Here's an example of what's due today

Microarray report submit

Fri, Oct 30, 2026 · Week 10 · Genetics of Disease (Medical Interventions)

Today's goal: Finalize and submit your microarray analysis report connecting expression data to disease risk.

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.

Microarray analysis report
Completes: Completes the unit report: a combined microarray analysis with the fold-change table, shaded heat map, and a CER claim that ties every statement back to a data value and separates risk from diagnosis.

Report summary: I combined my fold-change table, heat map, and claim into one report and checked that every claim points to a number.

Claim: This sample shows an expression pattern consistent with elevated disease risk.

Evidence anchored in data: Gene 3 fold change 4.0 and Gene 1 fold change 3.2 are both strongly upregulated; Gene 2 (0.25) and Gene 4 (0.5) are downregulated, matching the reference disease signature.

Reasoning: The upregulated cluster raises the probability of disease, but because expression data cannot confirm disease on its own, I state risk and recommend clinical follow-up rather than a diagnosis.

Revision I made with feedback: I replaced the vague phrase 'the gene went up' with the quantified 'Gene 3 had a fold change of 4.0,' so every claim now traces to a specific value.

GeneFold changeLabelIn claim?
Gene 13.2upregulatedyes (evidence)
Gene 20.25downregulatedcontext
Gene 34.0upregulatedyes (evidence)
Gene 40.5downregulatedcontext
Report check table showing which fold-change values (Gene 1 at 3.2 and Gene 3 at 4.0) are cited as evidence in the claim.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the unit report: a combined microarray analysis with the fold-change table, shaded heat map, and a CER claim that ties every statement back to a data value and separates risk from diagnosis.

Build yours step by step
  1. State the question and method.
  2. Present the observations and data with units.
  3. Explain the result, limitations, and next investigation.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Submit your completed report to Schoology.

Turn in: Microarray analysis report

Go to Schoology to turn this in.

Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf.

Open Schoology PDF upload help

If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.

Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about microarray report submit. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: Molecular and Genetic TechnologySelf-check skill: Anchoring every claim in a scientific report to a specific data value
A peer review flags one line in a microarray report: 'The gene went up a lot.' Why is this line weaker than the rest of the report?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.

Why this practice matters

It builds this reusable test skill: Anchoring every claim in a scientific report to a specific data value.

Use it on a new WebXam question
  1. Name the concept or data pattern being tested.
  2. Cross out choices that violate that rule or the evidence.
  3. Justify the best remaining choice before checking the answer.