Trace a patient route and find the delay
Mon, Feb 8, 2027 · Week 4 · Biotechnology for Health (Biomedical Innovations)
Today's goal: Use the supplied times to map a patient route, find a likely bottleneck, and propose one change to test.
This print-shop example shows how to organize your work. Use the supplied F0 to F4 patient-flow records for your assignment and write in your own words. Do not collect or invent patient data.
Model R is fictional. Route: job arrives → one printer prints → job is collected. The printer is ready at 10:00, takes 6 minutes per job, and runs without breaks. Collection is immediate. Jobs are served in arrival order. R1 arrives at 10:00 and prints from 10:00 to 10:06. R2 arrives at 10:02 and prints from 10:06 to 10:12. R3 arrives at 10:04 and prints from 10:12 to 10:18.
Waits before the printer: R1 = 0 minutes, R2 = 4 minutes, R3 = 8 minutes. I label these at the queue before printing. The printer is the likely bottleneck here: jobs arrive every 2 minutes but one printer needs 6 minutes per job. R2 and R3 show a growing wait.
I would test a second printer using the same arrivals and job lengths. A drawback is the extra cost and space. I would compare average wait before and after the change, keeping print quality the same. Three jobs cannot show demand all day, and this model does not include equipment failures.
| Record | Arrival | Print start | Print end | Wait (minutes) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 10:00 | 10:00 | 10:06 | 0 |
| R2 | 10:02 | 10:06 | 10:12 | 4 |
| R3 | 10:04 | 10:12 | 10:18 | 8 |
This model shows the level of evidence and organization needed to complete: A separate, original workflow example. Use its structure for your F0 to F4 diagram and explanation; it contains no official PLTW case answers.
- Open the patient-flow practice handout. Read the route and F0 rules. These are fictional records, not real patients or the official PLTW case.
- Read records F1 to F4 and the worked F1 calculation. Find the waits before the nurse and clinician for F2, F3, and F4. Label each answer in minutes.
- Draw the four F0 steps with arrows, staff roles, and both waiting points. Add all four records' waiting times. Explain the likely bottleneck using two records and one F0 rule. Propose one change to test, a possible drawback, and a before-and-after measure.
- Check the handout's turn-in section. Save your diagram and explanation together as one PDF. Submit it in Wk4 Lab notebook: Patient flow workflow using the Schoology link below. Keep one question the model cannot answer.
Use unchanged fictional F0 to F4 records for your diagram and explanation. Model R is a separate print-shop example. Propose a test only; no experiment, treatment decision or proven improvement is required. Official PLTW work remains separate.
Also due today: Turn in your own F0 to F4 diagram and explanation together, not this print-shop model. The patient-flow handout links to Wk4 Lab notebook: Patient flow workflow in Schoology.
Use the patient-flow practice handout for your own records and four-step task. Keep Model R separate.
Submit one PDF with your labeled diagram, waiting times, and explanation in Wk4 Lab notebook: Patient flow workflow. Use the exact Schoology assignment linked here and follow its posted due date. Check the uploaded preview.
Schoology: Wk4 Lab notebook, Patient flow workflowClaim ceiling: Four fictional records can show a likely bottleneck in this model. They cannot prove a change is safe or show what happens in a real hospital all day.
One exam-style question that uses exactly what you practiced today. Try it before you reveal the answer, then read why each choice is right or wrong.
Tap an answer to see the full explanation. Nothing is recorded or graded.
It builds this reusable test skill: Separating wait time from task time.
- Name the concept or data pattern being tested.
- Cross out choices that violate that rule or the evidence.
- Justify the best remaining choice before checking the answer.