Here's an example of what's due today

Infection-control CER

Thu, Nov 19, 2026 · Week 13 · Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science)

Today's goal: Students write a CER recommending an infection-control plan supported by chain-of-infection evidence.

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.

Worked CER on a parallel case
Completes: Models the infection-control argument on a different scenario (a norovirus outbreak in a school cafeteria): a claim, evidence, and reasoning paragraph that names the highest-priority control, ties it to a specific link in the chain of infection, predicts its effect, and states assumptions. Use it to see the format and depth, then build your own argument for your assigned case.

Claim: The highest-priority control for this cafeteria outbreak is a stay-home rule that keeps any food handler with vomiting or diarrhea out of the kitchen until 48 hours after symptoms stop.

Evidence: The chain trace showed norovirus spreading through the reservoir link, when one food handler who worked while sick shed virus onto serving utensils and ready-to-eat trays. From there the mode of transmission was fecal-oral contact through contaminated food, and the susceptible hosts were students whose only shared exposure was the lunch line. Handwashing and surface cleaning matter, but the sick worker was the source feeding the whole chain, and staff scheduling is a link the school controls directly.

Reasoning: Removing an infected reservoir shuts off the supply of new agent before it can ever reach a portal of entry. If no sick handler touches the food, there is nothing for handwashing or cleaning to catch up on later, so this breaks the chain at its source rather than trying to intercept virus that has already spread across trays and hands. Norovirus is shed in very high amounts and stays contagious for about two days after symptoms end, so a 48-hour exclusion targets the exact window when a returning worker is still a reservoir.

Expected effect: If the stay-home rule is enforced, foodborne transmission events of this type should drop sharply, because the single pathway in this scenario ran through food touched by an infected handler.

Assumptions and limitations: I assume the sick handler was the true source and that workers will report symptoms honestly rather than come in for a paycheck. If the virus actually entered through a contaminated food shipment or a sick student touching a shared drink station, exclusion alone would not be enough, and we would need to target a different link such as the mode of transmission or the portal of entry.

Also due today: Submit your CER in Schoology under the Thursday Infection-Control CER assignment before the end of the period.

Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: Handling, Preparation, Storage and DisposalSelf-check skill: Choosing the highest-priority infection control and justifying it by mechanism
In an infection-control CER, why is naming the mechanism (how the control breaks a specific link) stronger than simply recommending better hygiene?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.