone of inhibition (mm)Zone rank (not a drug ranking)
Antibiotic C221 (widest zone)
Antibiotic A182
Antibiotic B93 (narrowest zone)
Disk-diffusion table listing three antibiotics with their zones of inhibition ranked by size; the rank orders zones, not drugs.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: A data table listing each antibiotic, its measured zone of inhibition in millimeters, and a zone-size rank that is not a drug ranking, with a sentence on what zone size means for the same drug and its MIC.

Build yours step by step
  1. Name the variables and include units.
  2. Enter observations without changing the raw values.
  3. Check labels, calculations, and patterns before interpreting the data.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Today you submit only the setup record (plate map, labels, predictions). A finished table like this one goes on the last page of your one debate PDF on Thursday, October 1, after you read your plate right after the John Carroll debate.

Turn in: Today, the setup record: plate map, plate labels with your period and code, and a prediction for each disk. On Thursday, October 1, the finished data table: antibiotic name, zone of inhibition (mm), and the zones ranked by size (not a drug ranking); plus one sentence on what a larger zone means for the same drug and its MIC.

Go to Schoology to turn this in.

Submit one PDF. Schoology attaches your name to your upload; on the page itself, write your period and code. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf.

Open Schoology PDF upload help

If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.

Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about today's lesson. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: CulturingSelf-check skill: Reading a zone of inhibition against its own drug's cutoff
In a Kirby-Bauer disk-diffusion test, antibiotic disk X produces a 24 mm clear zone and disk Y produces a 7 mm clear zone on the same bacterial lawn. Which statement do the two measurements support?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.

Why this practice matters

It builds this reusable test skill: Reading a zone of inhibition against its own drug's cutoff.

Use it on a new WebXam question
  1. Name the concept or data pattern being tested.
  2. Cross out choices that violate that rule or the evidence.
  3. Justify the best remaining choice before checking the answer.