Here's an example of what's due today

CER mini-report

Mon, Mar 15, 2027 · Week 9 · Biotechnology for Health (Biomedical Innovations)

Today's goal: Write a CER conclusion that states limitations of your physiology analysis.

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.

Worked CER on a parallel case (respiratory rate)
Completes: Worked CER on a parallel case: models the Problem 2 mini-report format (claim answering a research question, statistical evidence with values, reasoning, and at least two honest limitations) using a different physiology comparison so it guides format and depth without answering today's heart-rate prompt.

Research question for this parallel case: Does a slow paced-breathing exercise lower a person's resting breathing rate compared to normal quiet sitting?\n\nClaim: A slow paced-breathing exercise significantly lowers resting breathing rate compared to normal quiet sitting.\n\nEvidence: My quiet-sitting mean was 15.4 breaths per minute (SD 1.1) and my paced-breathing mean was 9.8 breaths per minute (SD 1.3), a difference of about 5.6 breaths per minute. A two-sample t-test gave p of about 0.0003, below 0.05.\n\nReasoning: Because the p-value is below 0.05, the 5.6 breath-per-minute drop is too large to be explained by normal measurement variation alone, so the paced-breathing exercise is the most likely cause of the lower breathing rate. The small standard deviations show my readings within each condition were consistent, which strengthens the comparison.\n\nLimitations:\n1. I tested only one subject, so I cannot generalize to all people; lung capacity and baseline breathing habits vary from person to person.\n2. I controlled the sitting position but not factors like recent physical activity or anxiety before the session, which could raise the baseline breathing rate and exaggerate the difference.\n\nThese limitations do not erase the result; they tell a reader exactly how far the conclusion can be trusted.

Also due today: Submit the Problem 2 analysis mini-report to the Schoology assignment before the end of Thursday class. This is due before Fall Break.

Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: Laboratory Standard Operational ProceduresSelf-check skill: Recognizing why stating limitations strengthens a scientific report
In a CER conclusion, why does naming honest limitations (such as testing only one subject) make the report stronger rather than weaker?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.