ELA in Science
CoreScientific writing: proposal

Writing Research Proposals

Plan an investigation on paper first: state the question, give background, propose methods, and argue that the study is both feasible and worth doing.

Why this matters

Before anyone runs an experiment or spends a dollar, they usually have to write a proposal that convinces a reader the study is worth doing and can actually be done. A proposal is written in the future tense: it states the question or problem, gives background, offers a hypothesis, describes the methods you WILL use, predicts expected outcomes, and explains the significance (why it matters). Two tests decide its fate: is it feasible (can you really do it with your time, tools, and skills?) and is it significant (would the answer matter to anyone?). Scientists write grant proposals to fund their labs, engineers write design proposals to win a project, doctors write research protocols before a clinical trial can begin, and public health workers write proposals to launch a screening program. Learn to write one that is testable, feasible, and clearly significant, and you turn a vague idea into a plan people will approve.

Standards this builds
  • Common Core · WHST.9-10.2Write informative and explanatory texts that clearly convey a topic, using organized sections and precise scientific language.
  • Common Core · WHST.9-10.7Conduct short research projects to answer a question, narrowing or broadening the inquiry so it is focused and answerable.
  • NGSS · SEP-1Asking Questions and Defining Problems: ask a testable question and define an investigation that can realistically be carried out.
  • Ohio · Ohio ELA W.9-10.2Write clear explanatory texts that organize ideas and support a topic with relevant, well-chosen detail.
  • AP · AP Bio SP 3Design an experimental or investigative procedure to test a hypothesis, including a feasible plan for collecting data.
Builds on (2 levels back)inferred · high confidence
  • Tell a testable question from an opinion: A proposal is built on a question you can answer with measurable evidence, so students must first spot what is testable.
  • Name an independent and dependent variable: Proposed methods only make sense once students can say what they will change and what they will measure.
  • Write a plan in the future tense: A proposal describes what you WILL do; students need to write plans, not reports of finished work.

Prerequisites are inferred: pending teacher review.

Re-learn the skill with worked practice and clear examples.

Build the two parts that decide a proposal's fate. First, start from a testable question: variables you can measure and change, not an opinion. Then check the plan for the parts a reader needs, especially significance (why it matters) and feasibility (can it be done). Use the section table below and follow the worked model.

Step 1: Start from a testable question
A testable question compares things you can measure. 'Which soap is best?' is an opinion. 'Does soap A or soap B remove more bacteria from hands?' names a variable you change (soap) and one you measure (bacteria removed).
QuestionTestable?
Which soap is the best?No (opinion, nothing to measure)
Does soap A or B remove more bacteria?Yes (change soap, measure bacteria)
A table comparing a non-testable opinion question with a testable measurable question
Step 2: Check the proposal for all its parts
Read the draft against the section list: question, background, hypothesis, proposed methods, expected outcomes, and significance. If a section is absent, name it. The two most common gaps are significance ('so what?') and feasibility ('can this be done?').
SectionIts one job
Question/ProblemStates what you will study
BackgroundGives prior information
HypothesisPredicts the answer
Proposed methodsPlans the steps (future tense)
Expected outcomesPredicts what you will find
SignificanceSays why it matters and who benefits
A table listing each proposal section and the single job it does
Step 3: Judge feasibility against real limits
Feasibility asks if the plan fits your time, money, tools, and skills. 'We will scan 5,000 brains with an MRI this week' is not feasible for a student. 'We will survey 30 classmates over two weeks' is. A strong proposal narrows the plan until it fits.
Model check: Question 'Does soap A or B remove more bacteria from hands?' (testable). Methods: 20 volunteers, each washes with A on one hand and B on the other, then we swab and count colonies (feasible in a school lab). Significance: a cheaper effective soap could cut illness in schools (why it matters).
Practice

You are starting a proposal. Which is the best TESTABLE question to build it on?

Reviewed
  1. A.Is soap A better than soap B?
  2. B.Does washing with soap A or soap B remove more bacteria from hands?
  3. C.Why do people like soap A more than soap B?
  4. D.Should everyone use soap A?
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: B. Does washing with soap A or soap B remove more bacteria from hands?

  1. Step 1: Testable means measurable and comparable: Look for a variable you can change (which soap) and one you can measure (bacteria removed).
  2. Step 2: Compare options: Only 'Does washing with soap A or soap B remove more bacteria from hands?' can be answered by collecting data; the others rely on opinion or preference.

Why it's right: A testable question compares a variable you change (soap A vs B) with an outcome you can measure (bacteria removed), which this question does.

Why the others miss:
  • A: 'Better' is not defined or measured, so this is an opinion, not testable.
  • C: This asks about feelings (why people like it), which is a preference, not a measurable outcome.
  • D: 'Should everyone' asks for a recommendation, not a measurable comparison.

Aligned to NGSS SEP-1: ask a testable question · reading level ~grade 9

Using the section table, read this proposal draft: 'Question: Does disinfectant reduce desk bacteria? Background: desks carry germs. Hypothesis: disinfectant will lower bacteria. Methods: we will swab 20 desks, culture 48 hours, and count colonies. Expected outcomes: treated desks grow fewer colonies.' Which required section is MISSING?

Reviewed
SectionPresent in draft?
Question/ProblemYes
BackgroundYes
HypothesisYes
Proposed methodsYes
Expected outcomesYes
Significance?
A checklist table showing five proposal sections present and the significance row left as a question mark
  1. A.Proposed methods
  2. B.Hypothesis
  3. C.Significance (why it matters)
  4. D.Nothing; the proposal is complete
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: C. Significance (why it matters)

  1. Step 1: Match each sentence to a section: The draft has a question, background, hypothesis, methods, and expected outcomes.
  2. Step 2: Find the empty row: No sentence says why the answer matters or who benefits, so the significance section is missing.

Why it's right: Every section is present except significance; no sentence explains why the answer matters or who would use it, so significance is missing.

Why the others miss:
  • A: The methods are present ('swab 20 desks, culture 48 hours, count colonies').
  • B: The hypothesis is present ('disinfectant will lower bacteria').
  • D: It is not complete; the significance section is absent.

Aligned to Common Core WHST.9-10.2: include all required sections · reading level ~grade 9

A student's proposal question is testable, but the plan says: 'We will test the drinking water in every home in Cleveland this weekend and run DNA tests on each sample.' What is the main problem with this proposal?

Reviewed
  1. A.The question is not testable.
  2. B.It is not feasible: a student cannot test every home in a city in one weekend with DNA tests.
  3. C.It is missing a hypothesis.
  4. D.It uses the future tense.
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: B. It is not feasible: a student cannot test every home in a city in one weekend with DNA tests.

  1. Step 1: Ask if the plan fits real limits: Feasibility means the plan fits the time, money, tools, and skills you actually have.
  2. Step 2: Name the mismatch: Every home in a city, in one weekend, with DNA tests, is far beyond a student's time and resources, so the plan is not feasible.

Why it's right: The plan far exceeds a student's time, tools, and budget, so its main weakness is that it is not feasible.

Why the others miss:
  • A: The stem says the question is already testable, so that is not the problem.
  • C: The problem is the scale of the plan, not a missing hypothesis; feasibility is what fails here.
  • D: Future tense is correct for a proposal, so it is not the problem.

Aligned to AP Bio SP 3: design a feasible procedure · reading level ~grade 9

Where you'd see this
  • A student rewrites 'Which vitamin is best?' into a testable comparison before starting a proposal.
  • A lab group checks a draft against the six-section table and adds the significance sentence it was missing.
  • A team shrinks 'test every home in the city' down to '30 homes in our neighborhood' so the plan becomes feasible.
Video library
Prerequisite: what makes a question testable
Introduction to experimental design | High school biology | Khan Academy
Khan Academy · 9:00
Remediation: planning methods and outcomes
The scientific method
Khan Academy · 11:48
Extension: feasibility and significance
Experimental Design
Bozeman Science · 17:53
Guided notes

Fill these in as you work through the lesson.

Big idea: A research proposal is a future-tense plan that states a testable question, gives background, offers a hypothesis, describes proposed methods and expected outcomes, and argues the study is both feasible and significant.
Key terms: write the meaning
  • Testable question (measurable, comparable, not an opinion):  
  • Proposed methods (the steps you WILL do, in future tense):  
  • Feasibility (can it be done with your time, tools, and budget):  
  • Significance (why it matters and who benefits):  
The rule

A proposal is written in the   tense; it must be   (a plan that can be done) and   (worth doing because the answer matters).

Check yourself
  1. Rewrite the opinion question 'Which soap is best?' as a testable question. 
  2. Read a draft against the six sections and name any that are missing. 
  3. Write one significance sentence that says who would benefit from your study's answer. 
Work one example

Fix this proposal: Question 'Which cleaner is best?' Plan: 'test every hospital in the state this weekend.' Testable question: ____. Feasible plan: ____. Significance: ____.

 
Illustrated glossary

The vocabulary of this topic, shown in the way you will meet it.

Research proposal
A written plan, in the future tense, for an investigation you have not done yet. It says what you will study, how, and why it matters.
In context: In her proposal, Maria wrote, 'This study will test whether hand-sanitizer type affects bacterial growth on classroom desks.'
Testable question
A question you can answer by collecting evidence, with variables you can measure and change. It is not a matter of opinion.
QuestionTestable?
Which soap is the best?No (opinion, no measure)
Does soap A or soap B remove more bacteria?Yes (measurable, comparable)
A two-row table comparing an opinion question that is not testable with a measurable question that is testable
In context: 'Does soap A or soap B remove more bacteria from hands?' is testable; 'Which soap is best?' is not, because 'best' is an opinion.
Feasibility
Whether the study can actually be done with the time, money, equipment, and skills you have. A feasible plan fits real limits.
In context: Testing 10,000 patients in one week is not feasible for a student, so the proposal narrows it to 30 volunteers over two weeks.
Significance
Why the study matters: who would care about the answer and how it could be used. It is the 'so what?' of the proposal.
In context: The significance section explained that a cheaper test for lead in water could protect families who cannot afford lab testing.
Proposed methods
The step-by-step plan of what you WILL do to collect data, written before the study starts (future tense).
Three boxes in order, swab desks then culture 48 hours then count colonies, showing a proposed method plan
In context: The proposed methods stated, 'We will swab 20 desks, culture each sample for 48 hours, and count colonies.'
Expected outcomes
What you predict you will find if your hypothesis is correct, stated before you have the data.
In context: Expected outcomes: 'We expect desks cleaned with disinfectant to grow fewer colonies than untreated desks.'