Ethics of monitoring
Fri, Oct 16, 2026 · Week 8 · Principles of Biomedical Technology (Principles of Biomedical Science)
Today's goal: Debate whether wearables and continuous monitoring help or harm patients, and defend your view.
This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.
Claim: A home blood glucose monitor that automatically uploads readings to a patient's care team helps patients more than it harms them, but only when the patient gives informed consent to that data sharing.\n\nEvidence: Automatic uploading lets a nurse or doctor spot dangerous highs and lows between visits and adjust insulin sooner, which can prevent emergencies for people with diabetes. The same feature also sends a stream of personal health data outside the home, where it could be seen by more people than the patient expects or used in ways the patient never agreed to.\n\nReasoning: The deciding factor is informed consent, which means the patient understands what data is collected, who can see it, and how it will be used before agreeing to share it. If the patient knows those terms and still chooses to share, the benefit of faster medical response outweighs the loss of some privacy. A limitation is that uploaded readings are only numbers without context, so a sudden low value could reflect a device error rather than a real emergency. Because of this, the care team should confirm an unusual reading with the patient before changing treatment.
This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: A short written argument taking a side on whether a home blood glucose monitor that automatically shares readings with a care team helps or harms patients, with the reasoning grounded in informed consent and data privacy.
- Write one defensible claim.
- Choose specific evidence that supports the claim.
- Explain the scientific rule that connects the evidence to the claim.
Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.
Also due today: Post the CER to Schoology discussion or hand in the written copy before leaving.
Turn in: Worked CER on a parallel case
Go to Schoology to turn this in.
Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf.
Open Schoology PDF upload helpIf you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about ethics of monitoring. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.
One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.
Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.
It builds this reusable test skill: Defining patient autonomy and the data limits of wearables.
- Name the concept or data pattern being tested.
- Cross out choices that violate that rule or the evidence.
- Justify the best remaining choice before checking the answer.

