Rough draft.This research track is under review with Dr. Atit's lab. Content and sequence may still change.
Read it in pieces

How Do We Prove the Gene Causes It?

Take the reading one piece at a time. For each piece: read it once, underline the sentence that says what happens, then look up any word in the list. Tap a word to see its definition.

1

Piece 1 of 2

Scientists make a knockout, an animal with a gene deliberately switched off, and compare it to a normal wild-type animal. For IRF6 the results line up across two species. A wild-type mouse differentiates its periderm, fuses its palate, and lives; an Irf6-knockout mouse fails to form periderm, develops a cleft palate with oral and skin adhesions, and dies perinatally. A wild-type zebrafish has a normal anterior neurocranium (the fish primary-palate analog) and mouth; an irf6-knockout zebrafish has a cleft of the anterior neurocranium and a cleft-like mouth, with the downstream target esrp1 dropping about 80%. The same gene, knocked out in a mouse and in a fish whose ancestor we shared long ago, produces a cleft in both.

Words in this piece
2

Piece 2 of 2

The closing argument is the rescue experiment: put the gene back and see if the cleft goes away. In zebrafish, injecting normal irf6 mRNA into irf6-null embryos restored esrp1 and rescued the cleft. In mouse, re-expressing Irf6 partially rescued: the pups survived and skin adhesions resolved, though the cleft palate persisted because IRF6 was not restored in the periderm cells themselves.

Words in this piece
Explore

Reading the Research

What to read
Read the title and the abstract only, not the whole paper. Kousa et al. 2017, IRF6 partial rescue in Irf6 knockout mice (Dev Dyn)
Why this source matters
This is the published evidence behind today's idea: When removing a gene breaks the process AND restoring it fixes the process, the gene is a cause, not a bystander; this is how the field proved IRF6 loss causes clefting.
Reading moves
  1. Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
  2. Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
  3. Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
  4. Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Stop point
You do not need the methods or statistics yet. If a sentence is about lab technique or math you have not learned, mark it and skip it.
Your output
Write one claim-evidence sentence: what this source claims, and the one piece of evidence that backs it up.

Now put it together: In one or two sentences, say what this whole reading is telling you about Mateo. Then go back to the lesson and fill in the guided notes.