Rough draft.This research track is under review with Dr. Atit's lab. Content and sequence may still change.
Read it in pieces

What Is Mateo's Complete Genetic Story?

Take the reading one piece at a time. For each piece: read it once, underline the sentence that says what happens, then look up any word in the list. Tap a word to see its definition.

1

Piece 1 of 2

Each link below was a lesson, and the Domain Report turns this list into one connected argument. Clue: an isolated (nonsyndromic) cleft, told apart from a syndromic one because lip pits are the tell for Van der Woude. Gene: IRF6 on chromosome 1q32.2. Variant: coding variants (such as R84C or truncations) cause syndromes, while the common regulatory SNP rs642961 lowers IRF6 by breaking an AP-2alpha enhancer site. Protein: IRF6 has a DNA-binding domain and a protein-binding domain, and loss of function gives haploinsufficiency. Network: IRF6 works with GRHL3 and downstream of p63 to build the periderm so palatal shelves fuse. Proof: knockout and rescue in mouse and zebrafish prove IRF6 is causal. Population: risk variants and their strength differ by ancestry (8q24 strong in Europeans, weak or absent elsewhere; rs642961 fails to replicate in African-ancestry samples). Risk: the family recurrence risk is empiric and multifactorial, roughly 2 to 5%. Treatment: molecular fixes work in animals only, all preclinical. Ethics: somatic vs germline, and equity of access, frame whether to act.

Words in this piece
domain reporthaploinsufficiency
2

Piece 2 of 2

Mateo's case pulls these together into one diagnosis: an isolated, nonsyndromic, multifactorial cleft lip and palate, with IRF6 standing as the exemplar gene of the periderm pathway behind it.

Explore

Reading the Research

What to read
Read the title and the abstract only, not the whole paper. Kondo et al. 2002, Mutations in IRF6 cause VWS and PPS (Nat Genet)
Why this source matters
This is the published evidence behind today's idea: Mateo's case is isolated, nonsyndromic, multifactorial CL/P with IRF6 as the exemplar gene, and the full story runs from clue to gene to variant to to network to proof to population to risk to treatment to ethics.
Reading moves
  1. Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
  2. Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
  3. Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
  4. Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Stop point
You do not need the methods or statistics yet. If a sentence is about lab technique or math you have not learned, mark it and skip it.
Your output
Write one claim-evidence sentence: what this source claims, and the one piece of evidence that backs it up.

Now put it together: In one or two sentences, say what this whole reading is telling you about Mateo. Then go back to the lesson and fill in the guided notes.