Here's an example of what's due today

Gel electrophoresis lab

Fri, Oct 23, 2026 · Week 9 · Genetics of Disease (Medical Interventions)

Today's goal: Run or model gel electrophoresis and interpret band positions to compare DNA fragments.

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.

Gel banding interpretation
Completes: Completes the gel lab analysis: a banding data table with migration distances, a largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.

I recorded how far each band traveled from the well and used the size ladder to estimate the unknown bands.

Ranking, largest to smallest: Band 1 traveled the least (largest), then Band 2, then Band 3 traveled the farthest (smallest).

Size estimates: Unknown Band 2 lined up between the 1000 bp and 750 bp ladder bands, so I estimate about 850 bp. Unknown Band 3 lined up near the 500 bp ladder band, so I estimate about 500 bp.

Why smaller fragments travel farther: DNA is negatively charged, so the electric field pulls all fragments toward the positive end. The agarose acts as a sieve, and smaller fragments thread through the gel's pores more easily, so they move farther in the same time.

BandMigration distanceSize estimate
Ladder 1000 bp18 mm1000 bp (known)
Unknown Band 221 mm~850 bp
Ladder 500 bp30 mm500 bp (known)
Unknown Band 330 mm~500 bp
Gel banding table: shorter migration matches larger size; Unknown Band 2 estimated at 850 bp, Unknown Band 3 at 500 bp against the ladder.
Why this matters

This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Completes the gel lab analysis: a banding data table with migration distances, a largest-to-smallest ranking, two size estimates against the ladder, and an explanation of the size-migration relationship.

Build yours step by step
  1. State the question and method.
  2. Present the observations and data with units.
  3. Explain the result, limitations, and next investigation.
Change it for a new task

Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.

Also due today: Submit your data table and interpretation to Schoology.

Turn in: Gel banding interpretation

Go to Schoology to turn this in.

Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf.

Open Schoology PDF upload help

If you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.

Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about gel electrophoresis lab. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.

Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: Molecular and Genetic TechnologySelf-check skill: Relating fragment size to migration distance on a gel
On an agarose gel, one DNA fragment has traveled much farther from the well than another. What does this tell you about the two fragments?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.

Why this practice matters

It builds this reusable test skill: Relating fragment size to migration distance on a gel.

Use it on a new WebXam question
  1. Name the concept or data pattern being tested.
  2. Cross out choices that violate that rule or the evidence.
  3. Justify the best remaining choice before checking the answer.