Which connections can the map show directly?
Use the labels and the picture's left-to-right, near-to-far, or before-and-after order. Name only what you can point to.
Why it matters: Genetic results can change family counseling and research decisions. They must be interpreted without turning risk into destiny or an uncertain variant into a diagnosis. Today you practice the professional reasoning behind that work: A pedigree shows how a trait travels through a family; it does not prove that an isolated case is non-genetic.
Reading standard pedigree symbols and classifying a case as isolated or familial
To find the cause, change one thing and watch what changes.





A neighborhood map shows which homes and streets connect. It usually does not show the buried pipes, wires, or private events inside each home.
Do not jump to the biology yet. Treat the picture as a small system. Track its parts, follow one change at a time, and keep more than one explanation open until the picture supplies a way to separate them.
Which connections can the map show directly?
Use the labels and the picture's left-to-right, near-to-far, or before-and-after order. Name only what you can point to.
What important system remains hidden underground?
Follow one object, stage, or path. Point to the first place where the situation changes instead of jumping to the ending.
Why would one affected home not prove a random event?
List more than one explanation that still fits. Name the extra observation that would help you separate those possibilities.

Work from the visible evidence. A useful answer names the part of the picture that supports it and leaves unknown causes open.
Use the everyday picture to answer today's question in plain words: Which connections can the map show directly?
You can complete today's required check without opening the technical details below.
Where the analogy stops: Families are not neighborhoods. The analogy models visible relationships versus hidden causes.
Mateo's cleft is best explained as a developmental pathway outcome with bounded evidence, not as one proven cause.
A pedigree shows how a trait travels through a family; it does not prove that an isolated case is non-genetic.
Educational illustration, not a clinical photograph or diagnostic result. Use the labeled evidence cards and claim ceiling.
Mateo's parents ask whether the empty family history means the cleft was only chance.
Choose the counseling statement and cite the pedigree plus its limit.
Everything required for today is above. Open these only if you want the explainer, source trail, or download files.
The everyday model and Tier 1 check are the complete required path for this lesson.
Use these checks to keep your place. They are not turned in through the portal.
Turn in: Genetics lesson 1: Chance or Genetic? Reading Mateo's Family Tree
Go to Schoology to turn this in.
Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf.
Open Schoology PDF upload helpIf you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
Goal: Students will read and build a three-generation pedigree using standard symbols and use it to tell an from a familial (inherited) one when the family history is sparse and uncertain.
Everything you need for today is on this page. These links are optional.
Everything required for today's decision is already in the case file and plain-language explainer. The links below are original papers and database records for teachers and advanced readers, not assigned student reading.
| Criterion | Proficient | Developing | Beginning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete | Every required part of the artifact is present and filled in. | Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank. | Several parts are missing. |
| Accurate | The science and data are correct and match the evidence. | Mostly correct, with a small factual slip. | Key science or data is wrong. |
| Scientific reasoning (CER) | States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning. | Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing. | Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning. |
| Professional communication | Clear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it. | Readable but disorganized or missing labels. | Hard to follow. |
| Submitted | Turned in through the route named under Submit here and confirmed. | Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed. | Not turned in. |
What's next: Mateo's looks isolated and his parents are unaffected, but a cleft can sometimes be one feature of a hidden syndrome. What would a syndrome look like, and how would we screen for one?