CER mini-report
Tue, Mar 16, 2027 · Week 9 · Biotechnology for Health (Biomedical Innovations)
Today's goal: Write a CER conclusion that states limitations of your physiology analysis.
This is a model of the work you should turn in today. Use it to check your own: match the structure and the level of detail, do not copy it. Your data and wording should be your own.
Research question for this parallel case: Does a slow paced-breathing exercise lower a person's resting breathing rate compared to normal quiet sitting?\n\nClaim: A slow paced-breathing exercise significantly lowers resting breathing rate compared to normal quiet sitting.\n\nEvidence: My quiet-sitting mean was 15.4 breaths per minute (SD 1.1) and my paced-breathing mean was 9.8 breaths per minute (SD 1.3), a difference of about 5.6 breaths per minute. A two-sample t-test gave p of about 0.0003, below 0.05.\n\nReasoning: Because the p-value is below 0.05, the 5.6 breath-per-minute drop is too large to be explained by normal measurement variation alone, so the paced-breathing exercise is the most likely cause of the lower breathing rate. The small standard deviations show my readings within each condition were consistent, which strengthens the comparison.\n\nLimitations:\n1. I tested only one subject, so I cannot generalize to all people; lung capacity and baseline breathing habits vary from person to person.\n2. I controlled the sitting position but not factors like recent physical activity or anxiety before the session, which could raise the baseline breathing rate and exaggerate the difference.\n\nThese limitations do not erase the result; they tell a reader exactly how far the conclusion can be trusted.
This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: Worked CER on a parallel case: models the Problem 2 mini-report format (claim answering a research question, statistical evidence with values, reasoning, and at least two honest limitations) using a different physiology comparison so it guides format and depth without answering today's heart-rate prompt.
- Write one defensible claim.
- Choose specific evidence that supports the claim.
- Explain the scientific rule that connects the evidence to the claim.
Keep the structure. Replace the question, facts, measurements, and evidence. Then recheck units, vocabulary, and whether the conclusion goes beyond the evidence.
Also due today: Submit the Problem 2 analysis mini-report on Schoology before the end of Thursday class. This is due before Fall Break.
Turn in: Worked CER on a parallel case (respiratory rate)
Go to Schoology to turn this in.
Submit one PDF. Put your first and last name in the document header. Name the file: FirstName LastName - Assignment Title - YYYY-MM-DD.pdf.
Open Schoology PDF upload helpIf you cannot get in, see Mr. Mendoza. Do not skip the work.
Claim ceiling: Today's evidence supports a classroom claim about CER mini-report. It cannot prove causation, diagnose a real patient, or justify action outside this room.
One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.
Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.
It builds this reusable test skill: Recognizing why stating limitations strengthens a scientific report.
- Name the concept or data pattern being tested.
- Cross out choices that violate that rule or the evidence.
- Justify the best remaining choice before checking the answer.

