Rough draft.This research track is under review with Dr. Atit's lab. Content and sequence may still change.
Here's an example of what's due today

From a Question to a Testable Hypothesis

Experimental Design domain · Lesson 2 of 20 · Biomedical Innovations (BI)

Today's goal: Students will write a testable hypothesis and its null hypothesis, and identify the independent variable, dependent variable, controlled variables, and control group for a study of Mateo's question.

Learn first

What a finished product looks like

This is a model of the work you should turn in. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your wording should be your own.

Study-design card
Completes: A completed variable card for a falsifiable cleft-surgery hypothesis.

Study-design card (surgery-timing question):

  • Hypothesis: Repairing the palate at 6 months rather than 12 months reduces velopharyngeal insufficiency at age 5.
  • Null hypothesis (H-zero): The 6-month and 12-month groups have the same rate of velopharyngeal insufficiency at age 5.
  • Independent variable: timing of surgery (6 vs 12 months).
  • Dependent variable: rate of velopharyngeal insufficiency at age 5.
  • Two controlled variables: same standardized surgical technique for every child; same blinded speech-assessment method.
  • Control group: the 12-month (standard-timing) group.

Result that would force rejection of the hypothesis: an equal or higher speech-problem rate in the 6-month group (for example 15.0% vs 15.0%) would fail to reject the null and count against the prediction.

Also due today: Underline which slot is the independent variable so a partner can check it is what you change, not what you measure.

Learn first

How this was built, step by step

The finished product above did not appear all at once. Here is the path from the question to the turned-in work, so you can follow the same steps.

  1. 1Start from today's question: How do we turn our PICO question into a hypothesis that an experiment could actually disprove, and what parts of the study must we control?
  2. 2Work the Model and the Explore questions to reason it out before writing anything.
  3. 3Pull the specific evidence the product needs from the reading and any database you used.
  4. 4Write it up in the required format: Fill in a study-design card for Mateo's surgical-timing question: hypothesis, , , , two controlled variables, and ; then write one sentence naming the result that would force you to reject your hypothesis.
  5. 5Check it against the rubric, then submit.
How this is graded (rubric)
For: Fill in a study-design card for Mateo's surgical-timing question: hypothesis, null hypothesis, independent variable, dependent variable, two controlled variables, and control group; then write one sentence naming the result that would force you to reject your hypothesis.
CriterionProficientDevelopingBeginning
CompleteEvery required part of the artifact is present and filled in.Most parts are present, but one is missing or left blank.Several parts are missing.
AccurateThe science and data are correct and match the evidence.Mostly correct, with a small factual slip.Key science or data is wrong.
Scientific reasoning (CER)States a claim, backs it with specific evidence, and explains the reasoning.Has a claim and evidence, but the reasoning is thin or missing.Gives an answer with no evidence or reasoning.
Professional communicationClear, organized, and labeled the way a clinician or scientist would write it.Readable but disorganized or missing labels.Hard to follow.
SubmittedTurned in the right way (Schoology for routine work) and confirmed.Turned in, but in the wrong place or unconfirmed.Not turned in.
How the model answer scores against this rubric
  • CompleteProficient: Nothing is left blank: the model fills every part of "Fill in a study-design card for Mateo's surgical-timing question: hypothesis, null hypothesis, independent variable, dependent variable, two controlled variables, and control group; then write one sentence naming the result that would force you to reject your hypothesis.".
  • AccurateProficient: Every number and claim matches the case evidence.
  • Scientific reasoning (CER)Proficient: It names a claim, cites the specific evidence, and explains the reasoning, not just the answer.
  • Professional communicationProficient: It is organized and labeled like a real chart note.
  • SubmittedProficient: It would be turned in on Schoology and confirmed.
Check yourself

WebXam problem for today's skill

One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.

WebXam-style domain: Experimental design and variablesSelf-check skill: Identifying the independent variable, dependent variable, and control group
In the TOPS trial, infants were assigned to palate repair at 6 or 12 months, every surgeon used the same technique, and a speech problem was measured at age 5. Which choice correctly labels the independent variable, dependent variable, and a controlled variable?

Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.