ELA in Science
CoreScientific writing: methods

Materials & Methods

Write a precise, past-tense record of exactly what you used and did, detailed enough that another person could repeat your investigation and get the same result.

Why this matters

Science only counts as evidence if someone else can repeat it. The Materials and Methods section is your promise that they can: it is a precise, past-tense record of what you used and what you did, with the amounts, times, and conditions that make the result possible to reproduce. It is a record of what happened, not a set of instructions telling the reader what to do. Notice the difference between a method and a procedure: a procedure is the how-to list you follow while working ('Add 5 mL of buffer'), while a method is the finished report of what was actually done ('5 mL of buffer was added'). Lab technicians read a methods section to run the same test again, peer reviewers read it to judge whether the work was done well, and forensic analysts write it so a court can trust that the evidence was handled correctly. When another team cannot reproduce a published result, the methods section is the first place everyone looks. Learn to write it well and your work stops being a story and starts being something others can check, trust, and build on.

Standards this builds
  • Common Core · WHST.9-10.2Write informative/explanatory texts, including scientific procedures and experiments, with precise, well-chosen detail.
  • Common Core · RST.9-10.3Follow precisely a complex multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks.
  • NGSS · SEP-8Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information: communicate scientific procedures and findings clearly enough that others can reproduce them.
  • Ohio · Ohio ELA W.9-10.2Write to convey complex processes clearly and accurately using precise language and relevant, sufficient detail.
  • AP · AP Bio SP 3Design and describe an experimental procedure, including the controls and measurements needed to test a hypothesis.
Builds on (2 levels back)inferred · high confidence
  • Tell past-tense from command (imperative) writing: A method is written in the past tense as a record, so students first need to hear the difference between 'was added' and 'add'.
  • Write an amount with its unit: Methods report exact quantities, so students must pair a number with a unit (5 mL, 2.0 g) instead of saying 'some'.
  • Name the sections of a lab report: Students need to know Materials and Methods is one section, separate from Results and Conclusion, before deciding what belongs in it.

Prerequisites are inferred: pending teacher review.

Re-learn the skill with worked practice and clear examples.

Now write a methods section that another person could actually repeat. A reproducible method names the amounts, times, and conditions for every step. Use the checklist and the example below to find what a weak sentence is missing, then add it.

Step 1: Check for amount, time, and condition
For each action, a strong method answers three questions: how much (amount with a unit), for how long (time), and under what conditions (temperature, light, and so on). If any answer is missing, the reader cannot repeat that step.
A three-row checklist labeled Amount (how much), Time (for how long), and Condition (at what temperature or light)
Step 2: Find the gap in a weak sentence
Weak: 'We put some salt in water and waited.' It is missing the amount of salt, the amount of water, and the time. Strong: '2.0 g of salt was dissolved in 50 mL of water and left for 30 minutes.'
Step 3: Write it as a repeatable record
Put the details into a past-tense record. Now another group has the amount, the volume, and the time, so they can copy the setup exactly.
Model method sentence: '2.0 g of table salt was dissolved in 50 mL of room-temperature (about 22 C) water and the solution was left undisturbed for 30 minutes.' It names the amount (2.0 g), the volume (50 mL), the condition (about 22 C), and the time (30 minutes).
Practice

A student wrote this method sentence: 'We added salt to the water and stirred it.' Using the checklist, which detail is MOST needed to make it reproducible?

Reviewed
Checklist itemIn the sentence?
Amount of saltNo
Amount of waterNo
Stir timeNo
Action (added, stirred)Yes
A checklist table showing the amount of salt, amount of water, and stir time are missing, while the action is present
  1. A.Change 'added' to the past tense.
  2. B.The exact amounts (how much salt and how much water) and the stir time.
  3. C.The name of the student who did it.
  4. D.A sentence saying the salt dissolved quickly.
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: B. The exact amounts (how much salt and how much water) and the stir time.

  1. Step 1: Read the checklist: The table shows the action is present, but the amount of salt, amount of water, and stir time are all missing.
  2. Step 2: Pick the reproducibility gap: To repeat this step, another person needs the exact amounts and the time; those are what the sentence lacks.

Why it's right: The checklist shows the amounts and the time are missing, and those are exactly the details another person needs to repeat the step, so adding them makes it reproducible.

Why the others miss:
  • A: The sentence is already past tense ('added,' 'stirred'), so tense is not the gap.
  • C: The person's name does not help anyone repeat the step.
  • D: How fast the salt dissolved is a result, not a setup detail needed to repeat it.

Aligned to Common Core WHST.9-10.2: precise quantitative detail · reading level ~grade 9

Which rewrite of 'We heated the liquid for a while' is the BEST method sentence?

Reviewed
  1. A.We heated the liquid until it looked ready.
  2. B.The liquid was heated to 60 C for 10 minutes.
  3. C.Heat the liquid for a while, then stop.
  4. D.The liquid got pretty hot after some time.
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: B. The liquid was heated to 60 C for 10 minutes.

  1. Step 1: Name amount, time, and condition: A strong method gives numbers: what temperature and for how long, written as a record.
  2. Step 2: Compare options: Only 'heated to 60 C for 10 minutes' gives a specific condition and time in past tense; the others are vague or are commands.

Why it's right: A reproducible method states the condition and time as a past-tense record; '60 C for 10 minutes' gives both exactly so the step can be repeated.

Why the others miss:
  • A: 'Until it looked ready' is a judgment, not a measurable condition, so it cannot be repeated.
  • C: 'Heat the liquid' is a command (procedure), and 'for a while' has no number.
  • D: 'Pretty hot' and 'some time' give no measurable amount or time.

Aligned to Common Core RST.9-10.3: precise multistep detail · reading level ~grade 9

A methods section reads: 'The samples were kept in the dark for 24 hours, then their mass increased by 3 g.' Which part does NOT belong in Materials and Methods?

Reviewed
  1. A.'The samples were kept in the dark' (a condition).
  2. B.'for 24 hours' (a time).
  3. C.'their mass increased by 3 g' (a measured outcome).
  4. D.Nothing; every part belongs here.
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: C. 'their mass increased by 3 g' (a measured outcome).

  1. Step 1: Methods hold setup, not outcomes: The condition (dark) and the time (24 hours) describe the setup. A measured change in mass is a result.
  2. Step 2: Find the misplaced part: 'Their mass increased by 3 g' is data that was measured, so it belongs in Results, not Methods.

Why it's right: Materials and Methods records the setup (a dark condition kept for 24 hours), but a measured mass increase of 3 g is an outcome that belongs in Results.

Why the others miss:
  • A: Keeping samples in the dark is a condition, which belongs in Methods.
  • B: The 24-hour time is a setup detail that belongs in Methods.
  • D: It is not all correct; the measured mass increase is a result placed in the wrong section.

Aligned to NGSS SEP-8: keep methods separate from results · reading level ~grade 9

Where you'd see this
  • A student revises a PLTW lab procedure into a past-tense methods section with every amount and time filled in.
  • A lab group runs a weak methods paragraph through the amount/time/condition checklist and adds the missing numbers.
  • A test-taker rewrites a vague sentence ('we waited a while') into a measurable record ('the tubes were left for 15 minutes at room temperature').
Video library
Watch: where Materials and Methods fit in a report
CER (Claim, Evidence, Reasoning) in Biology
Amoeba Sisters · 7:39
Remediation: past-tense record with amounts and conditions
SCI207 Lab Report 4: Materials and Methods Section
Clifford Blizard · 1:21
Extension: what makes a procedure reproducible
The scientific method
Khan Academy · 11:48
Guided notes

Fill these in as you work through the lesson.

Big idea: Materials and Methods is a precise, past-tense record of what was used and done, with the amounts, times, and conditions that let another person reproduce the work; it is a record, not a how-to for the reader.
Key terms: write the meaning
  • Method (past-tense record of what was done):  
  • Procedure (step-by-step how-to you follow):  
  • Reproducible (another person can repeat it and get the same kind of result):  
  • Condition (a controlled part of the setup (temp, light, time)):  
The rule

A method is written in the   tense as a record, not as an   to the reader; it must name the amounts, times, and   so the work is reproducible.

Check yourself
  1. Rewrite this command as a method: 'Add 5 mL of buffer to the tube.' 
  2. List the three checklist questions a strong method answers for each step. 
  3. Given 'we heated the liquid for a while,' name what is missing and rewrite it as a reproducible record. 
Work one example

Turn this weak sentence into a reproducible method: 'We put some salt in water and waited.' Amount of salt: ____. Amount of water: ____. Time: ____. Rewrite (past tense): ____.

 
Illustrated glossary

The vocabulary of this topic, shown in the way you will meet it.

Materials and Methods
The section of a lab report or paper that records, in past tense, exactly what was used and what was done, in enough detail to repeat the work.
In context: In the Materials and Methods, the student wrote: 'Three 250 mL flasks were each filled with 100 mL of pond water and left under a grow light for 7 days.'
Reproducible
Able to be repeated by someone else who follows the same steps and gets the same kind of result.
Two boxes, Lab A and Lab B, both showing 100 mL, 25 C, 7 days, with an arrow showing the same details are copied so the work can be repeated
In context: The method was reproducible because it listed the exact volume, temperature, and time, so another class could run it and compare results.
Procedure
The step-by-step how-to list you follow while working, usually written in command form (numbered instructions).
In context: The procedure on the handout read: 'Step 1. Add 5 mL of buffer. Step 2. Shake for 30 seconds.'
Method
The past-tense record of what was actually done, written for a reader who is not following along but wants to know what happened.
In context: The method in the report read: '5 mL of buffer was added and the tube was shaken for 30 seconds,' a record rather than an instruction.
Condition
A controlled part of the setup that could change the result, such as temperature, light, or time.
In context: The report named every condition: the samples were kept at 37 C in the dark for 24 hours.
Quantity (amount)
A number with a unit that tells exactly how much was used or measured, such as 5 mL or 2.0 g.
In context: Instead of 'some salt,' the method gave the quantity: '2.0 g of table salt was dissolved in 50 mL of water.'