Maintain chain of custody
Keep an unbroken, signed handoff trail for every piece of evidence so it can be trusted later.
- Labeling a sample with unique ID, date, and collector: A custody trail only works if each item already has a unique label; without it you cannot tell which row of the log is about which item.
- Recording events in time order: Chain of custody is a time-ordered list of handoffs, so you first need the habit of logging who did what, when, in sequence.
Prerequisites are inferred: pending teacher review.
Re-learn the skill with worked practice and clear examples.
Chain of custody is an unbroken, signed log of every person who handled a specimen, when, and why: from collection to analysis.
In the custody log shown, which row shows a break in the chain of custody?
Reviewed| Row | Released by | Received by | Date/Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J. Ruiz (collector) | M. Chen (transport) | 06/22 09:10 |
| 2 | M. Chen (transport) | A. Patel (intake) | 06/22 10:30 |
| 3 | A. Patel (intake) | (no signature) | 06/22 11:00 |
| 4 | A. Patel (intake) | L. Gomez (analyst) | 06/22 13:15 |
- A.Row 1
- B.Row 2
- C.Row 3
- D.Row 4
Show the worked solution ▾
Answer: C. Row 3
- Step 1: Check each handoff: Every row should name both who released the specimen and who received it.
- Step 2: Find the gap: Row 3 lists a releaser but the 'Received by' is blank, so no one signed for taking the specimen: the trail is broken there.
Why it's right: Row 3 has no receiving signature, so there is no record of who held the specimen at that handoff: an unbroken chain requires both signatures.
- A: Row 1 names both the collector and the transporter with a time.
- B: Row 2 connects cleanly to Row 1 and names both people.
- D: Row 4 names both A. Patel and the analyst with a time.
Aligned to BI forensics: chain of custody · reading level ~grade 9
- A lab rejects a sample whose custody log skips from the collector straight to the analyst with no intake handoff in between.
Fill these in as you work through the lesson.
- Chain of custody (the documented handoff trail):
- Specimen (the sample being tracked):
- Handoff (one person passing the item to the next):
- Unique ID (what keeps two specimens from being confused):
A custody log is trustworthy only when every is recorded with the date, the person, and a reason, with no in the timeline.
- Why does each handoff need both a release and a receive signature?
- What does a missing row in the middle of a custody log tell a reviewer?
- How does a unique specimen ID keep one sample from being mixed up with another?
You collect a tissue specimen at 9:10, hand it to a lab tech at 10:30, and the tech logs it into storage at 11:00. Write the three custody-log rows you would record so the trail is unbroken.
