Biotechnology for Health (Biomedical Innovations)
Unit 4: Problem 4: Environmental HealthBI 4.1Biomedical Innovation: data, error & causation

Separate correlation from causation

Tell 'two things move together' from 'one thing causes the other,' and spot a hidden third factor (confounder).

Builds on (2 levels back)inferred · high confidence
  • Reading a trend between two variables: Correlation is a trend between two variables, so you first need to read whether they rise or fall together.
  • Controlled comparison: Causation is shown by holding other factors constant, so you need the idea of comparing groups that differ in only one way.

Prerequisites are inferred: pending teacher review.

Re-learn the skill with worked practice and clear examples.

A correlation means two things move together; causation means one makes the other happen. A confounder is a hidden third factor that can create a correlation without any direct cause.

Step 1: Separate the two ideas
Correlation = the two move together. Causation = changing one actually changes the other. Correlation can exist with no causation between them.
Step 2: Look for a confounder
A confounder is a hidden third factor tied to both variables. If a confounder drives both, the two will move together even though neither causes the other.
Step 3: Use a fresh test case
Sunscreen use and skin-cancer cases both rise in sunny regions. Sunscreen does not cause cancer: sun exposure (the confounder) drives both more sunscreen use and more cancer.
Practice

Across towns, more streetlights are linked with more nighttime crime. A reporter writes 'streetlights cause crime.' What is the most likely flaw?

Reviewed
  1. A.Streetlights truly cause crime
  2. B.Town size is a confounder: bigger towns have both more streetlights and more crime
  3. C.The two variables are not correlated
  4. D.Crime is an outlier
Show the worked solution ▾

Answer: B. Town size is a confounder: bigger towns have both more streetlights and more crime

  1. Step 1: Check the claim type: The reporter jumped from 'linked' (correlation) to 'cause' (causation) with no test.
  2. Step 2: Find a hidden third factor: Bigger towns have more of almost everything: more streetlights and more crime: so town size can drive both.

Why it's right: Town size is a confounder tied to both variables, so the correlation does not show that streetlights cause crime.

Why the others miss:
  • A: A correlation alone cannot prove this cause.
  • C: They are correlated; that is given.
  • D: This is about a confounded correlation, not a single stray point.

Aligned to Biomedical Innovation: correlation vs. causation · reading level ~grade 9

Where you'd see this
  • A news graph showing two rising lines is often a confounded correlation, not proof of cause.
Video library
Watch: Separate correlation from causation
Correlation Doesn't Equal Causation: Crash Course Statistics #8
CrashCourse · ~11 min
Guided notes

Fill these in as you work through the lesson.

Big idea: Two things moving together (correlation) does not prove one causes the other; a hidden third factor (a confounder) can drive both.
Key terms: write the meaning
  • Correlation (two things tend to move together):  
  • Causation (one thing actually makes the other happen):  
  • Confounder (a hidden third factor linked to both):  
  • Controlled comparison (groups that differ in only the one thing you test):  
The rule

When two things rise together you have a  , but that is not proof of  ; before claiming cause, rule out a hidden third factor called a  .

Check yourself
  1. Ice-cream sales and pool drownings both rise in summer. Name a hidden factor that could drive both. 
  2. Why does 'two things move together' not prove one causes the other? 
  3. What kind of study would let you actually test whether a factor causes an effect? 
Work one example

Over one summer, neighborhoods with more parks also have lower asthma rates. Explain why this correlation does not prove parks cause less asthma, and name a possible confounder.