Rough draft.This research track is under review with Dr. Atit's lab. Content and sequence may still change.

Here's an example of what's due today

Mateo's Complete Anatomical and Surgical Story

Anatomical domain · Lesson 20 of 20 · Human Body Systems (HBS)

Today's goal: Synthesize the anatomical domain into one form-repair-consequence account of Mateo's case and reason from the assembled evidence to the diagnosis of an isolated, nonsyndromic complete unilateral CL/P (Veau III).

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your wording should be your own.

Anatomical Domain Report paragraph

Completes: A five-to-seven-sentence synthesis naming the diagnosis, told as form-repair-consequence, ending with the isolated evidence.

Mateo has an isolated, nonsyndromic complete unilateral (left) cleft of the lip, alveolus, and palate, classified Veau III. In form, the orbicularis oris ring was interrupted at the lip and the levator veli palatini failed to form its midline palatal sling. In repair, cheiloplasty rebuilt the lip ring at about 3 to 6 months and palatoplasty rebuilt the sling at about 10 to 14 months, with an alveolar bone graft before age 9 to give his canine bone. As consequences, the team watches for a residual fistula or VPI, acquired middle-ear fluid, and a likely missing left lateral incisor at the cleft. The single strongest piece of evidence that this is isolated rather than syndromic is that his newborn exam found no other birth defects and no finding in nineteen lessons ever appeared outside the cleft region, so a severe but local defect is exactly the picture of an isolated cleft.

Learn first

How this was built, step by step

The finished product above did not appear all at once. Here is the path from the question to the turned-in work, so you can follow the same steps.

1Start from today's question: When we assemble Mateo's whole anatomical and surgical picture, what exactly does he have, and how do we know it is that and not something larger?
2Work the Model and the Explore questions to reason it out before writing anything.
3Pull the specific evidence the product needs from the reading and any database you used.
4Write it up in the required format: Write Mateo's anatomical in one short paragraph (five to seven sentences). It must (1) name the diagnosis, (2) tell it as form, then repair, then consequence, and (3) end with the one sentence of evidence that makes it isolated rather than syndromic. This paragraph is your team's deliverable to the rest of the case.
5Check it against the rubric, then submit.

How this is graded (rubric)

For: Write Mateo's anatomical Domain Report in one short paragraph (five to seven sentences). It must (1) name the diagnosis, (2) tell it as form, then repair, then consequence, and (3) end with the one sentence of evidence that makes it isolated rather than syndromic. This paragraph is your team's deliverable to the rest of the case.

Criterion	Proficient	Developing	Beginning
Complete	Every required part of the artifact is present and filled in.	Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank.	Several parts are missing.
Accurate	The science and data are correct and match the evidence.	Mostly correct, with a small factual slip.	Key science or data is wrong.
Scientific reasoning (CER)	States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning.	Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing.	Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning.
Professional communication	Clear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it.	Readable but disorganized or missing labels.	Hard to follow.
Submitted	Turned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed.	Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed.	Not turned in.

How the model answer scores against this rubric

CompleteProficient: Nothing is left blank: the model fills every part of "Write Mateo's anatomical Domain Report in one short paragraph (five to seven sentences). It must (1) name the diagnosis, (2) tell it as form, then repair, then consequence, and (3) end with the one sentence of evidence that makes it isolated rather than syndromic. This paragraph is your team's deliverable to the rest of the case.".
AccurateProficient: Every number and claim matches the case evidence.
Scientific reasoning (CER)Proficient: It names a claim, cites the specific evidence, and explains the reasoning, not just the answer.
Professional communicationProficient: It is organized and labeled like a real chart note.
SubmittedProficient: It would be turned in on Schoology and confirmed.

Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: Structure and Function (HBS, head and neck)Self-check skill: Reasoning from assembled findings to an isolated nonsyndromic diagnosis

A student argues that a complete Veau III cleft must be part of a larger syndrome because it is so severe. Using the assembled anatomical record, what is the strongest reason the cleft is instead isolated and nonsyndromic?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.

Back to this lesson