Rough draft.This research track is under review with Dr. Atit's lab. Content and sequence may still change.
Read it in pieces

Does IRF6 Work Alone?

Take the reading one piece at a time. For each piece: read it once, underline the sentence that says what happens, then look up any word in the list. Tap a word to see its definition.

1

Piece 1 of 2

Read five real findings before looking at the diagram. Clue A: most Van der Woude syndrome (cleft plus lip pits) is caused by loss-of-function variants in IRF6. Clue B: a smaller set of Van der Woude families have no IRF6 mutation but instead carry mutations in GRHL3, which causes the same periderm and cleft problem. Clue C: in zebrafish and mouse, turning IRF6 off lowers the expression of GRHL3 and of KLF17 (fish) or KLF4 (mouse), and forcing IRF6 back on brings those genes back up. Clue D: the transcription factor p63 (TP63) sits above IRF6 and is needed to keep IRF6 switched on in the epithelium. Clue E: a newly reported cause of Van der Woude is loss of PRKCI, which acts upstream of IRF6.

Words in this piece
2

Piece 2 of 2

The circuit to reconstruct is: upstream signals (including PRKCI) feed a hidden node that keeps IRF6 on; IRF6 partners with GRHL3, and either one failing causes the disease; IRF6 then drives KLF4 and KLF17 downstream. The hidden node is the gene in Clue D.

Words in this piece
Explore

Reading the Research

What to read
Read the title and the abstract only, not the whole paper. Leslie et al. 2012, IRF6 variants in VWS and PPS (Genet Med)
Why this source matters
This is the published evidence behind today's idea: IRF6 does not work alone: it is one node in the p63 to IRF6 to GRHL3 network, which is why two patients can have the same from breaks in different genes of the same circuit.
Reading moves
  1. Skim the title and abstract first to get the gist.
  2. Circle the one sentence that states the main claim.
  3. Box the evidence the authors give for that claim.
  4. Mark one sentence that confuses you, and move on.
Stop point
You do not need the methods or statistics yet. If a sentence is about lab technique or math you have not learned, mark it and skip it.
Your output
Write one claim-evidence sentence: what this source claims, and the one piece of evidence that backs it up.

Now put it together: In one or two sentences, say what this whole reading is telling you about Mateo. Then go back to the lesson and fill in the guided notes.