ELA in Science
CoreScientific reading: reading a paper

How to Read a Science Paper Step by Step

Read a research paper in a smart order (abstract, figures, conclusion, then methods) using a three-pass plan, and pull out the claim, evidence, and reasoning.

Why this matters

Scientists almost never read a paper straight from the top to the bottom. That would be slow, and most of the details would not stick. Instead, they read in a smart order: the abstract for the big picture, then the figures and tables for the actual results, then the conclusion or discussion for what the authors think it means, and the methods only when they need to judge how the work was done. They do this in passes, getting a little deeper each time, and they read with a pen so they can find the claim, the evidence, and the reasoning. Doctors use this skill to keep up with new treatments without reading every word, researchers use it to screen dozens of papers a week, and science journalists use it to explain a study fairly. Learn the order and the passes, and a paper that looked impossible becomes something you can actually get through.

Standards this builds
  • Common Core · RST.9-10.2Determine the central ideas of a science text and summarize the key supporting details and conclusions accurately.
  • Common Core · RST.9-10.7Translate information expressed in words into visual form (a table or graph) and translate information in a table or graph into words.
  • NGSS · SEP-8Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: read and evaluate scientific texts and figures to gather and judge evidence.
  • Ohio · Ohio ELA RST.9-10.5Analyze how a science text organizes its ideas, including sections such as the abstract, results, and conclusion.
  • AP · AP Bio SP 4Analyze and evaluate data and models, including reading graphs and tables to identify patterns and support or challenge a claim.
Builds on (2 levels back)inferred · high confidence
  • Read a value from a graph or table: The figures hold the paper's results, so students must be able to read a bar off a graph or a number out of a table before a paper makes sense.
  • Tell apart claim, evidence, and reasoning: Reading a paper means finding its claim and the evidence behind it, so students first need to recognize those three moves.
  • Separate a main idea from a supporting detail: A smart reading order depends on grabbing the big idea from the abstract before diving into details.

Prerequisites are inferred: pending teacher review.

Re-learn the skill with worked practice and clear examples.

Now read a paper in the smart order and read the figures carefully. The order is: (1) abstract for the big picture, (2) figures and tables with their captions for the results, (3) conclusion or discussion for the meaning, (4) methods only if you need to judge the study. Use the figure below and follow the numbered steps.

Step 1: Step 1 and 2: abstract, then figures
Start with the abstract to get the big picture. Then go straight to the figures and tables. Read each caption first, then find the axes or column headings so you know what is being measured before you read the bars or numbers.
Step 2: Read the graph the right way
On this bar graph, the y-axis is Survival (percent) and each bar is one drug. Read up from a bar to its value. Drug A reaches 40 percent and Drug B reaches 75 percent, so Drug B had higher survival.
A bar graph titled Survival after treatment, y-axis Survival percent from 0 to 100, Drug A bar at 40 percent, Drug B bar at 75 percent
Step 3: Step 3 and 4: conclusion, then methods only if needed
Next read the conclusion or discussion to see what the authors claim the results mean. Read the methods last, and only if you need to judge how the study was done (for example, how many people were tested).
Practice

Following the smart reading order, you have already read the abstract. Which section should you read SECOND?

Reviewed
  1. A.The methods, word for word
  2. B.The reference list
  3. C.The figures and tables with their captions
  4. D.The author biographies
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: C. The figures and tables with their captions

  1. Step 1: Recall the order: The smart order is abstract, then figures and tables, then conclusion, then methods if needed.
  2. Step 2: Pick what comes after the abstract: Right after the big picture, you go to the figures and tables to see the actual results.

Why it's right: In the smart reading order you read the abstract first and then go straight to the figures and tables, because that is where the results live.

Why the others miss:
  • A: Methods are read last, and only if you need to judge how the study was done.
  • B: The reference list is not part of the reading-for-results order.
  • D: Author biographies are not part of the reading order at all.

Aligned to Ohio ELA RST.9-10.5: analyze how a text is organized · reading level ~grade 9

The bar graph shows survival after treatment for two drugs. Which statement is BEST supported by the figure?

Reviewed
A bar graph titled Survival after treatment, Drug A bar at 40 percent, Drug B bar at 75 percent
  1. A.Drug B had higher survival than Drug A.
  2. B.Drug A had higher survival than Drug B.
  3. C.The two drugs had equal survival.
  4. D.Neither drug had any survivors.
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: A. Drug B had higher survival than Drug A.

  1. Step 1: Read each bar's value: Read up from each bar to the y-axis. Drug A reaches 40 percent and Drug B reaches 75 percent.
  2. Step 2: Compare the two: 75 percent is greater than 40 percent, so Drug B had higher survival.

Why it's right: The Drug B bar reaches 75 percent and the Drug A bar reaches 40 percent, and 75 is greater than 40, so Drug B had higher survival.

Why the others miss:
  • B: This reverses the bars; Drug A is at 40 percent, which is lower, not higher.
  • C: The bars are different heights (40 versus 75), so survival was not equal.
  • D: Both bars are well above zero, so both drugs had survivors.

Aligned to Common Core RST.9-10.7: read a value from a graph · reading level ~grade 9

A paper's discussion says: 'The vaccine group had 3 infections while the placebo group had 30, showing the vaccine lowered infections because it trained the immune system to fight the virus.' In this sentence, which words are the EVIDENCE?

Reviewed
  1. A.'the vaccine lowered infections'
  2. B.'3 infections' and '30' infections in the two groups
  3. C.'it trained the immune system to fight the virus'
  4. D.'The vaccine group'
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: B. '3 infections' and '30' infections in the two groups

  1. Step 1: Name the three parts: Evidence is the specific data, the claim is the main point, and the reasoning is the science idea that links them.
  2. Step 2: Find the data: The specific numbers, 3 infections versus 30, are the data pulled from the study, so they are the evidence.

Why it's right: Evidence is the specific data from the study, and the numbers 3 infections versus 30 infections are that data.

Why the others miss:
  • A: This is the claim (the main point), not the data.
  • C: This is the reasoning (the science idea), not the data.
  • D: This just names a group; it is not the data by itself.

Aligned to Common Core RST.9-10.2: find supporting details · reading level ~grade 9

Where you'd see this
  • A student reads a two-page article in the smart order and writes one sentence for the big picture, one for the main result, and one for the meaning.
  • A lab group reads only the figures of a paper and reports what each graph shows before reading any body text.
  • A student highlights the claim in a discussion paragraph and underlines the numbers that serve as evidence.
Video library
Watch: what the parts of a paper are
CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) in Biology
Amoeba Sisters · 7:39
Remediation: reading a graph inside a paper
Reading bar graph examples | Measurement and data | Early Math | Khan Academy
Khan Academy · 2:56
Extension: the three-pass reading order
Check Yourself with Lateral Reading: Crash Course Navigating Digital Information #3
CrashCourse · 13:52
Guided notes

Fill these in as you work through the lesson.

Big idea: Read a paper in a smart order (abstract, figures, conclusion, then methods if needed), in three passes, and pull out the claim, the evidence, and the reasoning.
Key terms: write the meaning
  • Abstract (one paragraph that gives the big picture):  
  • Figure (a graph or table that holds the results):  
  • Three-pass reading (read in three rounds, each one deeper):  
  • Methods (how the study was done; read to judge trust):  
The rule

Read the   first for the big picture, then the   for the results, then the conclusion for the meaning, and the   only if you need to judge the study.

Check yourself
  1. In your own words, what does the first pass of a three-pass read try to do? 
  2. Where in a paper do the actual results live, and why do you read that part before the methods? 
  3. Name one reason you would open the methods section. 
Work one example

A paper's discussion says the vaccine group had 3 infections versus 30 in the placebo group because the vaccine trained the immune system. Label the parts: Claim: ____. Evidence: ____. Reasoning: ____.

 
Illustrated glossary

The vocabulary of this topic, shown in the way you will meet it.

Abstract
A short paragraph at the very start of a paper that summarizes the whole study: the question, what was done, the main result, and what it means.
In context: Reading the abstract first told me the study tested a new asthma inhaler and found it cut attacks by half, so I knew the big picture before reading anything else.
Figure
A picture of the data, such as a graph, chart, or image, with a caption that tells you what it shows. Figures hold the paper's actual results.
A bar graph titled by its y-axis Survival percent, showing Drug A at 40 percent and Drug B at 75 percent
In context: The figure was a bar graph, and its caption said the taller bar meant higher survival, so I could read the result without reading the whole results section.
Discussion (Conclusion)
The section near the end where the authors explain what their results mean, why they matter, and what the limits are. It is where the main claim is stated in words.
In context: The discussion said the new inhaler worked but only on adults, which was the claim the whole paper was built to support.
Methods
The section that explains exactly how the study was done: who or what was tested, how many, and how the data was collected. You read it to judge whether the results can be trusted.
In context: I only opened the methods when I wanted to know how many patients were in the trial, because a result from ten people is weaker than one from a thousand.
Three-pass reading
A plan for reading a paper in three rounds, each one deeper: first a quick skim for the big idea, then a careful read of the figures and conclusion, then the details only if you still need them.
In context: Using three-pass reading, my first pass took five minutes and already told me whether the paper was worth a slower second pass.
Claim
The main point the authors are trying to prove: their one-sentence answer to the question the paper asks.
In context: The paper's claim was that the new inhaler reduced asthma attacks, and every figure was there to back that claim up.